Evolution vs. Creation

[Givemehumbleanyd ay]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh sorry, was I addressing yes another sock of you? Well in that case I don’t give a wet fart for what type you are, and of course that explains the deliberate ignorance and stupidity I detected in your posts. Honey bitch, when you insult me then I insult you right back, rules of the game. You don’t like the rules of the game then go play with you little dollie;.
Uhhuh.'Nuff said.eh???

You're being convulted again...because I have no idea of what you're talking about, I never was one much for these "dollies" you project, so can only assume what one or might've offered as being a passing interest, pre-kindergarten age, that of which I outgrew MANY, MANY years ago, once they showed me microscopes!
You don't make the rules of the game...especially and obviously more specifically, in MY game-because I tend to be a rule "practicer" believing that a lot of times, such is GOOD for society, rather than denigrating to

So try this one:

You have to be Original, NOT parrot, squawked and clonedDUH...because that parrot, resquawrked and clonedUH kind of stuff is actually pretty weird...of obsessive stalkers realms, and stalker types tend to be a little freakish, with known psychological problems...and for the more normal, rule considering types of people, it's best to stay away from ones like that.

You can apologize anytime for calling me a childish name though, just don't even bother to address me as "honey" anything-especially disrespectfully...there's very few that I even acknowledge such familiarity from, and anything else, from anywhere else, I attribute to ignorance.

But dew yew have yerself a nice day.

[ChristineM]

Givemehumbleanyday wrote:

<quoted text>
You're being convulted again...because I have no idea of what you're talking about, I never was one much for these "dollies" you project, so can only assume what one or might've offered as being a passing interest, pre-kindergarten age, that of which I outgrew MANY, MANY years ago, once they showed me microscopes!
You don't make the rules of the game...especially and obviously more specifically, in MY game-because I tend to be a rule "practicer" believing that a lot of times, such is GOOD for society, rather than denigrating to
So try this one:
You have to be Original, NOT parrot, squawked and clonedDUH...because that parrot, resquawrked and clonedUH kind of stuff is actually pretty weird...of obsessive stalkers realms, and stalker types tend to be a little freakish, with known psychological problems...and for the more normal, rule considering types of people, it's best to stay away from ones like that.
You can apologize anytime for calling me a childish name though, just don't even bother to address me as "honey" anything-especially disrespectfully...there's very few that I even acknowledge such familiarity from, and anything else, from anywhere else, I attribute to ignorance.
But dew yew have yerself a nice day.

Ahh, yet another clone, how original, parrot what???

Not surprised you have no idea, you being so short in the comprehension stakes as you are but that’s acceptable from you.

No I don’t make the rules of the game, I just follow the rules of the game because I enjoy the game. You may be too ego-testical to realise that topix is not YOUR game but the game of any one who wants to contribute and when you attempt to insult those other players then you should not be surprised at the comeback.

Uhhuh.'Nuff said.eh???

What have parrots got to do with you objecting to people having there own view? With people having a different outlook to you? From your point of view I would have thought one so vocal as you about originality would consider that as originality – hypocrite much?

No need to apologise for fact honey bitch. See, not your game… Live with it

So you admit your ignorance, well done, very brave of you.

[anonymous]

There can be only one!

[UTweetDeyTweetNo tallTweet]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>

I try.

Want to watch a blender crush? Let me just grab some dat ignoRANTs outa your hole of dysfunctional and we'll see what Concocts!!

[UTweetDeyTweetNo tallTweet]

anonymous wrote:

There can be only one!

And anything else is an imposter lol.

[UTweetDeyTweetNo tallTweet]

ChristineM wrote:

<quoted text>
Ahh, yet another clone, how original, parrot what???
Not surprised you have no idea, you being so short in the comprehension stakes as you are but that’s acceptable from you.
No I don’t make the rules of the game, I just follow the rules of the game because I enjoy the game. You may be too ego-testical to realise that topix is not YOUR game but the game of any one who wants to contribute and when you attempt to insult those other players then you should not be surprised at the comeback.
Uhhuh.'Nuff said.eh???
What have parrots got to do with you objecting to people having there own view? With people having a different outlook to you? From your point of view I would have thought one so vocal as you about originality would consider that as originality – hypocrite much?
No need to apologise for fact honey bitch. See, not your game… Live with it
So you admit your ignorance, well done, very brave of you.

An say hi to duh (yer) mazzer in and of "BUMpusses"... from us sane, ethical, and decent ones lol.

[UTweetDeyTweetNo tallTweet]

anonymous wrote:

There can be only one!

and in the language of "ewes" .....bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.(and related goats need not bother!)

[ChristineM]

UTweetDeyTweetNotallTweet wrote:

<quoted text>
I try.
Want to watch a blender crush? Let me just grab some dat ignoRANTs outa your hole of dysfunctional and we'll see what Concocts!!

Yes your are very trying

What is “dat ignoRANTs outa”?, I am dyslexic and do have real problems when faced with deliberate stupidity

And it looks like you are now issuing threats, perhaps you should read the topix TOC before continuing with this game that you dream of owning

[ChristineM]

UTweetDeyTweetNotallTweet wrote:

<quoted text>
An say hi to duh (yer) mazzer in and of "BUMpusses"... from us sane, ethical, and decent ones lol.

Say what? Methinks you need to up your olanzapine dose

[ChristineM]

anonymous wrote:

There can be only one!

I am I

[The Dude]

Colorado Chick wrote:

<quoted text>. WHY would ANYONE want to CLONE anything? It's like creating ARTIFICIAL Flavors from the Original NATURAL Flavor?? The taste is NEVER exactly the same.. THERE is a slight difference.. BUT I just can't put my finger on it.

A clone of you still has everything you have, nothing would be different. Except for personal life experiences there is no biological difference. There would possibly be a few minor DNA bases different, but that happens with natural born twins too.

Colorado Chick wrote:

That's WHY we were created by the Master Creator himself..to REPRODUCE!! Reminds me of the movie.. The Boys From Brazil..create a Master Race..FREAKIN' SCARY!!

Yup, God created us all to shag, then gave its fundie followers the power to tell people exactly how and when to shag in what positions and even what to wear!

[The Dude]

HILLBILYHIPPYMAN wrote:

Even if the evolution theory is correct. Theres just too many chemical processes that would have to take place perfectly. Im quite sure that there was somthing out there for all the millions of chain reactions of chemicals to take place. Then PUFF, we are here. All thanks to our lord God.

What's "perfect"?

[The Dude]

chancelor wrote:

the universe is round..

This may not even make sense.

[Cybele]

Hidingfromyou wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, you're mistaken. Lots of plants can create clones or sexually reproduce. They decide which to do based on the environmental conditions around them. In favorable conditions, clone. In poor conditions, sexually reproduce.
Some lizard species are 100% clones - no male offspring, only females. All daughters share 100% of their genes with their mother, minus mutation.
All identical twins are clones. There's about 8 primate species that only reproduce in twins - golden lion tamarins, for example.
I honestly wish people would learn more about biology before they make pretense to authoritative statements about it. It's just misleading behavior.
In case you're wondering, most social insects are not actually clones of each other.

Yes I've heard of plants and lizards that can clone itself through pathenogenesis. Other than that, no other animal species are known to have this ability.

A twin is different really because twins still have the DNA of both parents from sexual reproduction, not from cloning process.

Yah I don't know where someone here got the information that insects clone. lol

[Cybele]

Hidingfromyou wrote:

<quoted text>
Yaaay!
What other theories would you like to "confirm" after the fact, with your own guesses?

I'm not sure but something does interest me. I read somewhere that genetic mutations take place in the cloning process and that it could be lethal that's why clones die off. I can't stop but wonder why this happens and how it could be fixed! lol

[Cybele]

Oh HidingFromYou lady, I think I have a theory that raises a question. Since our repair systems correct damage to DNA, are these repair systems that 'fail' during the cloning process? How do we strengthen our DNA repair systems so that lethal mutations can be avoided?

[Hidingfromyou]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes I've heard of plants and lizards that can clone itself through pathenogenesis. Other than that, no other animal species are known to have this ability.
A twin is different really because twins still have the DNA of both parents from sexual reproduction, not from cloning process.
Yah I don't know where someone here got the information that insects clone. lol

- a lot of species reproduce via pathenogenesis - i.e., assexually (it's not limited to lizards and plants...)

- sure, twins aren't clones of their parents, but clones of each other

- all drone bees are clones...

[The Dude]

Cybele wrote:

Yes I've heard of plants and lizards that can clone itself through pathenogenesis. Other than that, no other animal species are known to have this ability.
A twin is different really because twins still have the DNA of both parents from sexual reproduction, not from cloning process.

Doesn't matter.

Cybele wrote:

I'm not sure but something does interest me. I read somewhere that genetic mutations take place in the cloning process and that it could be lethal that's why clones die off. I can't stop but wonder why this happens and how it could be fixed! lol

Mutations also take place when twins are born naturally. Even idential twins can have a few DNA bases different.

Cybele wrote:

Oh HidingFromYou lady, I think I have a theory that raises a question. Since our repair systems correct damage to DNA, are these repair systems that 'fail' during the cloning process? How do we strengthen our DNA repair systems so that lethal mutations can be avoided?

We don't. The reason you have mutations not shared by either of your parents (even though you're not a twin) is because of mutation. This is a natural part of evolution. People will naturally end up with mutations no matter whether they reproduce naturally or are cloned. But attempting to stop the process of evolution is a bad idea. Without evolution doing what it does you would not be here.

[ChristineM]

Hidingfromyou wrote:

<quoted text>
- a lot of species reproduce via pathenogenesis - i.e., assexually (it's not limited to lizards and plants...)
- sure, twins aren't clones of their parents, but clones of each other
- all drone bees are clones...

Clarification

Mono-Zygotic twins begin their development from a single split egg and therefore with identical dna, clones of each other. Mutations through development account for the slight differences that can sometimes be observed

I have fraternal twins, not from the same egg and therefore not clones and actually as different as chalk and cheese

[MikeF]

Cybele wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes I've heard of plants and lizards that can clone itself through pathenogenesis. Other than that, no other animal species are known to have this ability.
A twin is different really because twins still have the DNA of both parents from sexual reproduction, not from cloning process.
Yah I don't know where someone here got the information that insects clone. lol

Phasmatodea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasmida

There are others.