Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 222780 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84875 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are dishonest, hope you know that?
So, all the writers of Jesus, that wrote about Christ were all drunk?
Hmmm, impossible!
they didn't write about him during his life. they didn't even copy down what he said. if they really thought he was god or the saviour or even able to perform the miracles they said they saw, they would have copied down everything he said. they would have kept his used tissues and socks....

they did not do that, they didn't even write about him at all until long after he was dead and they could inflate, exaggerate, and use his story for their political gain.

jesus was a media sounbyte...
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84876 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you find all the absolute truths I speak amusing when it destroys and exoses your biased, prejudice, and flawed explanations on life and how nature works.
TOO BAD YOU CAN’T CONTROL NATURE AND IT’S WAYS WITH YOUR PSEUDO-SCIENTIFIC THINKING!
I find it quiet amusing my-self when people like you chooses to be inferior complexes!
HAAHAHAHAH!! Thanks for starting my day off with a laugh!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84877 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
The only thing that's in existence today is his dead body.
And even that's debatable.
No controversies, it is atheist and sceptics that just want to make things up.
According to History and research, Jesus actually lived.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84878 Apr 5, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
According to you the opposite of synonym is also "fish", "did", "bread", "nervously" and "according".
Or have you now decided to use the word properly? Which would of course contradict your earlier usages of the word causing you to violate your "law" of non-contradiction.
<quoted text>
Nature might not contradict itself but nature contradicts the law of gravity. Mercury violates this law, which is why it was replaced by the theory (not law) of relativity.
First “the dude” your foundation to understanding (your logical view on life) as an agnostic must change because it states “GOD cannot be proved or disproved” and GOD is an absolute truth found by only accepting absolute truths. This is an enduring process you must choose on your own.

Concluding that one absolute truth (GOD) cannot be found as an agnostic will have an effect on your thinking because now you will reject all absolutes and this is what GOD is.

Since you cannot scientifically conclude using the law of non-contradiction (absolute truth) because your agnostic view of GOD cannot be proven or disproven is a contradictory statement and violates the-law of non-contradiction. YOU CAN CHOOSE OPPOSING ANSWERS AND CALL IT THE TRUTH!

Remember my friend, when you conclude on an answer about reality (absolute truth) you must choose either or.

Your scientific conclusion using the logic of “the law of non-contradiction”(absolute truth) ONLY allows you to conclude:

A. GOD IS PROVABLE
B. OR NOT PROVABLE

It cannot be both answers (agnostic view) so choose wisely my friend because you have to make the choice on you own, I only opened the gateway for you to discovering absolute truths which lead to knowing who GOD is.

“There is no such thing”

Level 3

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#84879 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not subjective if you apply a non-flawed logical concept to it in accordance on how the laws of nature work. Morality can be in harmony with nature.
You see it subjective because your logical approach may be flawed.
Mortality if looked at in a non-flawed logical concept a scientific moral law can be established that has nothing to do with religions and pseudo-sciences because nature governs morality (human behavior).
What kind of logical approach or you using and applying to mortality!
That makes no sense. Morality varies from person to person and society to society. Nature governs morality? WTH?

“There is no such thing”

Level 3

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#84880 Apr 5, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a supreme being in understanding and in physical reality and I can prove it simply as an absolute truth. You’re not going to agree because you are not a person who understanding is not founded on absolute truth because you are an agnostic. Your concept is a logical flaw and so will your understanding of knowledge will be as well.
There are no absolutes.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84881 Apr 5, 2013
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus himself said "let him with out sin cast the first stone".
"Jesus himself he would not change one whit of the "Law"
A few years in Bible study and you'll get this stuff all figured out. So far you appear not to be a total waste of air.
M&M
It was through a few years of bible study that I figured out that religion is nothing more than a way to control minds and wallets.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#84882 Apr 5, 2013
Elohim wrote:
<quoted text>HAAHAHAHAH!! Thanks for starting my day off with a laugh!
it's always nice to have a psychotic break in the morning...

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#84883 Apr 5, 2013
CORRECTION to the dude on my last quote to you.

YOU CAN'T CHOOSE OPPOSING ANSWERS AND CALL IT THE TRUTH!

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84884 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> And i am also telling you that, all languages developed from one or more languages.
The French you are ranting about, had/ has alot of roots from Latin.
So, if French is unique to France, England is not an exception.
Yes, that’s what I said. Funny how you try obfuscating your lies and confusion with fact when it starts getting to hot for you

There is no ranting in my post there is FACT, you may consider it ranting because it blows your conception of English right out of the water but who cares about your idiotic ideas?

Jeesus fooking christ on a crutch. You still have not looked up the meaning of unique. You still use it to misrepresent you stupid ideas, you are looking sillier by the post. I even poste an alternative word that you could use,“developed” but you seem to have ignored that.

Here let me make it easy for you

UNIQUE – Adj - Being the only one of its kind; unlike anything else

Now I have shown you that English is in some respect like French, German, Dutch, Danish, Latin and Greek there are also a few other influences there –

i.e;. NOT UNIQUE

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#84885 Apr 5, 2013
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>There are no absolutes.
Are you sure?

;-)

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84886 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Lastly, all world languages had/ has one or more roots or influences from one another.
English is NOT the only language with that issue, others are.
Stop your rantings and face reality, English originated in England.
Yes I have been trying to explain that very concept to you for 5 months – good that it has eventually got through your thick skull. Now you don’t have very far to go to get this part of you life sorted out. Just look up (and at least try to understand) the meaning of “unique”

No English did not ORIGINATE in England, it developed in England, it originated from several different languages

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84887 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Why do we have several subjects and topics in a course?
A good thinker knows the right answer(s) to give.
You are clueless.
Sorry if my answers confuse your tiny mind

You asked a question, I gave you an answer that was factual. You changes your question. You were told how stupid you were being so you changed your question again

Do you really think that everyone is a stupid as you?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84888 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Now answer the question, posted to you.
If you don't, the handwriting is already clear, English originated in England ( no arguments about that, except any one wanted to).
I answered the question

You had no counter for the answer so changed the question

I told you that you were ignorant in moving the goalposts

So you changed your question again

You were shown that each of you questions (and you word selection) was pathetic and irrelevant

SO WHICH FOOKING QUESTION DO YOU WANT ANSWERING?

“When you treat people as they ”

Level 6

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#84889 Apr 5, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you sure?
;-)
Absolutely

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#84890 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are dishonest, hope you know that?
So, all the writers of Jesus, that wrote about Christ were all drunk?
Hmmm, impossible!
Pay attention.

There are absolutely NO contemporary accounts of your Nazarene.

None.

Zip.

Nada.

Zilch.

The alleged tales of Josephus and Tacitus are proven forgeries, written centuries later.

QUIT QUOTING THEM!! THEY DON'T FRIGGING COUNT!!!

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84891 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
The first part of your comment is what I have been replying to your stupid rants for the last 5 months, glad that you are capable of actual learning, even if it does take a long, long time.
As for your claim of “origin” I see you still have not yet looked up the meaning of the word and we know how stupid you are but that is no excuse for your ignorance when you have previously been told how and where to educate yourself. While you are at it you could look up the meaning of the word “developed” and consider the word in place of your totally incorrect usage of “origin”. You could also try reading a couple of the links I have provided on the origin of the English language. A little self education would do you no harm whatsoever, in fact it may actually benefit you and stop you looking as stupid.
BTW, you do not use your eyes to think, you use your brain and I, like many other people do there best thinking with their eyes closed, it cuts out distractions and often means you can consider deeper meanings and be more analytical. However if you can only think with your eyes open then it does explain why you are so stupid.
From your premise, there is nothing like origin but development.
You are fouled for ignorance.
Both words goes together, all languages are one way or the other, connected together.
But where it originated and developed, remain intact.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84892 Apr 5, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> You are dishonest, hope you know that?
So, all the writers of Jesus, that wrote about Christ were all drunk?
Hmmm, impossible!
Or high. Or insane. Or power hungry with a little knowledge of how to control the weak minded.
Elohim

Branford, CT

#84893 Apr 5, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it's always nice to have a psychotic break in the morning...
Sometime I wonder what century these fundies live in.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#84894 Apr 5, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Adoption???= Acceptance – NOT origin
So you are now saying that English was not the “original” English language but was adopted (accepted) by the English
I really do with you could make up your mind what you actually do mean
Listen to moron, I may be dyslexic but that does not mean I don’t know the meaning of words
You are indeed a MORON.
The whole nation that takes English as lingua franca, native or official language, does so because of their influences with England.
How can the English adopt their own language?
The US, Canada, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, etc, adopted the English language.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 20 min Eagle 12 - 80,059
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 24 min Eagle 12 - 32,587
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 3 hr ChromiuMan 163,795
News Intelligent design (Jul '15) Sat Dogen 571
What's your religion? Fri Zog Has-fallen 4
Life started in Tennessee proof. Sep 15 Science4life 1
Science News (Sep '13) Sep 8 Ricky F 4,001
More from around the web