Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 197177 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72574 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Until you can prove you are what you claim you are we can proceed to have a real argument otherwise you are just fooling everyone here.
What claims have I made?

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72575 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>I use the same qualifications of evidence that scientific inquiry does. Meaning it can be tested and demonstrates reliable results. Just because you want there to be something beneath you, doesn't mean there actually is.
You are lacking in evidence. Don't be a hypocrite.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72576 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Buddha is not worshipped. He is a guide, not a deity.
Narrow!
Some Budhist sect even see him as a god.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72577 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>What claims have I made?
You keep telling me that I don't have evidence that you are what I think you are. Now you are just lying. You are an incorrigible liar. Please refrain from using arguments when you are just doing the same.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72578 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Not Microsoft?
:-/
Microsoft is man made, yes or no?
Even the founder knows that there is God.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#72579 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>What claims have I made?
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#72580 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Narrow!
Some Budhist sect even see him as a god.
Anybody who believes in Karma believes in the supernatural.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72581 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you asking for what has already been presented numerous times which you will reject anyway no matter how much evidence there is anyway?
In short, why are you so dishonest?
And to point out AGAIN for the monumentally stupid people with extreme memory problems, the theory of evolution makes NO theological claims. It does NOT say whether or not (a) God was involved. Hence why both atheists and Christians accept evolution.
You are the dishonest one here. No evidence to date, disproving God.
All christians worldwide will never agree with you that, God does not exist.
alan

Kansas City, MO

#72582 Jan 27, 2013
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> The bible is real due to the fact that, archaeology has confirmed most of its stories.
We are not talking about the koran but the bible.
Next?
Next? archaeology has confirmed? Humans have ways of making everything seem real.A few thousand years of props and story telling, rewriting, editing sure makes a story seem real. CI think, religion is a business. The Pope is living the high life. It all started with an advanced alien being with a sense of humor. He wanted to see how far the "Ascension" would go with the simple minded humans. Bingo! It turned into the "Bible". Add, pictures, stories of fantasy, fables of many and its history. Not real, just a story made real by its believers.Let us know when this God character becomes real.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72583 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
We understood the grammar. We don't understand illogical arguments.
Likewise.
No logical evidence from you or any one disproving the existence of a God.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72584 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
You're forgetting to take into account that Chuck in particular is not quite sane.
Likewise.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72585 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not ruled out. At all. Never has been. All you require is evidence. You don't have it.
Evidence?
To date, none of you have it.
I do not subscribe to guesses and projections.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72586 Jan 27, 2013
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>You are insane.
Ofcourse. We have so many of them here.

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72587 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. Particle/anti-particle pairs in a vacuum.
Keep in mind the hypocrisy of you using this argument. You demand everything "must" have a cause, except your proposal which has special exemption. I dispute that assertion.
Good!
Now tell me what brought about the particle?
Or simply, how did the particle came? What brought it?

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#72588 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.
He says he's asexual but rants on about gay rights and drools over Brian Cox, posting that he thinks Brian is "dreamy". I think we all know what KK means by dreamy, don't we?

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72589 Jan 27, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Cats have kittens therefore God exists?
Can't beat that.
I am using logic. If cats and other mammals can give birth or create their kind, they must definitely have a creator( the Genesis).

Level 2

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#72590 Jan 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you have provided no evidence, none contradicting your assertions is required. Your assertions are thereby dismissed as mythology.
Likewise.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72591 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep telling me that I don't have evidence that you are what I think you are. Now you are just lying. You are an incorrigible liar. Please refrain from using arguments when you are just doing the same.
No, I keep asking for evidence and none has been presented so I am rightfully assuming you have none.
phaines

Big Bear Lake, CA

#72592 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.
do you know what asexual means??
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Do_earthworms_repro...

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#72593 Jan 27, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
That you are asexual. No biology can prove humans are asexual.
Biologically there can be asexuals, and the trait is not isolated but is likely genetic. I made no assertions regarding how or why, but I am asexual. Meh, I fail to see how the why or how is important to a layperson such as yourself.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 min renee 30,895
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 4 min scientia potentia... 150,884
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 6 min Richardfs 13,107
Christianity and why its wrong + evolution debates May 21 Zog Has-fallen 15
Are Asians/whites more evolved? (Sep '07) May 17 Bkd 1,746
Clues to ancient giant asteroid found in Australia May 17 MIDutch 1
Endogenous retroviruses put common descent beyo... May 16 MIDutch 5
More from around the web