Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216728 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70304 Jan 7, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
That is true.
Copy and paste of what I felt to be a qualitive description.
Thank you though for the affirmation!
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70305 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
Anyways, that brings me to another question.
Is there such thing as a religious sociopath?
Seriously?

See: al qeada, Hezbollah, Hamas....

Palestine Liberation Front (PLF)

10/8/1997


Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ)

10/8/1997


Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLF)

and on and on.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70306 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe. Because sociopaths are less organized in the head.
Seriously?

See: 9/11 attacks on the U.S.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70307 Jan 7, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
The elites? I think it is like with immigration. The fundamentalist teabagger types have a knee-jerk support for Israel and the elites just tip-toe around them out of fear they will go totally bonkers if the government adopts a sensible policy.
The Brits are really to blame for the Israel/Palestinian thing. Not the Jews or the Moslems. What did they think would happen when they carved up the Holy Land between the Arabs and the...?
Now you're digressing into world history, for goodness sakes.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70308 Jan 7, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
What do good and bad really mean? The meanings of both terms is totally subjective. Genghis Khan probably thought that uniting much of Asia (...and into eastern Europe) was a good thing. The idiots burning suspected witches at the stake certainly felt they were doing good. During the Civil War both pro slavery people and abolitionists could quote scripture to prove God was on their side.
Most people are out to take care of themselves and their families... not to do good or evil.
I'm not talking about good or evil. I said good or bad. Ex. Good can mean acquiring or developing skills and bad can mean thinking negatively.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70309 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you don't understand what the disorder actually means and the consequences of it in our society. Why would bad always remain bad and the good remain good? We need balance. Just like Yin and Yang. duh!
Oh I absolutely understand people have disorders, multitudes of them in fact.
Even down to those who just like using excuses to blame others, to try and ciucumvent taking responsibility for their own bad behavior, poor choices etc etc.
And that parrot and repeat "balance thing" exhibits some rather "sociopathic" stalker type tendencies in and of itself--as in taking upon characteristics of another in attempts to feign some sort of individuality.
Humans do need balance in lots of ways, in proper nutrition, proper rest etc. New studies are showing more and more these days, just how real the negative effects are, that lack of proper resting and sleep, and structure, have on peoples phsysiologilical well being over all.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70310 Jan 7, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
What do good and bad really mean? The meanings of both terms is totally subjective. Genghis Khan probably thought that uniting much of Asia (...and into eastern Europe) was a good thing. The idiots burning suspected witches at the stake certainly felt they were doing good. During the Civil War both pro slavery people and abolitionists could quote scripture to prove God was on their side.
Most people are out to take care of themselves and their families... not to do good or evil.
And well they should.(take care of their families!)

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70311 Jan 7, 2013
AGOODelectronfield wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously?
See: 9/11 attacks on the U.S.
now you're just using semanTICS
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70312 Jan 7, 2013
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>No you aren't the only one. It isn't the first time I have noticed either. That comment about a gun weilding child killer is his hero because he killed himself was over the top. It is interesting that the babble became more incoherent when I went and found my post that set him off. There was nothing in it about my attacking a mentally handicapped person as he accused. It was very general and only an idiot would read what he read into it. I suppose the babble was the only real response he could give without admitting his stupidity.
It looks like you may be right. He is some kind of troll. As near as I can determine he made what seems like an admission of baiting you. I would call that being a troll.
I think I have made my point with him whether he wants to accept it or not. He is like some of the whackier creationists on these threads. They declare victory in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary and nothing you post will change that.
Stinkin' manipulative trolls, can't stay on topic for anything.

:-)

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#70313 Jan 7, 2013
AGOODelectronfield wrote:
<quoted text>
No, TICS are pests, and I am not "used" to "kill" anything, is that some sort of delusion? So why would everyone carry a dictionary, in the digital age, when even 8 year olds can find dictionary apps?
I'm the one who brought up the "app" first so why are you twisting things around? Kids who can read and don't have smart phones must have access to a dictionary. Yes that was the point until you used some obscurity in your language. lol
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70314 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not talking about good or evil. I said good or bad. Ex. Good can mean acquiring or developing skills and bad can mean thinking negatively.
Acquiring skills to use for GOOD, would be a "good". Using Science to make the world a BETTER place for example, would be good. TO use the same for bad, would be "bad". Al quada and the terorists who attacked America with learned " avaiation skills" for an example, is bad.

Everyone has negative thoughts, some are due to chemical imbalance, environmental factors, and a myriad of other reasons. That doesn't make necessarilythem "good" or "bad". Acting upon them in ways that would hurt themselves, or others, being the key difference there.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#70315 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not talking about good or evil. I said good or bad. Ex. Good can mean acquiring or developing skills and bad can mean thinking negatively.
Thinking negatively is bad? Many things should be approached only with a well deserved cynacism.

Politics is one example.

Science is another. One should always question new ideas.

Naivety on the other hand is bad. Like folks who think the absolute truth about everything was known to wandering tribes from the ancient Middle East.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70316 Jan 7, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>

Theism and atheism are COMPLETELY irrelevant to science.
Huh, that sounds familiar too lol.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70317 Jan 7, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
To the casual listener it sounds like apologetics for Shubie's quantum god-poofing.
That's why the study of electron fields.

"In the beginning, there WAS light".

Tsk, and sigh.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70318 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
now you're just using semanTICS
Not all...the jihadist terrorist attacks on America were PolTICal-as in PoliTICal Terrorism".

No "semantics" to that.

Political terrorism is a form of terrorism (a tactic of violence that targets civilians) used to influence socio-political events so that gains occur that might not have otherwise happened by peaceful means. There are obviously different types of psychic terror, from religious and magical terror, to fear of the natural world. Criminal terrorists — those who use blackmail, intimidation, and the promotion of fear — are differentiated from political terrorists because the former seek to enrich themselves, whereas for the latter, it is a sine qua non that terrorist action is motivated and justified by the furtherance of an objective cause.( wordIQ.com )

----------
Definitions

There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”(28 C.F.R. Section 0.85).

The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorist organization.....( FBI.gov )
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70319 Jan 7, 2013
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm the one who brought up the "app" first so why are you twisting things around? Kids who can read and don't have smart phones must have access to a dictionary. Yes that was the point until you used some obscurity in your language. lol
Actually, the hard back editions of the mention of dictionaries came first. Try to stay focused.

So, MY point as stated first, is still, absolutely VALID.

Kids should have access to dictionaries...be it what ever means. I personally prefer the presences of BOOK editions as well, because no not everyone has instant access to internet.

Nor should it allowed unrestricted in classrooms.

That is part of the PROBLEM these days...too much drivel and USELESS technology JUNK, and off topic garbage, and NOT enough actual studying, or staying ON TASK...no matter what teh task might be.
AGOODelectronfie ld

London, KY

#70320 Jan 7, 2013
neutral observer wrote:
<quoted text>
Thinking negatively is bad? Many things should be approached only with a well deserved cynacism.
Politics is one example.
Science is another. One should always question new ideas.
Naivety on the other hand is bad. Like folks who think the absolute truth about everything was known to wandering tribes from the ancient Middle East.
Otay -boredum sets ineth now. Cheerio mateys lol.

“Pissing people off since 1949”

Level 8

Since: Apr 08

Indianapolis, IN

#70321 Jan 7, 2013
AGOODelectronfield wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the hard back editions of the mention of dictionaries came first. Try to stay focused.
So, MY point as stated first, is still, absolutely VALID.
Kids should have access to dictionaries...be it what ever means. I personally prefer the presences of BOOK editions as well, because no not everyone has instant access to internet.
Nor should it allowed unrestricted in classrooms.
That is part of the PROBLEM these days...too much drivel and USELESS technology JUNK, and off topic garbage, and NOT enough actual studying, or staying ON TASK...no matter what teh task might be.
We have a joke in education:
Drop a book? You pick it up.
Drop an iPad? You sweep it up.
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#70322 Jan 7, 2013
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
We have a joke in education:
Drop a book? You pick it up.
Drop an iPad? You sweep it up.
Ohhhh that's not funny!

Shame on you!

NO DROPPING the ipads lol.
neutral observer

West Palm Beach, FL

#70323 Jan 7, 2013
AGOODelectronfield wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, the hard back editions of the mention of dictionaries came first. Try to stay focused.

So, MY point as stated first, is still, absolutely VALID.

Kids should have access to dictionaries...be it what ever means. I personally prefer the presences of BOOK editions as well, because no not everyone has instant access to internet.

Nor should it allowed unrestricted in classrooms.

That is part of the PROBLEM these days...too much drivel and USELESS technology JUNK, and off topic garbage, and NOT enough actual studying, or staying ON TASK...no matter what teh task might be.
Of course we need dictionaries. Rely on things like spell check and you get a word but not usually the right one. More likely it will choose blew when you need blue or through when you need threw.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 15 min Knowledge 154,701
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 22 min Another Damn Liberal 48,576
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 5 hr karl44 23,504
Richard Dawkins tells the truth 15 hr Timmee 9
Science News (Sep '13) 20 hr _Susan_ 3,985
Might life have spontaneously have started mill... Sun The Northener 642
News Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) Dec 3 Aura Mytha 179,707
More from around the web