Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 221445 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84882 Apr 5, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>HAAHAHAHAH!! Thanks for starting my day off with a laugh!
it's always nice to have a psychotic break in the morning...

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84883 Apr 5, 2013
CORRECTION to the dude on my last quote to you.

YOU CAN'T CHOOSE OPPOSING ANSWERS AND CALL IT THE TRUTH!

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84884 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And i am also telling you that, all languages developed from one or more languages.
The French you are ranting about, had/ has alot of roots from Latin.
So, if French is unique to France, England is not an exception.
Yes, that’s what I said. Funny how you try obfuscating your lies and confusion with fact when it starts getting to hot for you

There is no ranting in my post there is FACT, you may consider it ranting because it blows your conception of English right out of the water but who cares about your idiotic ideas?

Jeesus fooking christ on a crutch. You still have not looked up the meaning of unique. You still use it to misrepresent you stupid ideas, you are looking sillier by the post. I even poste an alternative word that you could use,“developed” but you seem to have ignored that.

Here let me make it easy for you

UNIQUE – Adj - Being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else

Now I have shown you that English is in some respect like French, German, Dutch, Danish, Latin and Greek there are also a few other influences there –

i.e;. NOT UNIQUE

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#84885 Apr 5, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>There are no absolutes.
Are you sure?

;-)

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84886 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Lastly, all world languages had/ has one or more roots or influences from one another.
English is NOT the only language with that issue, others are.
Stop your rantings and face reality, English originated in England.
Yes I have been trying to explain that very concept to you for 5 months – good that it has eventually got through your thick skull. Now you don’t have very far to go to get this part of you life sorted out. Just look up (and at least try to understand) the meaning of “unique”

No English did not ORIGINATE in England, it developed in England, it originated from several different languages

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84887 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Why do we have several subjects and topics in a course?
A good thinker knows the right answer(s) to give.
You are clueless.
Sorry if my answers confuse your tiny mind

You asked a question, I gave you an answer that was factual. You changes your question. You were told how stupid you were being so you changed your question again

Do you really think that everyone is a stupid as you?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84888 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Now answer the question, posted to you.
If you don't, the handwriting is already clear, English originated in England ( no arguments about that, except any one wanted to).
I answered the question

You had no counter for the answer so changed the question

I told you that you were ignorant in moving the goalposts

So you changed your question again

You were shown that each of you questions (and you word selection) was pathetic and irrelevant

SO WHICH FOOKING QUESTION DO YOU WANT ANSWERING?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84889 Apr 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you sure?
;-)
Absolutely

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#84890 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are dishonest, hope you know that?
So, all the writers of Jesus, that wrote about Christ were all drunk?
Hmmm, impossible!
Pay attention.

There are absolutely NO contemporary accounts of your Nazarene.

None.

Zip.

Nada.

Zilch.

The alleged tales of Josephus and Tacitus are proven forgeries, written centuries later.

QUIT QUOTING THEM!! THEY DON'T FRIGGING COUNT!!!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84891 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The first part of your comment is what I have been replying to your stupid rants for the last 5 months, glad that you are capable of actual learning, even if it does take a long, long time.
As for your claim of “origin” I see you still have not yet looked up the meaning of the word and we know how stupid you are but that is no excuse for your ignorance when you have previously been told how and where to educate yourself. While you are at it you could look up the meaning of the word “developed” and consider the word in place of your totally incorrect usage of “origin”. You could also try reading a couple of the links I have provided on the origin of the English language. A little self education would do you no harm whatsoever, in fact it may actually benefit you and stop you looking as stupid.
BTW, you do not use your eyes to think, you use your brain and I, like many other people do there best thinking with their eyes closed, it cuts out distractions and often means you can consider deeper meanings and be more analytical. However if you can only think with your eyes open then it does explain why you are so stupid.
From your premise, there is nothing like origin but development.
You are fouled for ignorance.
Both words goes together, all languages are one way or the other, connected together.
But where it originated and developed, remain intact.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84892 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are dishonest, hope you know that?
So, all the writers of Jesus, that wrote about Christ were all drunk?
Hmmm, impossible!
Or high. Or insane. Or power hungry with a little knowledge of how to control the weak minded.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84893 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it's always nice to have a psychotic break in the morning...
Sometime I wonder what century these fundies live in.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84894 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Adoption???= Acceptance – NOT origin
So you are now saying that English was not the “original” English language but was adopted (accepted) by the English
I really do with you could make up your mind what you actually do mean
Listen to moron, I may be dyslexic but that does not mean I don’t know the meaning of words
You are indeed a MORON.
The whole nation that takes English as lingua franca, native or official language, does so because of their influences with England.
How can the English adopt their own language?
The US, Canada, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, etc, adopted the English language.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84895 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you consider factual truth and insult?
Where is the insult in telling the truth?
Let me check back at my post, no, no insult there, nothing but factual truth.
1 people are not born with a belief in god – FACT
2 any belief an anything (including the god or gods of your choice) is learned - FACT
3 E=MC^2 shows than no omnipotent entity can exist in this universe – FACT – I suggest you look up the meaning of the word omnipotent and consider the implication, I also suggest you think about it with your eyes closed.
4 You have already proved you don’t understand evolution and from what I can gather from your posts you are afraid of the very idea – FACT
No insults, just truth (without a capital T)
Truth is constant, whether using the upper or lower casing, it is fixed( constant).
You can not bend it, twist it, or change it, because it is absolute or definite.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#84896 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Wrong!
Archaeology has the answer.
From archaeological findings among world's religion, Judaism and Christianity stands out.
Others have/ has/ had little or no archaeological backings to back up their projections( stories).
Oh, bollocks.

Chuck, there is archæological evidence of Rome.

Egypt.

Greece.

I can trace my family back about 2,000 years.

NONE OF THAT MAKES YOUR DEITY REAL!!!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84897 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed the capital T – surely you meant ‘T’ruth
Why do I know this, because FS made a faith based comment, not a factual and truthful (lower case t) comment
" Truth ", or " truth ", stands for the same purpose, because words are constant.
No matter the space of time, the " Truth", or " truth " , must be revealed( come to pass).

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84898 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
That is not proof, that is the supposition of faith
Then you don't understand what " proof or evidence ", is all about.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84899 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
E=MC^2
Shows that no god as described in KJV Revelation 19:6 can exist in this universe
The guys name was Einstein, as to whether he was atheist or not is a tricky question, he referred to himself as agnostic and he certainly did not believe in the god of the babble or any other singular entity.
You are welcome to believe his equation or not, however whether you do believe it or not does not stop you exploiting the consequences of that equation.
Using Mathematical Equations to disprove the existence of God, makes you looks stupid.
Many have done that, but to no avail.
No one can rule out the existence of the Almighty.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84900 Apr 5, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>Sometime I wonder what century these fundies live in.
My thinking is founded on an eternal concept.

So what century would you classify me in?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84901 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no archeology proves the god part of the bible, in fact archeology disproves it more that proves it. perhaps you are confusing finding cities mentioned in the bible with proof of some god? it is not...
Like i said, Christianity/ Judaism has the most outstounding archaeological evidences than any other religions.
God is infinite, denying his existence is ignorance in the highest order.
Why death?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 14 min Endofdays 69,983
Are Asians/whites more evolved? (Sep '07) 37 min CBU 1,767
News Evolution 'not established truth' (May '08) 1 hr Yidfellas v USA 9,178
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr Subduction Zone 30,113
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 6 hr ChromiuMan 161,438
Is Creationism and Intelligent Design debunked ... 12 hr Subduction Zone 95
G-d versus Evolution? 13 hr 15th Dalai Lama 12
More from around the web