Because you had nothing. You know what I'm talking about.<quoted text>
Examples have been provided - you dismiss them
But you haven't even got to the point where you can provide any examples of predictions / breakthroughs based on creation science - want to give it another go ?
Obviously just saying creation science is credited for all accomplishments is meaningless - we asked (again and again) for specific examples
A. Naturalistic vertical evolution. Macroevolution. Transmutation of Species. The notion that a fish evolved over billions of years into a reptile and then into a bird and a mammal is pure fantasy with no evidence. This is fantasy.
B. Not adaptation. Not genetic variation. Not Microevolution. Not simple genetic variety. This is part of the creation. This is what we observe. But fish have always been fish. Birds have always been birds. Humans have always been humans. That is what we observe!
These (A. and B.) are two entirely different concepts. Stop equivocating!