"However, they still contained what appear to be the proteins you would expect to find in living osteocytes, as well as at least some remnants of DNA. That’s the amazing part of their results. These bones are supposed to be more than 65 million years old, yet they hold fossilized remains of cells that still contain their proteins and some DNA."
How much? How much?
65 million years old
"some" DNA. They can't sequence it therefore it is NOT full strands of DNA. Even YOU claim that would be impossible.
Further your source is a fundy who is not qualified to deal with paleontology any more than I am. His claim to fame is writing pseudoscience text books for home schoolers.