Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 209984 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

FREE SERVANT
#76593 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yes.
Do you understand the point I am trying to get at?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76594 Feb 19, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
How is higgs-boson different from prime matter?
here's a 3 min explanation of prime matter that make up the element hydrogen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =eXRSHkO05bkXX
So i did not ignore you but set to work to find something that wouldmake it easy to understand.
So it is about combining electro-magnetic force-photons and electro-weak-force looks like photons BUT have mass.

The results from unifying where later called W and Z particles.
And (video) the field slowing them down so they could even collide T0 + 400,000 would be the higgsfield.
But something went before that.
So the celebrity would be the higgs-boson but causing a lasting effect.
Humanoid

Kansas City, MO

#76595 Feb 19, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
So you were raised by aliens?
Thats the right question Cybele. You are intelligent because unlike the others on topix you are curious even knowing the possibiliy of alien beings by human standards is impossible.......so was the moon landing. What event changed your life, your thought process?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#76596 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>Do you understand the point I am trying to get at?
i know the point you think you are getting at, but there is no logical reason to make that leap. none at all.

as i pre-emptively told you, the fact that there are cycles in nature only proves that there are cycles in nature...

slam.
FREE SERVANT
#76597 Feb 19, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
BFD
This is a simple but profound truth.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76598 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>no, i gave completely true info, and I understand the concept fine, just asking you if anyone has ever detected this mysterious matter, which you can't seem to answer.
As we spoke about some pages back. even i forgot the name (it's not used that often, but then i used) but the simplest hydrogen atom is meant.
The video however suggests different. I saw the one on the volcanic moon first too. Just to get some idea as to who that Adam fellow was.
There where several others to choose from. The one with the pic. of the shooting jet from a spherical shape f.i.
FREE SERVANT
#76599 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>i know the point you think you are getting at, but there is no logical reason to make that leap. none at all.
as i pre-emptively told you, the fact that there are cycles in nature only proves that there are cycles in nature...
slam.
There are ordered cycles in nature and they are patterned to repeat to convey something.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#76600 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>This is a simple but profound truth.
That musicians use chord progression? True. That this relates to anything beyond music? Nope.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Seffner, FL

#76601 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>There are ordered cycles in nature and they are patterned to repeat to convey something.
You mean like C, F & G?

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76602 Feb 19, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
So i did not ignore you but set to work to find something that wouldmake it easy to understand.
So it is about combining electro-magnetic force-photons and electro-weak-force looks like photons BUT have mass.
The results from unifying where later called W and Z particles.
And (video) the field slowing them down so they could even collide T0 + 400,000 would be the higgsfield.
But something went before that.
So the celebrity would be the higgs-boson but causing a lasting effect.
Ah well that is the media-angle and how they got to god-particle. HOWEVER
Or occur simultaniously or be the artefact.
Usually an interrelatedness is suggested, not so much a cause. For supersymmetry would try the couple such bosons to a virtual particle, it's twinshadow so to say.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#76603 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>There are ordered cycles in nature and they are patterned to repeat to convey something.
there is no logical reason to make that leap of thought. none at all.

again, the fact that there are patterns and cycles in nature only proves that there are patterns and cycles in nature. nothing more.

you may beoive what you wish, but that means nothing.
FREE SERVANT
#76604 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>there is no logical reason to make that leap of thought. none at all.
again, the fact that there are patterns and cycles in nature only proves that there are patterns and cycles in nature. nothing more.
you may beoive what you wish, but that means nothing.
There are patterned cycles in nature and why would you think this is so?
FREE SERVANT
#76605 Feb 19, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like C, F & G?
Yeah, in threes usually.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76606 Feb 19, 2013
MikeF wrote:
Speaking of that goddamn particle:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/18/us-...
Maybe the guy get's nervous being interviewed. He afterall stated that ATLAS had but detected a mere imposter.
Stuff happens anywhere between 125 GeV and anywhere on TeV scale.
And we've got pancaked...flat...nice that something will jump out.
But why?
https://docs.google.com/viewer...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#76607 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>There are patterned cycles in nature and why would you think this is so?
Because things work well in cycles.

Randomness would be a poor way to run a universe.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76608 Feb 19, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
No they have not created one yet. Right now CERN is not even at work. It's under maintenance.
The information and confirmation i had also included inthe long post, but here it is 4 juli 2012 confirmed 12 december 2012.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/TAM...

The only one i'm still looking for is the hole in the CMBR
FREE SERVANT
#76609 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>Because things work well in cycles.
Randomness would be a poor way to run a universe.
You said it!

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#76610 Feb 19, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>No, i clearly repeated what the scientists at Cern are saying? what part of that do you not understand? if you cannot understand those simple sentences, why do you think you can understand physics?(or were you purposefully attempting to attribute to me things I did not say?)
Well intellectual honesty would demand stating that they did claim it uptp 7sigma and that Lykken for ever is firmly convinced that they have not found the real thing.
But why a higgs-boson at 126 GeV would spook him into stating H-B's spitting creation all around when we are long gone, is beyond me.
Scalars seem to be his thing.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#76611 Feb 19, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Well intellectual honesty would demand stating that they did claim it uptp 7sigma and that Lykken for ever is firmly convinced that they have not found the real thing.
But why a higgs-boson at 126 GeV would spook him into stating H-B's spitting creation all around when we are long gone, is beyond me.
Scalars seem to be his thing.
yes, i understand that not all the people involved think they have found it. perhaps we have not. at least we have evidence to suggest it should exist, unlike this mysterious prime matter...

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#76612 Feb 19, 2013
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>You said it!
that in no way suggests any intelligent design of the universe. just that nature tends to work efficiently.

again, all you have proved is that there exist cycles and patterns in nature, nothing more.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 10 min It aint necessari... 152,260
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 10 min Bob of Quantum-Faith 20,298
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 21 hr ChristineM 45,559
America evolving into lockdown on purpose Sep 25 Dogen 68
New law to further hatred towards police Sep 24 One way or another 4
Hillary, a taco stand on every corner Sep 24 One way or another 4
News A better theory of intelligent design Sep 23 Chazofsaints 21
More from around the web