Should evolution be taught in high school?

Feb 24, 2008 Full story: www.scientificblogging.com 175,466

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand." Full Story
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115798 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Transmutation from a worm to a man is not simple "changing allele frequencies", so why do you persist in irrelevant extrapolations?
Why do you insist on irrelevant caricatures?
HTS wrote:
As far as scientific evidence for God... Perhaps you could enlighten me on the significance of the Wheeler delayed choice experiment. How does your paradigm of atheism explain the existence of intelligence in photons of light?
Yet more bastardization of quantum physics by wishful thinking fundies.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115799 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
How does your paradigm of atheism
By the way, I have no idea what you're talking about here. When have I ever argued a positive case for atheism? How are atheism and theism relevant to science?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115800 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>. I don't simply swallow whatever BS is out there on atheist websites. If you have some scientific evidence that HiV is "evolving", let's see it... I would be very interested.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/01/...

But why lie and claim you're interested when you're not? After all, all you'll do is say it's only "micro" and complain that AIDS hasn't evolved into an aardvark.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115801 Feb 1, 2013
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TCT...

Don't forget this now HTS, will you?
Mugwump

Manchester, UK

#115802 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>. I don't simply swallow whatever BS is out there on atheist websites. If you have some scientific evidence that HiV is "evolving", let's see it... I would be very interested.
Sorry - do you have learning difficulties ?

I am specifically asking you to back up the following claim you made.
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Most physicians who actually practice science consider Darwinian evolution to be largely BS.
Why not just say you made it up then we can move on, currently you are just looking dishonest AND deluded.

Seriously you fundies would make an AWESOME dodgeball team

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115803 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
We admit a duality of religion and science. You misrepresent ideology and history as "science", i.e., you guys are the ones at fault - not us.

Sorry, but this is not correct. Evolution and all related sciences (basically ALL the sciences) have a method by which observation (data) lead to hypothesis, then testing, refinement, theory, predictions, verification, replication, peer review,....

Creationism just says "goddoneit" and trys to rationalize/distort the evidence to fit the a priori conclusion. That is not science. Never was and never can be.
Alien Outlaw

Kansas City, MO

#115804 Feb 1, 2013
appleby wrote:
<quoted text>
Something to ponder. If, say aliens are responsible for life on earth, what would be their point in hiding and leaving no trace of their existence? Life has been on the planet (still no evidence of how it came to be) for 3.5 billion years. It wouldn't make any difference to fish, frogs, deer or dogs whether or not aliens were on the planet, so why would they hide?
As we explore we leave our artifacts everywhere we go, the moon, mars, even on asteroids. We don't try to cover our tracks on mars, hoping to fool some future life form into believing that god did it.
They don't hide. Thousands of sightings, close encounters, abductions and MIB encounters happen all the time. Humans that have not had an encounter do not believe the ones that have had encounters. The reason no evidence is found is because they control and munipulate the human animal.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115805 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, on the subject. And not a one proves macroevolution true. Isn't it about time to consider an alternative?

If there was an alternative it would be considered. But no one has come up with a scientifically viable alternative even after 150 years of trying

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115806 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Transmutation from a worm to a man is not simple "changing allele frequencies", so why do you persist in irrelevant extrapolations?
As far as scientific evidence for God... Perhaps you could enlighten me on the significance of the Wheeler delayed choice experiment. How does your paradigm of atheism explain the existence of intelligence in photons of light?

"Intelligence" of photons?

You have access to good drugs.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115807 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>. I don't simply swallow whatever BS is out there on atheist websites. If you have some scientific evidence that HiV is "evolving", let's see it... I would be very interested.

https://www.google.com/search...

About 15,900,000 results (0.22 seconds)

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115808 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I can't imagine why you'd want to bring up ERV's... The failed junk DNA debacle only further debunks evolution. I didn't reference it only to spare you further embarrassment.

ERVs are one of the proofs of evolution. There is no other way to explain them that actually fits the facts.

By "junk DNA" I assume you mean non protein coding DNA. That does nothing to support creotardism. In fact the non-protein coding portions of DNA contain further proofs of evolution. not exactly something an antiscience buff such as yourself would want to draw attention to.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115809 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Your philosophical opinion that atheism is irrelevant to evolution is likewise irrelevant.

Fact: the first mechanism of evolution was discovered by a Christian.
Fact: the nested hierarchy of evolution was discovered by a Christian.
Fact: some of the greatest evolutionary biologists were/are Christians.
Fact: The secrets of the ultimate proof of evolution (DNA) was proposed and discovered by a Christian.

Therefore: atheism is irrelevant to evolution.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115810 Feb 1, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not an opinion. The scientific theory of evolution makes no theological opinions. If you wanna complain that it's "atheistic" then you could make the same complaint about EVERY single currently accepted field of science. As none of those make any theological claims either.
That's why your local weather reporter doesn't mention the wrath of the Gods when it rains, and why gravity doesn't mention anything about intelligent falling.

Actually this atheist driven conspiracy goes even further than you might imagine.

Bowling makes no theological claims.
Kite flying makes no theological claims.
table fan design makes no theological claims.
Silver mining makes no theological claims.
Thumb twiddling! Thumb twiddling makes NO theological claims!

And,... here is the kicker

DIPPER CHANGING! Dipper changing makes NOT ONE SINGLE theological claim.

G.D. atheists are running EVERYTHING!

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115811 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>ERV's have long been labeled as junk DNA.

Um... better look that up again. ERVs can occur in either coding or non protein coding portions of DNA. The ERVs themselves can be functional or non-functional in terms of protein coding.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#115812 Feb 1, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Fact: the first mechanism of evolution was discovered by a Christian.
Fact: the nested hierarchy of evolution was discovered by a Christian.
Fact: some of the greatest evolutionary biologists were/are Christians.
Fact: The secrets of the ultimate proof of evolution (DNA) was proposed and discovered by a Christian.
Therefore: atheism is irrelevant to evolution.
Atheism and evolution are unrelated concepts. That is true.
But Christianity and evolution are also unrelated concepts. That is also true.

So fecking what??

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115813 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd. Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support...

And older poll
http://phys.org/news6847.html

Further explication
http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2007/01/why-d...
One way or another

United States

#115814 Feb 1, 2013
The childish clique pretends to have many names, but in reality, they have one face and that is the face of deceit.

They hate hard, provable science, because that field must be proven. With evolution, they don't have to prove anything.

They care nothing for science and not one of them in all the years they have been here, have ever offered even one new thought to science.

Level 6

Since: Aug 07

North Miami Beach, FL

#115815 Feb 1, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Why of course not. Ignoring of course the shedloads of inconvenient facts you've avoided for three years or something.
<quoted text>
Well I dunno. How about invisible magical Jewish wizards? That's scientific, right?
Dodge.

YOU said there was literally hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed articles on the subject of evolution. I asked for ONE that proves macroevolution true.

Right.

Let me make this so simple even an evotard can understand:

Cowboy's Rule of non-macroevolution:

"All biological living organisms have (for all practical purposes) unlimited genetic variation permanently locked within its own species (and only rarely as much as within genus or even family - but no further, collectively referred to as within "created kind"), and with no known significant exceptions."

Prove me wrong.

Level 6

Since: Aug 07

North Miami Beach, FL

#115816 Feb 1, 2013
Furthermore,

Cowboy's Rule of Non-Macroevolution:

"All biological living organisms have (for all practical purposes) unlimited genetic variation, such that, the organism remains forever permanently locked within its own defined species (and only rarely as much as within genus or even family - but no further, regardless the number of generations or passage of time, and with no known historic or existing significant exceptions."

Level 6

Since: Aug 07

North Miami Beach, FL

#115817 Feb 1, 2013
One way or another wrote:
The childish clique...With evolution, they don't have to prove anything.
And in their minds they get to continue behaving just like animals because after all, that's what they are...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 5 min Kong_ 127,906
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 18 min Chimney1 139,549
An atheistic view on evolution vs. a godly view... 1 hr Charles Idemi 93
god is not real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jun '06) 3 hr Ooogah Boogah 13,578
Ten Reason Why Evolution Is a Lie (Jul '09) Wed MikeF 1,902
More Theories to Disprove Creation Wed The Dude 64
Atheism - A Non Prophet Organisation (Mar '11) Tue The Dude 996

Evolution Debate People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE