...and I suppose you talking about your disbelief in skydaddys and enjoyment of licking ice cream is the reflection of your scientific credibility and a demonstration of you being a frustrated evotard looser. LOL! I love it! Ridicule on!!! ROLF!<quoted text>
Hows my little self licking ice cream cone head doing today?
still posting irrelevant links to try to support your fantasy of quasi-scientific intellectualism? You should find yourself a nice street corner and bring ya soapbox and flyers from creation.tard
so you can preach your plethora of idiom psychotic gobbledygook
to the first grade special ed class, with a little luck and if you pay them ...they might believe your hilarious arboreal christian
pseudo-scientific stand up act of tragic comedy.
I know we will tie a pork chop around you neck and get you to lecture the dogs with incantations and heel clicking magic skydaddy creation , you're sure to be a big hit with them you and your pork chop. And speaking of hand waving, you sure look like a do do bird trying to get airborne over there, but don't let this "what's wrong with this picture" picture of yourself get in the way of your magical persona you got going in your "own mind".
But we can tell you from over here you're about the funniest creationist clown we ever seen!
A confirmation of a hypothesis can be generated on any basis from abiogenesis to the fall of Rome, and is testable and falsifiable, regardless of your ignorance and ability to be an evo parrot puppet.
Adaption is not what results in common ancestors between deers and whales. Adaptation gives you fitter deers and whales.
Creation is true if the genome is designed to maintain organisms within their familial group/kind. The fact that TOE is challenged by the validation of such a prediction is an added plus.
For now I am the one that has presented research that speaks to restrictions and limits to the genomes inability to adapt. Evos have presented their opinion and every side wind they can think of, and therefore have no more credibility than a squarking parrot that can repeat "they said so".
There is evidence in nature of the genomes limits to adaptability.
In gradually deteriorating environments, survival at lethal stress may be procured by prior adaptation to sublethal stress through genetic correlation. Neither the standing genetic variation of small populations nor the mutation supply of large populations, however, may be sufficient to provide evolutionary rescue for most populations.
There is empirical evidence that the genome has limits to its use of even beneficial mutations in a declining fitness landscape.
Genome deterioration: loss of repeated sequences and accumulation of junk DNA.
Genetic code of human race is deteriorating due to environmental factors
Evidence for Widespread Degradation of Gene Control Regions in Hominid Genomes
Diminishing Returns Epistasis Among Beneficial Mutations Decelerates Adaptation
Negative Epistasis Between Beneficial Mutations in an Evolving Bacterial Population
All data demonstrates an organism has limits to it ability to adapt. Breeders have known it for centuries but scientists don't let a little thing like direct observational evidence get in the way of a great story.