Evolution vs. Creation

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008. Full Story
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69345 Dec 31, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
and the lesson is?...those in power mis-use the idea of God to promote their own agendas.
The exact same way they do today.In fact, it's the exact same thing that you are doing.
Except it's what you are doing - ignoring divinely sanctioned killing to pretend your favourite religious book is chock-fulla good morals. The reality is that it is in some places, and in others it ain't. And that if it weren't for some of those people in ancient history "misusing the idea of God" as you put it, you might not have been Christian today. As they were after all the Christian ruling class who ultimately passed down the religion down the generations.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#69346 Dec 31, 2012
Given that a *majority* of Americans already support the legal recognition of same-sex marriage, it's hardly going against the tide to demand that the United States deal with it.
anonymous wrote:
Statistics, eh? It sure seems to me that that the voting record disagrees.
We have no voting record on this issue at the national level.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#69347 Dec 31, 2012
Free from what?
Bible Belt wrote:
Free from sin and worthy of eternal life.
What is "sin"?
WhatDoesJesusDo

Hazard, KY

#69348 Dec 31, 2012
Fill the needs, for those that allow him.
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#69349 Dec 31, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
The only wrong assumption was that I would consider even pulling others into it. ;)
At least you actually know what Goth is, many do not, so I have to give you credit for that. Nano has made the failed assertion many times, yet every time evidence is request it backs out like a scared child and gets others to do it's dirty work, thinking that will somehow either excuse it's lies, or make us forget that Nano started the lies in the first place.
Feel free to not respond to the bulk of this and crop it from any response so as to avoid being sucked into the web of dishonesty, I shall not blame you.
From what I've observed, Nanoanomaly and Cybele both believe in a sort of intuitive mysticism which they are working out through this anonymous forum dialog. They are not patient enough to be empirical thinkers and they aren't independent enough to keep free of the usual politics even though they would like to be.

Probably, they are both under thirty years old, and may not see their older selves looking back at them. Hopefully, we see something of our youthful determination in them. Life goes on!

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#69350 Dec 31, 2012
So you're saying that you have no *objective* evidence that supports a claim that homosexuality is merely about people lusting after their own bodies. Yeah, we figured that.
Cybele wrote:
Bodies have sexual organs.
One of those sexual organs is the human brain, which determines whether we're attracted to members of the same sex or members of the opposite sex.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69351 Dec 31, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
The act of homosexuality is sex without reproduction. Yes, I call that a disease. It's harmful to biology. The slippery slope was always there. You just don't like the wording. That's not my problem.
So condoms are a disease and harmful to biology. Recreational hetrosexual sex is also sex without reproduction. It is also a disease and harmful to biology. Didn't figure you to be one of those fundie-type abstinence only idiots.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69352 Dec 31, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
It is called CHRISTianity after all...based on the teaching of the Christ. Even Christ chastise their barbaric ways.
Christ said not one letter of the law shall change. This is contrary to many a fundie's assertion that somehow the nasty old laws were thrown out once Jesus came riding in on his triceratops.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69353 Dec 31, 2012
WhatDoesJesusDo wrote:
Fill the needs, for those that allow him.
I need gay sex! Will he fill that need for me? Or just more of that placebo nonsense?

:-/
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69354 Dec 31, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
More or less what I've been saying.
It doesn't have to be considered a "disease" but if it's a highly disruptive pattern of behavior, I won't contest the label. I absolutely do reserve my right to defend myself against advances by a homosexual without being accused of a hate crime.
(guy touches you on shoulder)

"Hey man, buy you a drink?"

"Nah, just waiting for my GF. Thanks anyway!"
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#69355 Dec 31, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually methinks American Communists don't view themselves as trying to bring down the Government but rather have it operate differently. But let's face it, most of America doesn't know the difference between Communism and Stalinism. But I digress...
<quoted text>
So religion is based on genetics? Really?
<quoted text>
Well the creationists HAVE been trying to do that for over a century. So far (thankfully) they've been unsuccessful for the most part. Doesn't mean to say they won't stop trying though.
Communism is not democracy, period. Marx never addressed checks and balances, but put his faith in a natural ruling class. What you really want to address is socialism, which has never been fully defined as a method of government. It's partially Keynesian economics and partially social engineering. The economics, I like, the social engineering needs work.

You missed my point. Discrimination based on religion IS the exception. My view is that religion is inherently discriminatory, but then we wouldn't need a vote if we agreed on everything. Let religion work out the ethics of our choices, but let democracy work out the budgets, the legal protocols and the agendas of the nation.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69356 Dec 31, 2012
Bible Belt wrote:
<quoted text>The stone in my profile picture is a real Kentucky agate. I post using the name FREE SERVANT at times.
And that's the image of Jesus you say? Looks more like Barney.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#69357 Dec 31, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
From what I've observed, Nanoanomaly and Cybele both believe in a sort of intuitive mysticism which they are working out through this anonymous forum dialog. They are not patient enough to be empirical thinkers and they aren't independent enough to keep free of the usual politics even though they would like to be.
Probably, they are both under thirty years old, and may not see their older selves looking back at them. Hopefully, we see something of our youthful determination in them. Life goes on!
You don't think that my conclusions are not based on empirical evidence? I am newtral. You know like newt gingrich
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#69358 Dec 31, 2012
MikeF wrote:
<quoted text>
And, unlike yourself, I will provide them when asked.
<quoted text>
So you say.
You've never asked. Just saying.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69359 Dec 31, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
I went to grade school where a Jehovah's witness was scolded, and made by the teacher to stand in the hallway, because he refuses to recite the pledge of allegiance because it gave allegiance to the government before god..which was against his beliefs.
Kid should'a sued the fecker. "Before God" wasn't even in it until that dolt Billy Graham came along with his pro-Christian=anti-Commie rhetoric.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69360 Dec 31, 2012
anonymous wrote:
<quoted text>
Communism is not democracy, period. Marx never addressed checks and balances, but put his faith in a natural ruling class. What you really want to address is socialism, which has never been fully defined as a method of government. It's partially Keynesian economics and partially social engineering. The economics, I like, the social engineering needs work.
Hey, I didn't say it was perfect.(shrug)
anonymous wrote:
You missed my point. Discrimination based on religion IS the exception. My view is that religion is inherently discriminatory, but then we wouldn't need a vote if we agreed on everything. Let religion work out the ethics of our choices, but let democracy work out the budgets, the legal protocols and the agendas of the nation.
Except let religion do that only for individuals, not imposed on other groups. For example, the ethics of homosexuality. Many who oppose equal rights for gays use religion as the excuse. Others however are more open about their bigotry.

“what we think we become”

Level 5

Since: Aug 11

above and beyond

#69361 Dec 31, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
So you're saying that you have no *objective* evidence that supports a claim that homosexuality is merely about people lusting after their own bodies. Yeah, we figured that.
<quoted text>
One of those sexual organs is the human brain, which determines whether we're attracted to members of the same sex or members of the opposite sex.
Are you referring to intellectual intercourse? So you think the brain is a sexual organ?
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#69362 Dec 31, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
(guy touches you on shoulder)
"Hey man, buy you a drink?"
"Nah, just waiting for my GF. Thanks anyway!"
You have GOT to be kidding me!!
<young me sitting on a bench at the mall. old gnarly guy walks up and sits down>
him: Wanna suck?
me: What?!
him: Wanna suck?
me: <stands up, startled>
him: <stands up>
me: <sits down>
him:<sits down>
me: <gets up, walks away quickly>
him: <gets up and walks away in the other direction, blending into the crowd>

That's how it goes when you've got witnesses. When you don't, a lot more chances are taken.

Clueless!
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#69363 Dec 31, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> Jesus existed. You are just wasting your time trying to deny the impossible.
Yeah, I suppose it is a waste of time denying the existence of zombies. They definitely got to your brains.
anonymous

Franklin, PA

#69364 Dec 31, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, I didn't say it was perfect.(shrug)
<quoted text>
Except let religion do that only for individuals, not imposed on other groups. For example, the ethics of homosexuality. Many who oppose equal rights for gays use religion as the excuse. Others however are more open about their bigotry.
My point is that marriage should not be a government function. The government should not endorse one behavior over another and civil unions and marriage should carry the same legal status but no legal or economic privilege, period.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
An atheistic view on evolution vs. a godly view... 29 min Dogen 504
How would creationists explain... 39 min Chimney1 317
god is not real!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jun '06) 3 hr Ooogah Boogah 13,617
24 hour dental emergency (Nov '13) 10 hr Zach 4
Science News (Sep '13) 15 hr positronium 2,943
Genetic entropy Thu Discord 159
What you should know about Tuesday's vote on ev... (Feb '08) Wed IAMIOOWAN 516
More from around the web