Come on now, that's just ridiculous. Science confirms the Bible in more ways than science confirms macroevolution.
Macroevolution has BILLIONS (literally) of points of evidence. Only a handful of things in the bible have been researched and some have been shown to have no foundation whatsoever (e.g. global flood).
<quoted text> Creation is a better scientific explanation for life than evolution is.
No. Creation has no scientific evidence. Creation is not a scientific theory. Creation cannot be falsified. Creation fails the law of parsimony. Creation makes no predictions,.........
<quoted text>, Why? Because there is no mechanism for macroevolution to occur
<quoted text>because we have never seen a genetic mutation lead to macroevolution even after extensive experiments.
False. We HAVE seen EXACTLY this.
<quoted text> Why? Because the fossil record points to all the various plants and animals staying the same kind throughout their history with some of the "oldest" fossils looking the same as current.
False, all forms of life for which we have a good history have show evolution over time.
<quoted text> Why? Because DNA contains information which only comes from intelligence.
Unproven unlikely. DNA appears to be a naturally formed chemical compound.
<quoted text> Why? Because the laws of physics say that entropy moves from the energy source to the system receiving it.
This has been refuted so many times it is not worth addressing again.
<quoted text> (And dozens of other key reasons.) Don't get me started.
We have seen your sense of humor,... I mean "reasons".