You didn't, I have the exchange and you went on a knee jerk rant.<quoted text>
I gave you every reason to explain yourself about choosing to call a Asperger's patient "evil". You didn't think that was necessary so it escalated. Are you going to make that assertion again?
I already explained that I had no idea of any mental illness possesses by the shooter. You didn't ask about that at the time, you just assumed an went on.
I think the shooter was evil based on the very reasons I supplied previously. If you hadn't informed me about his condition, I would have eventually found out about it in the paper, but it would not have changed my mind. We can go on and on about this and no doubt you would.
You really like to consider yourself above things, but your previous exchange with me shows me otherwise. I actually read your posts and asked questions. You skimmed mine, made errors in comprehending what I said and then drew conclusions based on those errors.
I am not trying to rehash anything. I am comfortable with my assessment and position. I am merely pointing out that you are attacking someone by claiming the same offense you perpetrated on me. Would you prefer I be dishonest and not mention it. You really work hard to come out on top no matter the stablility of your position. A very Alpha male quality if you don't mind my saying.
As to going off topic, I was enjoying your exchange with Cybele about company politics and work. I found your comments interesting and insightful.