Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 219597 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98230 Aug 20, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>No, so called "polystrate" fossils have been explained hundreds of times.

There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie.

Please. Show evidence for this. If you want to make me laugh link some creatard source. I know you cannot find a source that uses science to support this latest idiocy.
"There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie."

"A remarkable fossil find has been found in Peru: 346 whales buried in diatomaceous earth. The preservation of the whales is so pristine and complete, the authors of the paper in the Feb. 2004 issue of Geology1 conclude that the whales had to be buried rapidly, in days or weeks. If so, it represents a rate of accumulation of diatoms many times higher than what occurs in modern oceans.
The authors point out some amazing things about this fossil deposit:
Condition: The whale skeletons are “preserved in pristine condition (bones articulated [i.e., still assembled] or at least closely associated), in some cases including preserved baleen.”
Fine details:“The most complete whale (WCBa 20) was fully articulated; the microscopic detail of its baleen was preserved … and there is black, heavy-mineral replacement of the spinal cord and some intervertebral disks. There were no similar minerals in the surrounding sediment. These nonbony tissues were still present when the whale was completely buried.” Other instances of baleen, the delicate straining structure of the whale’s mouth, were also found.
Vertical extent:“The 346 whales within ~1.5 km2 of surveyed surface were not buried as an event, but were distributed uninterrupted through an 80-m-thick sedimentary section.” Since they were found uniformly distributed from bottom to top of the formation, the conditions in which they were buried must have also been uniform.
Unlaminated strata:“The diatomaceous sediment lacks repeating primary laminations, but instead is mostly massive, with irregular laminations and speckles.” In other words, it was not due to a cyclic process, like the annual climate change that produces tree rings.
Lack of bioturbation: Small organisms have not altered the deposit.“There is no evidence for bioturbation by invertebrates in the whale-bearing sediment.” Apparently they didn’t have the chance, it happened so fast.
Intact diatoms:“If most diatoms dissolve before preservation in the sediment, one would find frustules in all stages of dissolution. Diatoms in the Pisco diatomaceous sediment are often broken, but SEMstudy indicated fine preservation, with no significant evidence of dissolution.… In the shallow-water Pisco Formation, the diatoms were probably buried too quickly for much dissolution to occur.” The authors point out that in contemporary diatom deposits, only 2–3% of the frustules (glass shells) usually remain undissolved, up to 24% in special cases in Antarctica."

http://crev.info/2004/02/hundreds_of_whales_b...
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98231 Aug 20, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>No, so called "polystrate" fossils have been explained hundreds of times.

There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie.

Please. Show evidence for this. If you want to make me laugh link some creatard source. I know you cannot find a source that uses science to support this latest idiocy.
"There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie."

"‘We knew it was a great find,’ said paleontologist Leonard Brand about the fossil whales he saw in Peru in 1999, 350 km (200 miles) south of Lima, the capital. Eagerly he organized a team of creationist research scientists. They recently published their findings in the secular journal Geology.1,2,3
Overall, they found 346 whales within a 1.5-km2 (370-acre) area, buried in an 80-m (260-ft) thick layer of sedimentary rock called diatomite. This layer is part of the Pisco Formation, which varies in thickness from 200–1,000 m (650–3,300 ft).

Diatomite is sedimentary rock containing a high percentage of fossil diatoms—small single-celled algae, which commonly live near the ocean surface. The layer of diatomite in Peru has 5 to 10% clay and abundant volcanic ash.

Today, when diatoms die, their silica skeletons accumulate on the ocean floor. One gram (0.035 oz.) of diatomite may contain up to 400 million skeletons.4 Diatomite sediment normally accumulates slowly—only a few centimetres per thousand years.1Even where the rate is higher, such as in some shallow-water areas, accumulation is still slow. For example, in the fjords of British Columbia, diatoms and clay accumulate at 2.5–5.0 mm (0.1–0.2 inches) per year.2

Also today, when a whale carcass sinks to the bottom of the ocean, many kinds of scavengers quickly attack and colonize it. And in their quest for food, some scavengers churn up the adjacent sediments.5

However, in Peru, the fossilized whales and diatoms were well preserved and the whale skeletons were mostly intact. There was no evidence of normal decay, such as wormholes, barnacle encrustations or general degradation. Neither was there any sign that organisms had churned up the adjacent sediment."

http://creation.mo bi/dead-whales-telling-tales
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98232 Aug 20, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
That's Tater Salad to you bub.

"The evidence of marine animals that has been found could only be created by immense, recent, oceanic tidal waves. If the floods across North America were caused by ice-domed lakes, they would have washed away all evidence of these whale bones and other marine materials; none of the floods would reach Mexico or the Bahamas."

This is bad, it takes none of the actual flood events into account.
The fountains of the deep erupting.
The raising up the land and lowering the ocean floors.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98233 Aug 20, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>Martin Luther,

On the Jews and Their Lies (German: Von den Jüden und iren Lügen; in modern spelling Von den Juden und ihren Lügen) is a 65,000-word antisemitic treatise written in 1543 by the German Reformation leader Martin Luther.

In the treatise, Luther describes Jews as a "base, whoring people, that is, no people of God, and their boast of lineage, circumcision, and law must be accounted as filth."[1] Luther wrote that they are "full of the devil's feces ... which they wallow in like swine,"[2] and the synagogue is an "incorrigible whore and an evil slut".[3]

In the first ten sections of the treatise, Luther expounds, at considerable length, upon his views concerning Jews and Judaism and how these compare against Christians and Christianity. Following this exposition, Section XI of the treatise advises Christians to carry out seven remedial actions. These are

1.for Jewish synagogues and schools to be burned to the ground, and the remnants buried out of sight;
2.for houses owned by Jews to be likewise razed, and the owners made to live in agricultural outbuildings;
3.for their religious writings to be taken away;
4.for rabbis to be forbidden to preach, and to be executed if they do;
5.for safe conduct on the roads to be abolished for Jews;
6.for usury to be prohibited, and for all silver and gold to be removed and "put aside for safekeeping"; and
7.for the Jewish population to be put to work as agricultural slave laborers.[4]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_...

Note that this was about 300 years before Darwin.

I'm simply trying to bring to light the racist views of the father of the Protestant Church(s).

If you want to remain eyes wide shut go ahead.
"I'm simply trying to bring to light the racist views of the father of the Protestant Church(s)."

Thanks for that. I did not know that.

Again I was scolded for posting an article that called evolution racist.
There is racism running all through it.
But as you pointed out racism is every where including religious houses.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98234 Aug 20, 2013
Jay-Gee1992 wrote:
what do young Creationists have to say about Carbon dating?
I only date within my age group. Cabon dating does nothing for me but to each there own. So if carbon is ok with it and that's what you want to do I say go for it.
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98235 Aug 20, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>The act of creation would need time also under your rules, but you'll let that slide because your god is always allowed special exemptions from any rules you make.

Time is not required to exist before time starts as that would be a paradox - your claim.

Also science is fine with the existence of time before our universe, in which case time did not start with our universe. All depends on what occurred at the point of singularity. You say invisible wizard. Maybe.

It used evolution though.
"The act of creation would need time also under your rules"

Incorrect. Time was created by God outside (because it didn't exist yet) our universe. God is not held to the law of Physics that he creates for the universe.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98236 Aug 20, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Much more. It is backed by evidence. It's astonishing that a sentient being is incapable of understanding this simple concept.
What evidence? you and the other idiots pool your intelligence and come up with evidence of the life giving sludge.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98237 Aug 20, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality isn't real therefore Goddidit with magic.
or your goo didit with magic
Level 1

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#98238 Aug 20, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>Don't worry, I addressed them on page 1:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T9Q...

Of course you can pretend to ignore the HIGHLY racist position of Genesis though, where it started with one pair of "perfect" humans (mostly depicted as white, what, with being made in GODS IMAGE and all) and then it allegedly went all downhill from there.
Sorry Genesis never talks about skin color

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98241 Aug 20, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Much more. It is backed by evidence. It's astonishing that a sentient being is incapable of understanding this simple concept.
Please , tell me about this life giving slime, and how it came to life, and how you are a descendant of a rat!

“ad victoriam”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#98242 Aug 20, 2013
Croco_Duck wrote:
<quoted text>
It has nothing to do with humans.
Certainly it does, most assuredly , but not entirely under our control.
The catch phrase is that we have the ability to change things.
Sometimes it even works out, as planned.

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98243 Aug 20, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
"We've done the paternity tests, we've traced back the genealogy, and we’re doing all kinds of in-depth testing of the human species. People are apes and the descendants of apes, who were the descendants of rat-like primates, who were the children of reptiles, who were the spawn of amphibians, who were the terrestrial progeny of fish, who came from worms, who were assembled from single-celled microorganisms, who were the products of chemistry. Your daddy was a film of chemical slime on a Hadean rock, and he didn't care about you—he was only obeying the laws of thermodynamics.
You are you not because of some grand design but because of chance, contingency, and selection.--P.Z. Myers
http://www.beliefnet.com/Faiths/So-Alone.aspx
9. man
8.apes
7.rat like creatures!
6.reptiles
5. amphibians
4. fish
3. worms
2.micro organisms
1. slime that became alive

Who believes this?

how did the worms evolve into worm eating fish?

Level 2

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#98244 Aug 20, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
Certainly it does, most assuredly , but not entirely under our control.
The catch phrase is that we have the ability to change things.
Sometimes it even works out, as planned.
Just imagine when humans first entered North America from Asia. Paleo-Indians settle in America over 10,000 years ago. They find lakes, many of them teeming with fish.

Where did the fish come from?

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#98245 Aug 20, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
9. man
8.apes
7.rat like creatures!
6.reptiles
5. amphibians
4. fish
3. worms
2.micro organisms
1. slime that became alive
Who believes this?
how did the worms evolve into worm eating fish?
It is believed that humans and Neanderthals share a common ancestor....probably Homo-heidelbergensis.

We know for a fact that humans carry a small percentage of Neanderthal genes/blood. This simply means that humans and Neanderthals mated and produced fertile offspring long long ago. This opens up our lineage to other Homo genus' down the line.

This also incidentally blows the Adam and Eve myth out of the water...big repercussions there.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#98246 Aug 20, 2013
Croco_Duck wrote:
<quoted text>
Just imagine when humans first entered North America from Asia. Paleo-Indians settle in America over 10,000 years ago. They find lakes, many of them teeming with fish.
Where did the fish come from?
And then there are the lakes with no fish in them....how did that happen??

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Evolution is true.....

#98247 Aug 20, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Please , tell me about this life giving slime, and how it came to life, and how you are a descendant of a rat!
We don't know yet....any problem with that??

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Level 6

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#98248 Aug 20, 2013
The Almighty Tzar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The act of creation would need time also under your rules"
Incorrect. Time was created by God outside (because it didn't exist yet) our universe. God is not held to the law of Physics that he creates for the universe.
Bravo

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98249 Aug 20, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
It is believed that humans and Neanderthals share a common ancestor....probably Homo-heidelbergensis.
We know for a fact that humans carry a small percentage of Neanderthal genes/blood. This simply means that humans and Neanderthals mated and produced fertile offspring long long ago. This opens up our lineage to other Homo genus' down the line.
This also incidentally blows the Adam and Eve myth out of the water...big repercussions there.
Good Lord! you speak of the first two human beings as a myth and you believe that slime turned into worms then turned into fish that ate the worms!

Without question you guys will say and believe in anything to defend your beliefs.

“GOD SO LOVED US”

Level 6

Since: Aug 08

He Gave His SON,JESUS Christ

#98250 Aug 20, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
9. man
8.apes
7.rat like creatures!
6.reptiles
5. amphibians
4. fish
3. worms
2.micro organisms
1. slime that became alive
Who believes this?
how did the worms evolve into worm eating fish?
Far as I know there is no missing link ..oh wait ..that's yesterday's theory ..the new one is common ancestors.

There is no evidence of evolution ..between species ..

Man is man..always was man ..created by God as man ..

Level 2

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#98251 Aug 20, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't know yet....any problem with that??
My point exactly, you don't know because there's no science what so ever to support it,...yet cling to it you do. Why?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 min Dogen 57,933
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr Hedonist Heretic 27,252
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 3 hr MADRONE 159,234
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 8 hr Subduction Zone 1,782
News Intelligent Design Education Day Sun replaytime 2
News Betsy DeVos' Code Words for Creationism Offshoo... Feb 16 scientia potentia... 1
Are Asians/whites more evolved? (Sep '07) Feb 15 bofo 1,756
More from around the web