Abio is hypothesis only and under research. The theory of evolutio does not rely on abio.You may want to read Denton and AE Wilder-Smith to bring you up to speed on your question. High schooler's are shown blobs and lighting striking a pond of chemicals, that was supposedly to have kick started all of this mindless complexity.
Actually ID is anti-critical thinking, hence brainwashing. It offers nothing but anti-evolution arguments and sets itself up as the default option if evolution was wrong - which it merely assumes for theological reasons (but avoids explaining how the limits of the designer were ascertained). It offers nothing in the way of positive evidence.Backed by the media, Nat'l Geo, Sagan etc. and ID being mocked at every level they have no chance to think reasonably, they have been brainwashed.
Your baseless opinion is irrelevant. You have zero evidence.In my view only a higher intelligence acting on chemicals offers a reasonable solution to the origin and complexity of life.
But lying is and that's what you do. If your opposing viewpoint had merit you'd submit it to scientific peer-review. As it is you've only got one out of two papers to support you. The first was retracted due to it violating peer-review and the second because the peers were sloppy that day.I have friends that have views different than mine, do I think of them as foolish?, no. They have as much to offer in society and their families as any of us on my side. Opposing viewpoints are healthy for us all, it makes us think, research and challenge our thinking. That's not wrong.
One of these days your anecdotes will be about meeting Elvis. But it still won't be relevant.I know a Russian that I saw every weekend all winter for years,
Because humans figured out that abstract concepts were handy for manipulating people. Hence creationism.I would say to him "(name), look, you always want to talk about religion and politics with me, we have to see each other weekly, I like you and can deal with it, are you good with this?", he would say sure. He had a lot of jokes about sex, one day I said to him "(blank),do you realize that if women had the same intense sex drive functions as men there would be no such thing as marriage, couples would be running off anywhere @ anytime and marriage would be pointless??" This got him thinking, how did sex evolve into to that only in humans?
That's a VERY good point. By any chance have you seen Ray Comfort's video on the banana?We are different than animals. He was eating an orange one day and I said, "look at that thing, the color and how each slice is a perfect bite".
Charming tale.(yawn) I know of plenty of others who also believe in God but don't necessarily have to deny all of science for the sake of their religious beliefs. Also highly educated scientists. But people's religious opinions have no bearing on the validity of scientific concepts. You let yours cloud your judgement. That's not our problem.Later he became a believer in God. His wife is Jewish, both are highly educated professors. They had two boys and always wanted a girl. After that they soon had a girl, the happiest couple I know.