Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 20 comments on the Feb 24, 2008, www.scientificblogging.com story titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115439 Jan 29, 2013
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>
I suppose we might be splitting hairs on the concept of what constitutes a delusion. But either way, intensive institutional treatment is Jim's best hope for recovery.

He has no hope of recovery.
One way or another

United States

#115440 Jan 29, 2013
Well children, you constantly play your same games, because you have nothing of your own. Tsk tsk children. You play your stupid childish games and I'll play mine. Oops, mine includes new and real science. Let us know when you evo children get a brain.
One way or another

United States

#115441 Jan 29, 2013
Coming depression aftershock

Ya know how I've always been projecting doom and gloom for our economy, well children, its gonna get much worse. The housing market will keep falling, the stock market will crash again and we will suffer another depression, much much deeper than the last Great Depression.

It will happen within 1 to 5 years.

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/aftershockb/video47a....
LowellGuy

United States

#115442 Jan 29, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
The record indicates that any particular species has always been the same species. From whatever layer you find a fossil of it to the time it went extinct or until present day. This simple fact negates all your dream-weaving stories. And then you have actual observable science. Still there is no clear-cut example of any organism changing into something different than what it is. Only variations on a common theme. Common design by a common designer is what is obviously the case. There are several generic design concepts that have been slightly modified for variety. There is no evidence at all that any particular specific design changed its basic form just due to the passage of time. Plus you have all the genetic controls for error correction and maintenance to prevent this from happening. Plus you have genetic entropy and accumulating deleteriuos mutations working against change.
Finches are not a species.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#115443 Jan 29, 2013
One way or another wrote:
Coming depression aftershock

Ya know how I've always been projecting doom and gloom for our economy, well children, its gonna get much worse. The housing market will keep falling, the stock market will crash again and we will suffer another depression, much much deeper than the last Great Depression.

It will happen within 1 to 5 years.

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/aftershockb/video47a....
Is it time again for you to take your meds?

“That's just MY opinion...”

Since: Jan 07

Location hidden

#115444 Jan 29, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
The record indicates that any particular species has always been the same species. From whatever layer you find a fossil of it to the time it went extinct or until present day. This simple fact negates all your dream-weaving stories.
Then it's odd that no species existing in the fossil record exists now and no species that exists now appears in the fossil record (unless you're using some goofy Creationist definition of "species").
Urban Cowboy wrote:
And then you have actual observable science. Still there is no clear-cut example of any organism changing into something different than what it is. Only variations on a common theme.
Organisms don't evolve individually and the variations within populations are the raw material that feeds the Evolutionary process.
Urban Cowboy wrote:
Common design by a common designer is what is obviously the case. There are several generic design concepts that have been slightly modified for variety. There is no evidence at all that any particular specific design changed its basic form just due to the passage of time. Plus you have all the genetic controls for error correction and maintenance to prevent this from happening. Plus you have genetic entropy and accumulating deleteriuos mutations working against change.
If you have "all the genetic controls for error correction and maintenance to prevent this from happening", how can the Genome be continually degraded by "genetic entropy and accumulating deleteriuos mutations"?
One way or another

United States

#115445 Jan 29, 2013
If you children can refute what I write, I'll stop writing it. You keep lying, claiming you already did, but that's all ya got.
The science of running by Jim Ryan.
Yes, I used to run 10 miles a day for about 2 years. For whatever reason, I started counting a cadence in my head, that matched the cadence of my footfalls and my breathing, which synced body and mind, helping me to get into a trance like state, allowing me to run mile after mile without stress and the last mile I could run almost flat out.
I know they teach different things today, but give my method a try, I think you'll like it. By the way, keep your eyes focused just in front of you, on the ground.
The cadence in running I used to use was, "one two three one", " one two three two", "one two three three", and keep going.
It's a 4 count breathing in and then a 4 count breathing out.
Happy running.
One way or another

United States

#115446 Jan 29, 2013
Come on children, get a brain.
Spin electron rate earth gravity
Original work
By Jim Ryan
Supported by evidence
EDEE!
As everything is connected to everything and everyone, so too must earths spin and rotational rates, as well as electromagnetism and gravity.
From my perspective at this time, the reason science does not understand electromagnetisim or gravity, is because science cannot measure spin rate in electrons, so as to compare with the spin rate of the
Electrons in our bodies-- as a reason we do not feel the spinning of the earth and more.
The possibility exists that electrons spin correlates to either the earths spin rate on its axis, the rotational rate around our barycenter or possibly a combination.
If science were to use earths spin rate first, in doing test within the electromagnetic field, it may reveal much more. Do the electrons in our bodies spin at 1000 miles per hour and is that the reason we don't feel the earth spinning as it does?

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#115447 Jan 29, 2013
One way or another wrote:
Coming depression aftershock
Ya know how I've always been projecting doom and gloom for our economy, well children, its gonna get much worse. The housing market will keep falling, the stock market will crash again and we will suffer another depression, much much deeper than the last Great Depression.
It will happen within 1 to 5 years.
http://w3.newsmax.com/a/aftershockb/video47a....

Gullible people believe anything.
Mugwump

Manchester, UK

#115448 Jan 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Gullible people believe anything.
Have you noticed how he has all but given up with actually engaging in discussion now ?

I have asked him 4 times (my limit) to post what he thinks is his best 'new science' and we can discuss it rationally - the fact that he just goes into 'spamalot' mode suggests that maybe he knows he can't defend any of it.

In some ways this is maybe a pointer that he is'nt completly 'gone' and has some self awareness

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#115449 Jan 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>Gullible people believe anything.
true dat

“Wear white at night.”

Since: Jun 09

Albuquerque

#115450 Jan 29, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
I am the one being objective here! Yes, we observe diversity within species. No, evolution doesn't explain it; in fact, diversity exists in spite of evolution! In every single case, the organism was found as it always is found. You'd think this would be a clue.
Hey, Urban, how you doing.

I see you are still arguing that magic is the best explanation of the diversity of life on earth. Though it is an attractive hypothesis for its simplemindedness I just don't find it to be a very satisfying explanation.

“Don't get me started”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#115451 Jan 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the one being objective here???????
You caused me to spew my Diet Coke all over the place.
Not one single organism is unchanged over evolutionary time period. Even "living fossils" are significantly different from their ancestors in the fossil record.
You'd think this would be a clue.
Be patient. UC is taking classes in biology. He hasn't yet gotten to the chapter on reproduction, where it explains that every generation of each species produces near (but not exactly the same) copies of the parent generation. At some point it will hit him that, OMG, macroevolution is just lots and lots and lots of microevolution.

“Don't get me started”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#115452 Jan 29, 2013
Urban Cowboy wrote:
<quoted text>
The record indicates that any particular species has always been the same species.
So you are saying that humans should still be classified as H. erectus?

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#115453 Jan 29, 2013
Y'all wouldn't strain at a gnat and swallow a camel would ya?

“Don't get me started”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#115454 Jan 29, 2013
01Justsayin wrote:
<quoted text>
Splitting hairs? lol Ya don't say!
Well ya, I'd call it splitting hairs. It seems to me that Jimbo is just hoping to convince people that he is so smart that Newton and Einstein would be impressed with his grand vision. He hopes to deflect people from seeing the poverty of knowledge that he feels is inside him. Dogan would contend that Jimbo has actually succeeded in fooling himself. Only Jimbo can say for sure.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#115455 Jan 29, 2013
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Gullible people believe anything.
Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about.- Chip Todd

“Don't get me started”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#115456 Jan 29, 2013
Mugwump wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you noticed how he has all but given up with actually engaging in discussion now ?
I have asked him 4 times (my limit) to post what he thinks is his best 'new science' and we can discuss it rationally - the fact that he just goes into 'spamalot' mode suggests that maybe he knows he can't defend any of it.
In some ways this is maybe a pointer that he is'nt completly 'gone' and has some self awareness
Bingo!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#115457 Jan 29, 2013
appleboy wrote:
<quoted text>Well ya, I'd call it splitting hairs. It seems to me that Jimbo is just hoping to convince people that he is so smart that Newton and Einstein would be impressed with his grand vision. He hopes to deflect people from seeing the poverty of knowledge that he feels is inside him. Dogan would contend that Jimbo has actually succeeded in fooling himself. Only Jimbo can say for sure.
Ha Nerd King: There can only be one.
One way or another

United States

#115458 Jan 29, 2013
Will

Mid Atlantic mountains width

Original work
By Jim Ryan
Supported by evidence

I told you children to be aware of a game of chess. I kept you looking in one place, making you feel comfortable and getting you to do exactly what you did, thanks.

Now children, ask yourselves, how wide are the mountains at the mid Atlantic ridge? They surely aren't 67,500 miles wide
The width of the mountains should equal the movement of those plates and science claims that in one million years, the plates lose approximately 15 miles, so if the earth is 4.5 billion years old and one million divided into 4.5 billion is 4500, then multiply 15times 4500, which equals 67,500 miles of lost plate. The width of the mountains at the mid atl ridge is minuscule, so please explain how that can be, when the width of the mountain range should be, 67,500. as the mountain range is the only place that shows the addition of material.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 10 min replaytime 160,855
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr DanFromSmithville 18,671
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 1 hr DanFromSmithville 141,278
News Darwin on the rocks (Sep '14) 7 hr Dogen 1,338
god is not real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jun '06) Fri Ooogah Boogah 13,668
Guadeloupe Woman Found (1812 (Mar '10) Apr 23 MikeF 73
Evolution Debunked (Jan '08) Apr 21 rationalreasoner 278
More from around the web