The hope of evolutionists

Feb 22, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Pravda

The recent media splash about finding the hypothetical common ancestor of all mammals is based upon nothing more than the evolutionary argument that DNA and biological similarities between species is evidence for common ancestry.

Comments
81 - 99 of 99 Comments Last updated Mar 9, 2013
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Mar 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>How did you conclude that? I know: it's what you want to believe!
Because you say you have the right to deny reality.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Mar 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it your assertion that no mathematicians have ever modeled something mathematically and been in errors?
Of course they have!

http://sci.physics.narkive.com/ckyGgFUp/the-p...

Ain't that right, Shoob?

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Mar 7, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they have!
http://sci.physics.narkive.com/ckyGgFUp/the-p...
Ain't that right, Shoob?
That is a beautiful link!

Where did you get that from? Don't tell me that Shoob supplied that himself in the past, it would be too funny.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Mar 7, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
That is a beautiful link!
Where did you get that from? Don't tell me that Shoob supplied that himself in the past, it would be too funny.
It *was* originally supplied by Shoob himself, many moons ago. Shoob is Eugene Schubert. Despite being a fundie fruitbasket he is a bona-fide mathematician. It's just that AJP rejected his math paper for submission for some strange reason.

What else would you expect from someone who got the receiving end of a restraining order from a fundamentalist SDA church for being too fundie for them?

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Mar 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
It *was* originally supplied by Shoob himself, many moons ago. Shoob is Eugene Schubert. Despite being a fundie fruitbasket he is a bona-fide mathematician. It's just that AJP rejected his math paper for submission for some strange reason.
What else would you expect from someone who got the receiving end of a restraining order from a fundamentalist SDA church for being too fundie for them?
And he's quite proud of the fact that he's a loon.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Mar 7, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
It *was* originally supplied by Shoob himself, many moons ago. Shoob is Eugene Schubert. Despite being a fundie fruitbasket he is a bona-fide mathematician. It's just that AJP rejected his math paper for submission for some strange reason.
What else would you expect from someone who got the receiving end of a restraining order from a fundamentalist SDA church for being too fundie for them?
Thanks for the reply. I did already know that Eugene Schubert was our Shoobie doobie doo. I love all of the replies to him and about him. I have a SDA brother and know how crazy they can be. Some of them can be quite bright and still believe their nonsense. I would not put Shoob in the "quite bright" category at all.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#89
Mar 7, 2013
 
I dimly recall Polymath thinking he was quite bright in the area of math at least. It's just that his fundamentalism gets in the way of everything.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#90
Mar 7, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
I dimly recall Polymath thinking he was quite bright in the area of math at least. It's just that his fundamentalism gets in the way of everything.
That could be. I have never looked at any of his mathematical claims. You are right about how preconceived notions can make it all but impossible to argue effectively. And look at the two the two ideas he has the most trouble with, Einstein's relativity and Darwin's evolution. It would be all but impossible to find a concept that has been more thoroughly tested and repeatedly confirmed than those two, with perhaps the exception of quantum dynamics and I bet Shoob has a problem with that concept too.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#91
Mar 7, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
That could be. I have never looked at any of his mathematical claims. You are right about how preconceived notions can make it all but impossible to argue effectively. And look at the two the two ideas he has the most trouble with, Einstein's relativity and Darwin's evolution. It would be all but impossible to find a concept that has been more thoroughly tested and repeatedly confirmed than those two, with perhaps the exception of quantum dynamics and I bet Shoob has a problem with that concept too.
And he does. He claims quantum science proves magical god-poofing.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#92
Mar 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
I have never looked at any of his mathematical claims.
That's a plus for you since you don't qualify to critique mathematics.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#93
Mar 7, 2013
 
Subduction Zone wrote:
And look at the two the two ideas he has the most trouble with, Einstein's relativity and Darwin's evolution.
There's nothing wrong with Einstein's equations. However, Einstein mistakenly believed that nonlinear versions of the Lorentz transformation equations couldn't possibly exist. To my credit, I saw through the popular subterfuge when I was a high school sophomore taking second year algebra.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#94
Mar 7, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>There's nothing wrong with Einstein's equations. However, Einstein mistakenly believed that nonlinear versions of the Lorentz transformation equations couldn't possibly exist. To my credit, I saw through the popular subterfuge when I was a high school sophomore taking second year algebra.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TBT...

(ahem)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#95
Mar 7, 2013
 
Sorry, should have responded to this post:
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>That's a plus for you since you don't qualify to critique mathematics.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TBT...

(ahem)
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#96
Mar 7, 2013
 
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
And he does. He claims quantum science proves magical god-poofing.
Liar.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#97
Mar 7, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>That's a plus for you since you don't qualify to critique mathematics.
How do you know? You have shown yourself to be an idiot countless times over. Who is to say that your math is not the math of an idiot too. They seemed to think so at the physics journal you submitted an article to.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#99
Mar 8, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>There's nothing wrong with Einstein's equations. However, Einstein mistakenly believed that nonlinear versions of the Lorentz transformation equations couldn't possibly exist. To my credit, I saw through the popular subterfuge when I was a high school sophomore taking second year algebra.
Um, yes there is, they don't work in black holes.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#100
Mar 8, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Liar.
Not entirely, Einstein actually couldn't understand quantum physics so he dismissed it completely.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#101
Mar 8, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>Liar.
Shoob, why are you, a known and confirmed liar accusing other people of lying?

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#102
Mar 9, 2013
 
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text>That's a plus for you since you don't qualify to critique mathematics.
Sez the arrogant, self-appointed authority on everything.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••