Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#75854 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I don't take shit for an answer. The universe can not just evolve with out a maker.
So you say.

All available evidence clearly indicates otherwise.

Do you still think that your ignorance of science proves your deity?

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Level 7

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#75855 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> If you can not answer that question, on how the universe came into form, then you can not disprove the existence of God.
Who's trying to "disprove" the existence of your deity?

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#75856 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I don't take shit for an answer. The universe can not just evolve with out a maker.
Umm... not according to your posts. Shit (that is, anything that agrees with your stance) is all you will accept as an answer. You are the lowest form of religionist... one that will steadfastly reject verifiable reality in order maintain your obviously frail grip on your religion.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#75857 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Get back to me when you have evidence of the magic goo.
Logical fail by bohart. It is up to him to find evidence for his invisible friend. Logic all but demands that without evidence that we do not believe in his nonsense.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75858 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Globally, atheism are on the minority, true or false?
Just accept your blindness and ignorance, Buffoon.
so when you christians invented your religion and were the vast minority, you must have been really, really wrong, huh?

your logic skills would be embarrassing if you were a third grader. for an adult they are shameful

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#75859 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
No it's just a great line by Milton to describe how the created has the nerve to tell the creator how to do the job.
You are begging the question. Where is your evidence for your creator. Milton was a writer and not a scientist. He has no authority of any sort to make such a proclamation.

Without evidence you lose.
bohart

Newport, TN

#75860 Feb 14, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
And let's try something here, Boo boo.
Observation that life is made up of chemistry? Observable fact.
Observation that new life develops from naturally occurring chemical processes? Observable fact.
Observation of life? Observable fact.
Observation of evolution? Observable fact.
Observation of magical poofing of organisms by invisible Jewish wizards? SWEET F A.
Hypothesis - magical poofing of life due to the intervention of an interdimensional invisible Jewish wizard. Scientific observations to support this include... well, uh... SWEET F A. Currently undergoing scientific research by... absolutely positively NO-ONE on the entire frakking planet.
Hypothesis - Abiogenesis is the result of God making use of naturally occurring chemical processes from the abundance of chemicals present in the Earths early environment. Observations to support this include planet-wide chemistry as well as the earliest forms of organisms being bacterial/micriobial in nature, the reproduction of which gradually led to a great variety of lifeforms with no violations of nested hierarchy. However unfortunately there is no testable evidence of (a) God. Currently being researched by numerous scientific organizations across the world, except for the bit about God since it is not currently scientifically verifiable. The rest is though.
Now, note that these are two DISTINCTLY THEIST points of view regarding the origin of life on this planet.
Also note that only ONE of these positions does not necessarily require a denial of reality.
Care to take a guess which one that would be?
Lets try something her Dud, as your fellow puddle gooist Poly 257 has posted, " Without testable hypotheses and repeatable results , all you have is personal opinion, not actual knowledge"....Now , Has life coming from goo passed the test, No, has it been repeated No, so all you have left is the Evangelical puddle gooist church of the faithful.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75861 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Get back to me when you have evidence of the magic goo.
here i am1 we know that all the parts of the goo ae common parts of the universe!

there you go. we know they had to be here on the primordial earth.

Goo with that!

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75862 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> If you can not answer that question, on how the universe came into form, then you can not disprove the existence of God.
i do not need to disprove something that no-one has ony proof of.

seems the total and utter lack of even the teensiest-weensiest shred of any kind of evidence at all is all th proof anyu one would need. and the proven lies your cult has told you about htis 'god". and the proven re-used myths in his story from previous proven myth cults.

anything else you need?

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75863 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I don't take shit for an answer. The universe can not just evolve with out a maker.
you have proof of that? no you don't. another proven lie from Chip...sad...very sad. your mother must be hanging her head in shame...
bohart

Newport, TN

#75864 Feb 14, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>here i am1 we know that all the parts of the goo ae common parts of the universe!
there you go. we know they had to be here on the primordial earth.
Goo with that!
I have all the parts for a chocolate cake in the kitchen, how long will it take for it to self assemble?
bohart

Newport, TN

#75865 Feb 14, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Logical fail by bohart. It is up to him to find evidence for his invisible friend. Logic all but demands that without evidence that we do not believe in his nonsense.
Thats not an answer, just a God attack, which is the basis of all for you, you simply try to cloak your hatred for God with some type of scientific jargon, and when that fails here comes the flood, invisible friend, skydaddy, flying spaghetti monster, etc, etc.
bohart

Newport, TN

#75866 Feb 14, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
You are begging the question. Where is your evidence for your creator. Milton was a writer and not a scientist. He has no authority of any sort to make such a proclamation.
Without evidence you lose.
Life is evidence of a creator, as is the incredible world and universe. Now if you can show that life can create itself , I'll reconsider,

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Iquique

#75867 Feb 14, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> I don't take shit for an answer. The universe can not just evolve with out a maker.
The maker cannot exist without a maker.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75868 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
I have all the parts for a chocolate cake in the kitchen, how long will it take for it to self assemble?
if you hve all the ingredients for cake, life is already here...

your not so good at that whole logic thing, huh? we knew that already..

care to try again?

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Iquique

#75869 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats not an answer, just a God attack, which is the basis of all for you, you simply try to cloak your hatred for God with some type of scientific jargon, and when that fails here comes the flood, invisible friend, skydaddy, flying spaghetti monster, etc, etc.
How can one hate something that does not exist? So far every thing on earth has been explainable by nature and science. The only real question left is the creation of the universe. We just don't know. It's possible that it's been here forever. I just can't imagine its all because of some deranged god who's been playing with us all these years.
bohart

Newport, TN

#75870 Feb 14, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>here i am1 we know that all the parts of the goo ae common parts of the universe!
there you go. we know they had to be here on the primordial earth.
Goo with that!
All the parts for the goo are common and in the universe eh ? how will they self assemble and come to life? If you attempt to give a scientific answer it must include a testable hypothesis with repeatable results, or it's just a belief.Take your time.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75871 Feb 14, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
The maker cannot exist without a maker.
Introducing new ULTRA-CREATOR!!!

Can't get rid of those pesky theological conundrums? Use ULTRA-CREATOR!!!

No buffing, no scrubbing, just wipe them away with one stroke of an epiphany.

ULTRA-CREATOR!!!Can be used with any standard bible, koran or talmud.(adapters available for those freaky asian cults...)

Order now and get three ULTRA-CREATORS for the price of one!(not available in Jerusalem or Mecca.)

operators always have been, and always will be standing by. Order now!
bohart

Newport, TN

#75872 Feb 14, 2013
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
How can one hate something that does not exist? So far every thing on earth has been explainable by nature and science. The only real question left is the creation of the universe. We just don't know. It's possible that it's been here forever. I just can't imagine its all because of some deranged god who's been playing with us all these years.
Deranged God?, thanks for proving my point, Ha,Ha,Ha.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#75873 Feb 14, 2013
bohart wrote:
<quoted text>
Life is evidence of a creator, as is the incredible world and universe. Now if you can show that life can create itself , I'll reconsider,
no, that is not evidence. you don't really know what that word means, do you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Darwin on the rocks 1 hr Chimney1 81
The Satanic Character of Social Darwinism 3 hr Chimney1 653
Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) 6 hr MikeF 174,428
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 19 hr DanFromSmithville 137,373
Why are there no dinosaur pen is fossil? Sep 27 David M 2
New Fossil Reveals Multicellular Life Evolved 6... Sep 26 TedHOhio 8
Birds Evolved From Dinosaurs Slowly—Then Took Off Sep 26 TedHOhio 2

Evolution Debate People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE