Should evolution be taught in high sc...

Should evolution be taught in high school?

There are 180394 comments on the www.scientificblogging.com story from Feb 24, 2008, titled Should evolution be taught in high school?. In it, www.scientificblogging.com reports that:

Microbiologist Carl Woese is well known as an iconoclast. At 79 years of age, Woese is still shaking things up. Most recently, he stated in an interview with Wired that...

"My feeling is that evolution shouldn't be taught at the lower grades. You don't teach quantum mechanics in the grade schools. One has to be quite educated to work with these concepts; what they pass on as evolution in high schools is nothing but repetitious tripe that teachers don't understand."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.scientificblogging.com.

One way or another

United States

#115081 Jan 24, 2013
It is

Lenski's antibiotic claim.

Original work
By Jim Ryan
Supported by evidence

Lenski and or lederberg should have had the sense to reversed the experiment, to show that when 10 million antibiotic resistantt bacteria were cultured, they produced one that was non antibiotic resistant. One or both should have cultured 10 million bacteria that were non resistant, to see if an antibiotic resistant bacteria developed.
Bacteria may develop both every 10 millionth one as a memory device. If so, that should tell science quite a lot.

One way or another

United States

#115082 Jan 24, 2013
Ok

Immunology

More original science by Jim Ryan

In the following I would suggest that science study children that rarely wear shoes or don't wear shoes at all. I would divide the study into different nations or groups of nations with basically, the same diseases.

I would divide the shoeless-- because of intense poverty, from the people and children that choose to go shoeless and those that rarely or almost never go without shoes.

I might look at the data as the mostly shoeless by desire as mentally and possibly physically, stronger and therefore, more resistant to disease, unless science finds differently.

It may be that kids and people exposed to the pathogens in the dirt, grass and mud puddles on a constant basis, build stronger immune systems, at least for those that choose to go barefoot.
One way or another

United States

#115083 Jan 24, 2013
Yea

The science of running by Jim Ryan.

Yes, I used to run 10 miles a day for about 2 years. For whatever reason, I started counting a cadence in my head, that matched the cadence of my footfalls and my breathing, which synced body and mind, helping me to get into a trance like state, allowing me to run mile after mile without stress and the last mile I could run almost flat out.

I know they teach different things today, but give my method a try, I think you'll like it. By the way, keep your eyes focused just in front of you, on the ground.

The cadence in running I used to use was, "one two three one", " one two three two", "one two three three", and keep going.

It's a 4 count breathing in and then a 4 count breathing out.

Happy running.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#115084 Jan 24, 2013
One way or another wrote:
Ok
Immunology
More original science by Jim Ryan
In the following I would suggest that science study children that rarely wear shoes or don't wear shoes at all. I would divide the study into different nations or groups of nations with basically, the same diseases.
I would divide the shoeless-- because of intense poverty, from the people and children that choose to go shoeless and those that rarely or almost never go without shoes.
I might look at the data as the mostly shoeless by desire as mentally and possibly physically, stronger and therefore, more resistant to disease, unless science finds differently.
It may be that kids and people exposed to the pathogens in the dirt, grass and mud puddles on a constant basis, build stronger immune systems, at least for those that choose to go barefoot.
Who is Jim Ryan?

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#115085 Jan 24, 2013
nemesis wrote:
<quoted text>I was skeptical before it happened. We were not out looking for anything.....it came to us. It forced itself in our world. We crested a hill and there it was on a high power line, it turned. It had a white light on the front and was hovering 15ft off the ground. It than put us to sleep. Prior to that moment my friend said, "There is something in the road ahead." And, then it/they put us to sleep. As we awoke it was in front of us @ 10ft cruisin @ 2-3 mph slowly over us. The bottom of the craft was filled with glowing red panels 6" x 2' not rotating, just slowly passing over us without a sound. I have an extensive background in aviation technologies. So, please don't tell me we were hallucinating. We both know what we saw. My friend could care less about anything that flies and she was curtain it was not of this world. I agreed with her. I have many, many hours of aviation experience. What I saw and felt was beyond words. My conclusion is it was a probe, we created a hill and surprised it. Its reaction was to incapacitate us, see we were not a threat and move on. To be honest we just want answers. We know it difficult to comprehend. It happened. Big C you of all people must understand. I did work in close proximity with nukes for awhile. They said that may be the reason for the encounter.
Emesis, my guess is that you created some meth and that incapacitated you and made you see things.
nemesis

Kansas City, MO

#115086 Jan 24, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Emesis, my guess is that you created some meth and that incapacitated you and made you see things.
Good one! Wrong quess. Try again. This time think....On second thought, Dan go read the Bible and bow your head, you really dont want to know whats out there......it aint God!

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Level 5

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#115087 Jan 24, 2013
nemesis wrote:
<quoted text>Good one! Wrong quess. Try again. This time think....On second thought, Dan go read the Bible and bow your head, you really dont want to know whats out there......it aint God!
Ignorance won't protect you from anything. The ostrich plan of head in sand is not useful no matter how many ostriches find comfort in it.

Better to investigate if there even is an "out there".
nemesis

Kansas City, MO

#115088 Jan 24, 2013
Oogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Ignorance won't protect you from anything. The ostrich plan of head in sand is not useful no matter how many ostriches find comfort in it.
Better to investigate if there even is an "out there".
OB has neurons firing on all cylinders. Honestly, I went to a catholic school for 4 yrs. I don't recall the Bible saying anything about to many galaxies to comprehend "out there"....right? Don't you think that in all Gods infinite wisdom that he would have mentioned to the Bible writers something like, "And, I created an infinite number of galaxies in the universe!" Instead, the world was flat....flat? And, they nailed this guy to a cross...really? Come on, humans are closing the Bible and chasing Alien contact, earth-like worlds "out there" and thinking maybe Aliens are the real creators.....not a fictional character God, like Santa and the Easter Bunny both have religious backgrounds.....weird!

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#115089 Jan 24, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Who is Jim Ryan?
One Way Or Another, aka Pet Whisperer, aka Carpet Whisperer, aka Psychology, aka Jim Ryan, aka resident legitimately batshit insane loon.

“What, me worry?”

Since: Mar 09

I'm a racist caricature!

#115090 Jan 24, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Emesis, my guess is that you created some meth and that incapacitated you and made you see things.
Heh...you called him "puke."
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115091 Jan 25, 2013
And for our entertainment on this thread we got Jimbo's massive Jewish conspiracies and a guy who got abducted by aliens!
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#115092 Jan 25, 2013
nemesis wrote:
I did work in close proximity with nukes for awhile. They said that may be the reason for the encounter.
Probably.

“Don't get me started”

Level 1

Since: Jul 09

Minneapolis

#115093 Jan 25, 2013
Mugwump wrote:
<quoted text>
Hate to say it but am wavering towards Poe again.
NOONE can read the clarifications that have been presented and NOT get it through his thick skull.
Either that or he just doesn't read others posts as it gets in the way of his carpet bombing of nonsense.
If he REALLY doesn't get it he is a danger to himself
He gets it--well, most of the time he gets it as long as there aren't too many numbers to add + subtract. But the issues are less important than the ROLE he wants to establish. People run to get facts, which he ignores. In his mind that's like he's being a parent brushing off a child's silly efforts for attention. It's likely that it's what he got from teachers in his ten failing years of education. He wants to turn that around, and from his point of view it's working.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#115094 Jan 25, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>Who is Jim Ryan?
Didn't he break the 4 min mile? Brit if I remember.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#115095 Jan 25, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>Didn't he break the 4 min mile? Brit if I remember.
No, that was Roger Bannister in 1954.

There WAS a "Jim Ryun" (different spelling) that was the first HIGH SCHOOL athlete to break 4:00 (in 1964).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-minute_mile

Our "Jim Ryan" is only running away from reality.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#115096 Jan 25, 2013
....edit to above..."Jim Ryun" was an ***AMERICAN*** High School student/athlete.
One way or another

United States

#115097 Jan 25, 2013
Proof

Space is not a vacuum.

Science claims space is a vacuum

New science by Jim Ryan

The speed of light test done in a vacuum over 20 miles is total BS, because man can achieve a totally closed and complete vacuum, while space cannot. It has trillions of tons of dust, if you believe in star nurseries, as science claims, coupled with billions of miles of gas clouds, trillions of tons of plasma, from the billions of suns and their ejections, trillions of tons of cosmic rays that all tend to divert and break up light, from as close as the moon, as science proves.

There is no vacuum in space, the kind that man can bring about on earth, ENTIRELY DEVOID of matter, because that is the only way that test could show light traveling at 186,00 miles per second.

Trillions of tons of matter is all through out space, according to science.

How is it scientists are too stupid to understand that there is no vacuum in space?

vacuum[ vak-yoom,-yoo-uh&#8201;m,- yuh&#8201;m ]
noun
1. a space entirely devoid of matter.
2. an enclosed space from which matter, especially air, has been partially removed so that the matter or gas remaining in the space exerts less pressure than the atmosphere (plenum).
3. the state or degree of exhaustion in such an enclosed space.

To have star nurseries,--plural, as science claims and it takes dust beyond measure almost, to create a star, never mind many stars in many nurseries, as science claims, science contradicts itself terribly, while all scientist must be stupid or stoned, not to point it out to science as a whole.

The following is for all you idiot scientists and the morons that believe you. Read the last line carefully.

MISSING DARK MATTER LOCATED - INTER-GALACTIC SPACE IS FILLED WITH DARK MATTER

On many science web sites, science claims there is almost no matter in space. Science lies constantly

Researchers at IPMU and Nagoya University used large-scale computer simulations and recent observational data of gravitational lensing to reveal how dark matter is distributed around galaxies.

Galaxies have no definite "edges", the new research concludes. Instead galaxies have long outskirts of dark matter that extend to their nearby galaxies; the inter-galactic space is not empty but filled with dark matter.

http://www.ipmu.jp/node/1222
Elohim

Branford, CT

#115098 Jan 25, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that was Roger Bannister in 1954.
There WAS a "Jim Ryun" (different spelling) that was the first HIGH SCHOOL athlete to break 4:00 (in 1964).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-minute_mile
Our "Jim Ryan" is only running away from reality.
Thank you for clearing that up.
One way or another

United States

#115099 Jan 25, 2013
Another

Speed of light failure
Science claims to have proven that speed of light is 186,000 miles per sec, according to the tests they claim to have done in its 20 mile long test chamber. To achieve that perfect goal of 186,000 miles per second, the test chamber of science would have to be ideal conditions.

Too bad science fell way short on its test from the earth to the moon and back, where science claimed it took a FEW seconds for a photon to make it into the collector. A FEW seconds means 3 or more seconds, meaning the laser light took between half a second, to as much as 2 seconds too long.

Once I revealed such, science removed that web page.

The only real test science did in space for speed of light was a failure.

Of course, science claims space is full of dark MATTER.

http://www.ipmu.jp/node/1222

Science lies as it chooses.
One way or another

United States

#115100 Jan 25, 2013
Justice

Spin electron rate earth gravity

Original work
By Jim Ryan
Supported by evidence

EDEE!

As everything is connected to everything and everyone, so too must earths spin and rotational rates, as well as electromagnetism and gravity.

From my perspective at this time, the reason science does not understand electromagnetisim or gravity, is because science cannot measure spin rate in electrons, so as to compare with the spin rate of the
Electrons in our bodies-- as a reason we do not feel the spinning of the earth and more.

The possibility exists that electrons spin correlates to either the earths spin rate on its axis, the rotational rate around our barycenter or possibly a combination.

If science were to use earths spin rate first, in doing test within the electromagnetic field, it may reveal much more. Do the electrons in our bodies spin at 1000 miles per hour and is that the reason we don't feel the earth spinning as it does?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 23 min One way or another 61,513
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 49 min THE LONE WORKER 220,692
One species or three 6 hr pshun2404 1
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 7 hr djc 160,326
Curious dilemma about DNA 10 hr Dogen 6
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 12 hr Dogen 2,699
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 13 hr Dogen 28,323
More from around the web