So we began a couple of days back with your claims of scientists "admitting" things that are in fact quite openly discussed and not even controversial in modern science.<quoted text>
Let me see, you type in Dino and Bible and you get X no. of links. Really tough for me to figure that you were gaming me DFS. I read the contrary liberal views also before I replied to you.
Suggesting I am a liar is over the top. You're mistaken.
You then followed up with the claim that scientists were having "cold sweats" over empirical evidence when in fact they are perfectly comfortable with the empirical evidence. Asked to provide verified evidence of a single fossil appearing before its possible antecedents (a true falsification of evolution), you have provided nothing. You cannot, of course.
Strike three, you claim erroneously that evolution is a "liberal viewpoint". Its funny how you guys label evolution liberal when you are not claiming its fascist. You can't have it both ways.
Very telling slip up though.
You have claimed that radiometric dating is so bad that it's embarrassing to geologists. To back that up all you could offer are discredited RATE findings, while ignoring the vast majority of measurements which show concordance to within 10% using multiple methods.
You have claimed that "the" great unconformity shows the original Earth "that Adam stood on" while ignoring the fact the even the original so called Great ones were in two different places and geological periods, and many others have been since found. And that they are easily explained by periodic rises and falls in elevation leading to cycles of erosion and deposition.
In short, you give it your best shot but merely show how superficial the arguments you buy into really are. The progenitors of those arguments are charlatans. I followed one right through to the end, the silly controversy over magnetic reversals, through the thoroughly disingenuous twisting of the work of Coe and Prevot, and the continued lies even after their errors (was it Snelling? trying to remember the lying prick's name) were pointed out. But I bet its another one you bought into uncritically.
YEC is an utter crock. Its claims never stack up. End of story.