Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 223360 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82198 Mar 22, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
And what blasphemy was that?
<quoted text>
That it's so very easy to wind you up.
Great sense of humor, huh? Pffft
Wind me up? Was that your goal? You have set such a low bar for yourself.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#82199 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong, God created light, before the earth. It never said that the light was generated by the sun. Ever heard of artificial light? OOOH, that was a discovery of science. Gee and God already knew how to do it. mmmmm
Yes.

And when it rains, it's because the angels are crying.

That's how your logic is presented.

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Statesville, NC

#82200 Mar 22, 2013
Alien Outlaw wrote:
<quoted text>Hello.......woodtick.. ..knock, knock....is it working? "Birth of the universe".... Not God(learned human behavior) or Big Bang(human theory) terms....In terms not known to the human species. Humans don't like not knowing...so throwout so idea that sounds good based on human logic.....Wait, that's how religion was formed.
Yeah...when you say things lke "human theory" you get luaghd at...exactly WHAT isn't a human theory? we are cvurrently the only speciesa capable of formulating cogent, rational, TESTABLE experiments and explanations for things...what the hell is your rationale? You sound woefully undereducated in the subject matter.
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82201 Mar 22, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes.
And when it rains, it's because the angels are crying.
That's how your logic is presented.
Is that in your biblical quotes playbook, it's not in mine.

Level 1

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#82202 Mar 22, 2013
No matter what side you take, we are all just star dust my friends.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#82203 Mar 22, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you, a known and rampant liar accusing me of lighting because the facts I am specifying donít mesh with your wet dreams of magic?
We know you are good at accusing people of all sorts on heinous behaviour (including child murder) when it suits you, that of course does not make it true it just means that you have a sad personality defect
Oh!
Do you have a sad personality defect?

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#82204 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wind me up? Was that your goal? You have set such a low bar for yourself.
No, it wasn't my goal. Like evolution, I had no goal. I simply made a little joke about your reference to artificial light. If you weren't not so damn miserable, you might have simply snickered and moved on. But, no! You have to make a big friggin deal about it.

Great sense of humor, my ass.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#82205 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
As God has performed over and over again. You don't seem to realize, God is the ULTIMATE scientist and researcher, you are just ONE of many experiments he has performed.
Which god? humans have invented literally thousands of them...

no evidence yet that any of those gods did what you say or even existed? why not?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#82206 Mar 22, 2013
smokin but not a bum wrote:
No matter what side you take, we are all just star dust my friends.
that is a fact...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#82207 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, so I gathered. You and woody are two peas in a pod, you parrot the exact same mantra over and over again and feed off of it. The ignorance lies with you Terry, for you refuse to accept that there is something WAY beyond you and your little time and space.
why would anyone accept somehting that has no proof of existing?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#82208 Mar 22, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
Orbit closures daily between 2:00 am and 6:00 am.
Crap..and i have a 6:30 conference in the andromeda system....
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82209 Mar 22, 2013
GatorBUILT wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah...when you say things lke "human theory" you get luaghd at...exactly WHAT isn't a human theory? we are cvurrently the only speciesa capable of formulating cogent, rational, TESTABLE experiments and explanations for things...what the hell is your rationale? You sound woefully undereducated in the subject matter.
"exactly WHAT isn't a human theory?" Exactly, and since humans ARE fallible, what makes you think any of the experiments and explanations are "accurate"? "Explanations" is an interesting word for you to apply as well. It indicates that something has taken place, but not engineered by US. Those alleged "explanations" for how the earth was created through a scientific approach are indeed nothing more than "theories" engineered by the fallible creature, MAN. Yet they are embraced as the truth, how is this accurate? So called "testable experiments" are only tested by the human knowledge, a limited source, so how can they be accurate. We would need an "outside" variable to REALLY get an honest result.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#82210 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
And you have a problem with what part? What makes you think that the stars had any relevance over the earth and shouldn't follow in the manner that they did in creation? Who are you to decide the order of things? Egotistical much?
We know for a fact that bazillions of stars were there before the Earth wa formed.

your cult lied to you...again...
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82211 Mar 22, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it wasn't my goal. Like evolution, I had no goal. I simply made a little joke about your reference to artificial light. If you weren't not so damn miserable, you might have simply snickered and moved on. But, no! You have to make a big friggin deal about it.
Great sense of humor, my ass.
Wound you up, didn't I, snicker snicker.........

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#82212 Mar 22, 2013
GatorBUILT wrote:
<quoted text>
Newton was a deist and has been DEAD FOR NEARLY 300 YEARS...wasn't a trinitarian...and chased the Philosophers Stone for decades...when YOU fools start quoting Newton's Principia Mathematica instead of KJ Bible verses, you'll THEN understand why Newton is known as a SCIENTIST, and not a religionist...and for the record again: a CATHOLIOC priest named Georges LEmaitre proposed the original Big Bang theory, which Einstein scoffed at, as did Hoyle...onlt for BOTH to have to admit they were wrong, and Lemaitre was right.
Newton was a firm believer of God unlike you atheist.
Name calling will never change the fact at hand.
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82213 Mar 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Which god? humans have invented literally thousands of them...
no evidence yet that any of those gods did what you say or even existed? why not?
Thousands? Really? WOW!
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82214 Mar 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>why would anyone accept somehting that has no proof of existing?
When this world ceases to exist as we know, human extinction, I wonder if ET's will wonder if we ever existed at all. No concrete evidence to claim otherwise, huh?
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#82215 Mar 22, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>We know for a fact that bazillions of stars were there before the Earth wa formed.
your cult lied to you...again...
A "fact" based on what? A money fat bunch of astronomers who "know" can't even track a meteorite that hit in Russia, those all knowledgeable ones? LOL! Or do they know which space rock is going to 86 us into oblivion and just not sharing?

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#82216 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Wound you up, didn't I, snicker snicker.........
Hardly.

And you never specified what my blasphemy was.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#82217 Mar 22, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
A "fact" based on what? A money fat bunch of astronomers who "know" can't even track a meteorite that hit in Russia, those all knowledgeable ones? LOL! Or do they know which space rock is going to 86 us into oblivion and just not sharing?
Sheesh! What the hell is your problem, lady? You act as if trying to figure out how things happened and how things work is some sort of mortal sin. We KNOW we don't know everything. THAT is the motivation. To understand. Why do you find that distasteful?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 2 min Fossil Man 166,301
Are Asians/whites more evolved? (Sep '07) 3 hr knows 1,824
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr Simon 87,208
What's your religion? 14 hr Endofdays 767
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 22 hr superwilly 5,811
Scientific Method Feb 15 stinky 20
Evolving A Maze Solving Robot Feb 6 Untangler 2
More from around the web