"There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie."<quoted text>No, so called "polystrate" fossils have been explained hundreds of times.
There is no whale "polystrate" fossil. That is a cretard lie.
Please. Show evidence for this. If you want to make me laugh link some creatard source. I know you cannot find a source that uses science to support this latest idiocy.
"A remarkable fossil find has been found in Peru: 346 whales buried in diatomaceous earth. The preservation of the whales is so pristine and complete, the authors of the paper in the Feb. 2004 issue of Geology1 conclude that the whales had to be buried rapidly, in days or weeks. If so, it represents a rate of accumulation of diatoms many times higher than what occurs in modern oceans.
The authors point out some amazing things about this fossil deposit:
Condition: The whale skeletons are âpreserved in pristine condition (bones articulated [i.e., still assembled] or at least closely associated), in some cases including preserved baleen.â
Fine details:âThe most complete whale (WCBa 20) was fully articulated; the microscopic detail of its baleen was preserved â¦ and there is black, heavy-mineral replacement of the spinal cord and some intervertebral disks. There were no similar minerals in the surrounding sediment. These nonbony tissues were still present when the whale was completely buried.â Other instances of baleen, the delicate straining structure of the whaleâs mouth, were also found.
Vertical extent:âThe 346 whales within ~1.5 km2 of surveyed surface were not buried as an event, but were distributed uninterrupted through an 80-m-thick sedimentary section.â Since they were found uniformly distributed from bottom to top of the formation, the conditions in which they were buried must have also been uniform.
Unlaminated strata:âThe diatomaceous sediment lacks repeating primary laminations, but instead is mostly massive, with irregular laminations and speckles.â In other words, it was not due to a cyclic process, like the annual climate change that produces tree rings.
Lack of bioturbation: Small organisms have not altered the deposit.âThere is no evidence for bioturbation by invertebrates in the whale-bearing sediment.â Apparently they didnât have the chance, it happened so fast.
Intact diatoms:âIf most diatoms dissolve before preservation in the sediment, one would find frustules in all stages of dissolution. Diatoms in the Pisco diatomaceous sediment are often broken, but SEMstudy indicated fine preservation, with no significant evidence of dissolution.â¦ In the shallow-water Pisco Formation, the diatoms were probably buried too quickly for much dissolution to occur.â The authors point out that in contemporary diatom deposits, only 2â3% of the frustules (glass shells) usually remain undissolved, up to 24% in special cases in Antarctica."