Should evolution be taught in high sc...

Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 178700 comments on the www.scientificblogging.com story from Feb 24, 2008, titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

HTS

South Lake Tahoe, CA

#115779 Feb 1, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Your claim was that most physicians reject evolution. So leave the goalposts where they are and back up your claim.
I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd. Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#115780 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd. Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".
Then you don't know many competent physicians.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115781 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>ERV's have long been labeled as junk DNA.
So snap to it.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115782 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd.
Yeah, Markie says the same thing too. He's also a great big giant fat liar for Jesus. But since he lives in the Bible belt it could be one of those rare times he's telling the truth.

On the other hand, we can provide you with literally hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed papers on the subject of evolution. Very few of which question the validity of evolution as a whole.
HTS wrote:
Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".
Change in allele frequencies over time. The fact is that life changes over time. We call this evolution. And we couldn't give two figs about your invisible magic Jew-wizard.

Unless of course you've finally managed to come up with a "scientific theory" of IDC for us?

.

?

.

Didn't think so.

Level 6

Since: Aug 07

Arlington, VA

#115783 Feb 1, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Markie says the same thing too. He's also a great big giant fat liar for Jesus. But since he lives in the Bible belt it could be one of those rare times he's telling the truth.
On the other hand, we can provide you with literally hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed papers on the subject of evolution. Very few of which question the validity of evolution as a whole.
<quoted text>
Change in allele frequencies over time. The fact is that life changes over time. We call this evolution. And we couldn't give two figs about your invisible magic Jew-wizard.
Unless of course you've f
inally managed to come up with a "scientific theory" of IDC for us?
.
?
.
Didn't think so.
Dude, you certainly have turned into a sour puss. Losing all the time must be much fun.

Level 6

Since: Aug 07

Arlington, VA

#115784 Feb 1, 2013
The Dude wrote:
On the other hand, we can provide you with literally hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed papers on the subject of evolution.
Yes, on the subject. And not a one proves macroevolution true. Isn't it about time to consider an alternative?
Mugwump

Manchester, UK

#115785 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>If you want to get into the HIV/AIDS debate then be my guest... HIV has not "evolved"... Where are you getting your information?
Sorry you seem to have a problem with comprehension of the written word.- let me help you out ...

You said
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>Most physicians who actually practice science consider Darwinian evolution to be largely BS.
I and others asked you to back this up

You constantly ignore the point

Conclusion : you make shit up.

Sorry I REALLY don't see how I can dumb it down to your level anymore - maybe wax crayons?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115786 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude, you certainly have turned into a sour puss. Losing all the time must be much fun.
Same old Dude as I've always been. Ain't lost to you yet.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115787 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, on the subject. And not a one proves macroevolution true.
Why of course not. Ignoring of course the shedloads of inconvenient facts you've avoided for three years or something.
Urban Cowboy wrote:
Isn't it about time to consider an alternative?
Well I dunno. How about invisible magical Jewish wizards? That's scientific, right?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115788 Feb 1, 2013
Mugwump wrote:
Sorry I REALLY don't see how I can dumb it down to your level anymore
Cowboy could probably help.

(evil grin)
right

Kent, WA

#115789 Feb 1, 2013
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>Something to ponder. If, say aliens are responsible for life on earth, what would be their point in hiding and leaving no trace of their existence? Life has been on the planet (still no evidence of how it came to be) for 3.5 billion years. It wouldn't make any difference to fish, frogs, deer or dogs whether or not aliens were on the planet, so why would they hide?

As we explore we leave our artifacts everywhere we go, the moon, mars, even on astroids. We don't try to cover our tracks on mars, hoping to fool some future life form into believing that goddidit.
Maybe they were dying out because their planet wasnt habitable anymore due to global warming so they found this place, tried to survive but couldnt so their leftover DNA mutated and then evolved and turned into earth life.
right

Kent, WA

#115790 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd. Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".
Alien sperm goo could produce goo to you..i dont see why not...i live about an hour and a half from the south shore. Since the temps have been warmer during the day has the snow become slushy or is it still good for snowboarding?

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115791 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't read it. I work 60-70 hours a week and spend nights and weekends on my hobbies playing guitar and science. Occasionally I get to go flying or scuba diving or boating. That's about all I have time for.

You mean anti-science

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115793 Feb 1, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
Using the tools of operational science is a good thing and has nothing to do with evolution's attempt to interpret history.

"operational science" sounds great but in actually just creationist pseudoscience.
HTS

South Lake Tahoe, CA

#115794 Feb 1, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, Markie says the same thing too. He's also a great big giant fat liar for Jesus. But since he lives in the Bible belt it could be one of those rare times he's telling the truth.
On the other hand, we can provide you with literally hundreds of thousands of peer-reviewed papers on the subject of evolution. Very few of which question the validity of evolution as a whole.
<quoted text>
Change in allele frequencies over time. The fact is that life changes over time. We call this evolution. And we couldn't give two figs about your invisible magic Jew-wizard.
Unless of course you've finally managed to come up with a "scientific theory" of IDC for us?
.
?
.
Didn't think so.
Transmutation from a worm to a man is not simple "changing allele frequencies", so why do you persist in irrelevant extrapolations?
As far as scientific evidence for God... Perhaps you could enlighten me on the significance of the Wheeler delayed choice experiment. How does your paradigm of atheism explain the existence of intelligence in photons of light?
HTS

South Lake Tahoe, CA

#115795 Feb 1, 2013
Mugwump wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry you seem to have a problem with comprehension of the written word.- let me help you out ...
?
. I don't simply swallow whatever BS is out there on atheist websites. If you have some scientific evidence that HiV is "evolving", let's see it... I would be very interested.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#115796 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>. I don't simply swallow whatever BS is out there on atheist websites. If you have some scientific evidence that HiV is "evolving", let's see it... I would be very interested.
EVERY living thing is evolving, all the time, it never stops.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#115797 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>I don't have a scientific survey. I know that the majority of physicians I know think goo-to-you evolution is absurd. Any survey that you can site will invariably fail to define "evolution".
Could you provide a list of these physicians so that I can avoid them?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115798 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Transmutation from a worm to a man is not simple "changing allele frequencies", so why do you persist in irrelevant extrapolations?
Why do you insist on irrelevant caricatures?
HTS wrote:
As far as scientific evidence for God... Perhaps you could enlighten me on the significance of the Wheeler delayed choice experiment. How does your paradigm of atheism explain the existence of intelligence in photons of light?
Yet more bastardization of quantum physics by wishful thinking fundies.(shrug)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115799 Feb 1, 2013
HTS wrote:
How does your paradigm of atheism
By the way, I have no idea what you're talking about here. When have I ever argued a positive case for atheism? How are atheism and theism relevant to science?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 4 hr Hit and Run 173,880
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 hr said 20,899
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 8 hr ChromiuMan 143,939
News Pastafarians rejoice! Deep sea creature floatin... 11 hr karl44 1
Satan's Lies and Scientist Guys (Sep '14) 13 hr dollarsbill 14
News Intelligent design Tue FREE SERVANT 23
How would creationists explain... (Nov '14) Aug 30 Chimney1 583
More from around the web