Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 220673 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

FREE SERVANT
#79342 Mar 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it's also brought up by backhoes and excavators...
what is your point? the fact that we have oceans is in no way AT ALL any proof of the mythical flood that every single branch of science involved has proved did not occur.
your bible lied to you...many times...
The people who tell you those are proven are the ones who are wrong. The flood happened and the fountains of the great deep being broken up is a clue to understanding this.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#79343 Mar 7, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Merely a hypothesis. Proof, not conjecture, please.
Which one was a hypothesis? you covered every article linked?

“Trippin' the Riff...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79344 Mar 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>it's also brought up by backhoes and excavators...
what is your point? the fact that we have oceans is in no way AT ALL any proof of the mythical flood that every single branch of science involved has proved did not occur.
your bible lied to you...many times...
so the earth covered with water by no ways implies a flood...right.lol
CBOW

Abbottstown, PA

#79345 Mar 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>not at all, i am quite polite to myself and anyone that is polite to me.
best way to get spit at, have objects thrown at ehm, or get damned to hell...talk to someone like you....
Really? I suppose "politeness" is in the eye of the beholder. Keep "beholding" yourself, it's all YOU can rely on.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79347 Mar 7, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
Early Earth 'was covered in water'
http://www.earthdive.com/site/news/newsdetail...
No one has denied that. But that was 2.5 billion years ago.

The Noachian flood supposedly happened in the last 10,000 years.

We know that did not happen. That claim is denied by the simple fact that ice floats.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79348 Mar 7, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is this not a BIG story?
I'm often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially true when it comes to our ancient human history.
I won't hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It's real. I'll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious implications.
How it was discovered
In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.
Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.
Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded: "I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo."
http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html
LOL!!

Do you know how many times that they have "found Noah's Ark"?

Please. Get real. Once again, does ice float in your world? It does in mine.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#79349 Mar 7, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
so the earth covered with water by no ways implies a flood...right.lol
Not in the time of humans, no. we have world wide evidence of a 6-7 mile wide rock that hit the Earth 65 million years ago. humans have been here maybe 500,000 yrs.

not one shred of evidence of a world wide flood in that time.

your cult lied to you...again...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#79350 Mar 7, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? I suppose "politeness" is in the eye of the beholder. Keep "beholding" yourself, it's all YOU can rely on.
Ok there politeness boy...care to go over trhe wonderful things your spit at me on other threads? sheesh! talk about vile...

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#79351 Mar 7, 2013
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
so the earth covered with water by no ways implies a flood...right.lol
Water covering the Earth 2.5 billion years ago is not evidence of a Noah's Ark type flood. If you reject the claim that this occurred 2.5 billion years ago then you have to reject the claim that the Earth was covered with water using that evidence.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#79352 Mar 7, 2013
CBOW wrote:
<quoted text>
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>70% of the earths surface is still covered with the evidence of upwelling salty water.
upwelling from where? from wooddick57. Your problem is that you are posting to too many threads, you can't even follow your own questions anymore. You need a job to keep you occupied.
it is not upwelling from anywhere.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#79353 Mar 7, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is this not a BIG story?
I'm often amazed at our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially true when it comes to our ancient human history.
I won't hold you in suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It's real. I'll describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious implications.
How it was discovered
In 1959, Turkish army captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field, stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near the Turkish border with Iran.
Capt. Durupinar was familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio State University.
Brandenburger was responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded: "I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career, I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo."
http://www.viewzone.com/noahx.html
yet when people went to find this 'ark' it was just a rock...

reality is fun!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#79354 Mar 7, 2013
Bind the strongman
bronck burger

Bayonne, NJ

#79355 Mar 7, 2013
HEY FOLKS you all know that WE HUMAN'S came from the CABBAGE PLANT.
FREE SERVANT
#79356 Mar 7, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point, thousands of years ago the great pyramid was built and no one has come up with a decent idea of how they did it.A mechainical engineer did a study for Graham Hancock in the 1980's about whether the United states could build the great pyramid of Giza today. It was doubtful, all the rock quarries in the U.S. would have to triple production , and run around the clock for 20 years just to make and get ready the one million stones each over a ton that were required.This using modern machinery , logistics, roads and methods. That slaves with ropes, logs and copper tools did it is stupid.If ancient peoples could accomplish that then an ark would have been pretty simple.
Thank you for the reply. Have you heard of the theory that morter could have been formed in place to build the pyamids?

“Trippin' the Riff...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79357 Mar 7, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Water covering the Earth 2.5 billion years ago is not evidence of a Noah's Ark type flood. If you reject the claim that this occurred 2.5 billion years ago then you have to reject the claim that the Earth was covered with water using that evidence.
where is your proof that this occurred 2.5 billions tears ago?

“Trippin' the Riff...”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#79358 Mar 7, 2013
ah...tears of heaven...years for tears.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#79359 Mar 7, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a list of a few places that have their own version of a WORLD WIDE FLOOD:
Europe
Greek, Arcadian, Samothrace
Roman
Scandinavian, German
Celtic, Welsh
Lithuanian, Transylvanian Gypsy
Turkey
Near East
Sumerian
Egypt, Babylonian, Assyrian, Chaldean, Hebrew, Islamic
Persian, Zoroastrian
Africa
Cameroon
Masai (East Africa), Komililo Nandi, Kwaya (Lake Victoria)
Southwest Tanzania, Pygmy, Ababua (northern Zaire), Kikuyu (Kenya), Bakongo (west Zaire), Bachokwe?(southern Zaire), Lower Congo, Basonge, Bena-Lulua (Congo River, southeast Zaire)
Yoruba (southwest Nigeria), Efik-Ibibio (Nigeria), Ekoi (Nigeria)
Mandingo (Ivory Coast)
Asia
Vogul
Samoyed (north Siberia)
Yenisey-Ostyak (north central Siberia), Kamchadale (northeast Siberia)
Altaic (central Asia), Tuvinian (Soyot)(north of Mongolia)
Mongolia, Buryat (eastern Siberia)
Sagaiye (eastern Siberia)
Russian
Hindu, Bhil (central India), Kamar (Raipur District, Central India), Assam
Tamil (southern India)
Lepcha (Sikkim), Tibet, Singpho (Assam), Lushai (Assam), Lisu (northwest Yunnan, China), Lolo (southwestern China), Jino (southern Yunnan, China), Karen (Burma), Chingpaw (Upper Burma)
China
Korea
Munda (north-central India), Santal (Bengal), Ho (southwestern Bengal)
Bahnar (Cochin China), Kammu (northern Thailand)
Andaman Islands (Bay of Bengal)
And here's a list of just one place which didn't:

Planet Earth.
KJV

United States

#79361 Mar 7, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>LOL!!

Do you know how many times that they have "found Noah's Ark"?

Please. Get real. Once again, does ice float in your world? It does in mine.
Keep that in mind because where you headed there will be no such thing as ice.
KJV

United States

#79362 Mar 7, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yet when people went to find this 'ark' it was just a rock...

reality is fun!
The petrified forest is just rocks also.
KJV

United States

#79364 Mar 7, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Thank you for the reply. Have you heard of the theory that morter could have been formed in place to build the pyamids?
It was a stone mountain. They just caved the pyramids out of it. That's why there is all that sand.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 16 min 15th Dalai Lama 160,312
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 48 min Regolith Based Li... 28,321
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr Dogen 61,382
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 13 hr Dogen 2,687
Curious dilemma about DNA 19 hr Subduction Zone 2
News Book aims to prove existence of God (Nov '09) Mar 23 Regolith Based Li... 99
News Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) Mar 16 Dogen 180,394
More from around the web