Which do you consider real / better *...

Which do you consider real / better *natural science*?

Created by humble brother on Feb 9, 2014

2 votes

Click on an option to vote

Explained occurrences also observed

Explained occurrences only believed

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#21 Feb 10, 2014
humble brother wrote:
Can science explain gravitation without any observations of occurrences of objects gravitating?
I already answered this question.
humble brother wrote:
Can science explain evolution without any observations of populations evolving?
Where are you coming from? Even the Bible acknowledges biological change over time.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#22 Feb 11, 2014
humble brother wrote:
<quoted text>
You haven't answered the question of this poll? Why is that?
Now you made a claim. I will now ask you to present your simple rational question that you claim I wouldn't be able to answer. So, what's your simple rational question?
It will not be a surprise if you can produce none. You got running mouth and empty hands again?:)
Sure I answered you:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T17...

Don't have to jump through your hoops. Yours are borken.(shrug)
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#23 Feb 11, 2014
humble brother wrote:
Your link didn't seem to work.
My website is under attack. http://everythingimportant.org/evolution takes about a minute to open. Also check out http://everythingimportant.org/devolution when that will be possible.

“I am the great an powerful Ny!”

Since: Dec 06

Lebanon, PA

#24 Feb 11, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> My website is under attack. http://everythingimportant.org/evolution takes about a minute to open. Also check out http://everythingimportant.org/devolution when that will be possible.
Now we have two reasons not to go to them.
humble brother

Finland

#25 Feb 16, 2014
The Dude wrote:
Sure I answered you:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T17...
Don't have to jump through your hoops. Yours are borken.(shrug)
On that page the only response from you to me is this:
The Dude wrote:
Oh look, bumble bro's back, using the "how do you know where you there" argument again. Since natural selection has been observed in living populations that's not a problem. And also since ALL fossils fall inside with what evolution would predict then there's not a problem there either.
When you finally find yourself a pre-Cambrian rabbit or fossil with feathers and three middle-ear bones then your argument will have merit. Until then you're just another fundie apologist pretending not to be a fundie.
What particularly in this post of yours do you consider an answer to the presented question?
Could you be specific this time instead your usual religiously ambiguous self?
humble brother

Finland

#26 Feb 16, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I already answered this question.
<quoted text> Where are you coming from? Even the Bible acknowledges biological change over time.
I think I may have misunderstood your initial post :)
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#27 Feb 18, 2014
humble brother wrote:
<quoted text>
On that page the only response from you to me is this:
<quoted text>
What particularly in this post of yours do you consider an answer to the presented question?
Could you be specific this time instead your usual religiously ambiguous self?
Actually it's not the only response. I wasn't pointing you to a particular post, I was pointing you to the entire thread. In which I, and numerous others took you to task for your gross misunderstandings of the scientific method.

Not surprising you missed it, despite BEING in that thread yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 11 min Dogen 81,680
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 49 min ChromiuMan 164,276
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 7 hr River Tam 33,031
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 19 hr Eagle 12 - 2,191
Did humans come from Sturgeons? Oct 16 Science 1
Proof humans come from Tennessee Oct 16 Science 1
Science News (Sep '13) Oct 14 Science 4,005
More from around the web