Evolution vs. Creation

Evolution vs. Creation

There are 216723 comments on the Best of New Orleans story from Jan 6, 2011, titled Evolution vs. Creation. In it, Best of New Orleans reports that:

High school senior Zack Kopplin is leading the fight to repeal the Louisiana Science Education Act of 2008.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Best of New Orleans.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#68481 Dec 29, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>I know, I was joking and the Dude knows an agate isn't a meteor either. I have a collection of agates with pictures in them, for real!
No you do not.

You may have a collection of agates with minerals encased within it that TO YOU suggests an image.....but it is not a 'picture'.

Have you heard of a Rorschach ("Inkblot") test?
TheIndependentMa jority

London, KY

#68482 Dec 29, 2012
Cybele wrote:
<quoted text>
You really need to learn more about psychology. We are all animals with the same instincts unless you're made of candle wax. You really need that flame to get enlightened.
Stop accusing me of justifying these heinous crimes. I just happen to 'understand' what drives humans to do certain things. comprende?
SOME humans have the ability of SELF control... as well as the ability to listen to a little thing called a conscience-in knowing right vs wrong (including in the areas of "Do Unto other others, as one would wish to be treated themselves" per say) BETTER than others.

FACT.

For the ones that DON'T and only wish to USE some lame "we're all animlas" EXCUSE to try and justify thier own NOT as good "behavior"-oh well..that's their problem, NOT anyone elses!!!!!!!!!!
FREE SERVANT
#68483 Dec 29, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
No you do not.
You may have a collection of agates with minerals encased within it that TO YOU suggests an image.....but it is not a 'picture'.
Have you heard of a Rorschach ("Inkblot") test?
WEll then! Its a funny thing to me that I have shown some of them to people who say they see the same thing as I do before I tell them what I see in them.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68484 Dec 29, 2012
Thomas Robertson wrote:
Why don't we pull the no-true-Scotsman plea?
If the Connecticut school shooter was embarrassing to Evolutionists, then let's say that he wasn't a true Evolutionist.
Creationists always bring Haeckel's name up, so let's say that Haeckel wasn't a true Evolutionist.
Lets just say, that no TRUE Christian would not kill another on the grounds of their beliefs...

But on the other hand Evolutionists have no such qualms.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68485 Dec 29, 2012
Richard Robles wrote:
The connecticut school shooter was an Atheist ... nuff said! The world would be a happier place without Islam and Atheism.
"Anders Behring Breivik was a practicing militant Darwinian Atheist racist. He believed secularism and science was the world's salvation, not Jesus Christ."
Anders Behring Breivik, Mass Murderer of Norway, was an Atheist Social Darwinist - NOT a Christian
http://cross.tv/69392
.
Degrading the deaths of children just for your own political agenda, you disgust me, especially since you base it on a lie, from a site of people who are so vile they have to do the same thing. You lessen the value of life lost through your own idiocy, which you do simply because you are insecure about your own ideas, you know you're wrong, but you need that excuse to justify doing vile things like this.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68486 Dec 29, 2012
For the same reason that they adopted the false religions of the Greek and Roman gods.
Charles Idemi wrote:
But none of them were made the official religion of the whole empire apart from Christianity.
Wrong. From your favorite source, Wikipedia:

"Rejection of the state religion was tantamount to treason. This was the context for Rome's conflict with Christianity, which Romans variously regarded as a form of atheism and novel superstitio."

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68487 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
Lets just say, that no TRUE Christian would not kill another on the grounds of their beliefs
So you're saying that TRUE Christians *would* kill another on the grounds of their beliefs.

Yes, we would agree that they would do that.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68488 Dec 29, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>I know, I was joking and the Dude knows an agate isn't a meteor either. I have a collection of agates with pictures in them, for real!
Just like how when clouds look like puppy dogs it proves there are puppy dogs? Or what about when you see a cloud that looks like a pegasus, that makes pegasus real? Or one that looks like a fairy means all fairies are real? Perhaps the one that looks like a horse means you will get a horse soon ... someday?

It's called anthropomorphizing, and we do it with everything, naturally. The mind prefers patterns so we seek out patterns then assign labels to them based on what we know, it's a form of memory/information compression, who instead of remembering the details, you just remember the vague connection to an idea that's already in your mind, typically from mythology, as those concepts are just vague enough for the mind to use easily.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68489 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets just say, that no TRUE Christian would not kill another on the grounds of their beliefs...
But on the other hand Evolutionists have no such qualms.
Still with the no true Scotsman fallacy. Based on your fallacy, if it was true, then that means we can't trust anyone who claims they are christian ... even you.
FREE SERVANT
#68490 Dec 29, 2012
I was at a wal mart getting pictures copied of one of my agates when I showed it to one of the guys working there and he not only saw what I had seen but pointed out details that I had not looked at before. The picture was clear to him before I told him what I saw.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68491 Dec 29, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>WEll then! Its a funny thing to me that I have shown some of them to people who say they see the same thing as I do before I tell them what I see in them.
People do the same with inkblots.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68492 Dec 29, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're saying that TRUE Christians *would* kill another on the grounds of their beliefs.
Yes, we would agree that they would do that.
ahhh..so you would twist the meaning...very devilish of you.. Is it not?lol
FREE SERVANT
#68493 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
People do the same with inkblots.
BUT these are seen time after time and some people just take a little longer to focus and see what it appears to be, and others have jokingly made funny comments that the don't see anything.

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#68494 Dec 29, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Still with the no true Scotsman fallacy. Based on your fallacy, if it was true, then that means we can't trust anyone who claims they are christian ... even you.
So who shall we trust... Evolutionists who adhere to their own agenda... regardless of morals... like you?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68495 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
So who shall we trust... Evolutionists who adhere to their own agenda... regardless of morals... like you?
You meant Gravitationists.

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68496 Dec 29, 2012
So you're saying that TRUE Christians *would* kill another on the grounds of their beliefs. Yes, we would agree that they would do that.
xxxooxxx wrote:
ahhh..so you would twist the meaning
I didn't twist anything. You wrote "no TRUE Christians would not kill another on the grounds of their beliefs".

If "*no* TRUE Christians would *not*", that's the same as "TRUE Christians *would*".

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#68497 Dec 29, 2012
FREE SERVANT wrote:
<quoted text>BUT these are seen time after time and some people just take a little longer to focus and see what it appears to be, and others have jokingly made funny comments that the don't see anything.
Um, you think they were joking?

Inkblots are seen time after time. As a matter of fact what you "see" in the inkblot is extremely telling in what type of personality, person, and belief system you have. It has proven accurate enough that even psychologists use it, not just the quack psychiatrists. What you report "seeing" in the inkblot is your subconscious, anthropomorphic, images based on what you imagine or even see in the real word, and enhanced by what your mind focuses on. When you focus on Rah a lot, you will see Rah in everything, when you focus on unicorns a lot, you will see unicorns in everything, when you focus on any mythology a lot, that will always be what you "see" in any random configuration of colors, even in agates. It's such a well understood phenomenon that there is a huge database of references for the responses to cross reference now and formulate an almost perfect profile of a person, with nothing more than random colors.

So no, your agates are no different than inkblots, you see what you want to see, or what you expect to see, even if it's not there. Post photos of them, without saying what they are, let us look. You won't because you know we'll not see what you see, if we see anything. Not seeing any imagery in the randomness is specific personality type, actually, one that we refer to as "skeptical."

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#68498 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
So who shall we trust... Evolutionists who adhere to their own agenda... regardless of morals
You mean, the "agenda" of science, which is to observe the evidence and then create theories to explain it?

As opposed to the agenda of creationists, which is to start with scripture and try to interpret everything to fit, even when it doesn't?
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#68499 Dec 29, 2012
xxxooxxx wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently you science book thumpers fail to make the distinction between true Christians, and wolves in sheep's clothing.lol
I'm quite sure that the victims of the Inquisition weren't too concerned with "true" Christians, since, at minimum, it was them who allowed the Inquisition to come into existence.
anonymous

Chagrin Falls, OH

#68500 Dec 29, 2012
Charles Idemi wrote:
<quoted text> How about Leela, Pierre, is she your wife or daughter?
Numbskull?lol
That's too vague to have meaning, but from what I can google, it sounds racist.

I don't have time for that nonsense! I must get back to stealing Mr. Crab's secret recipe! Pee off!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 min One way or another 48,568
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 42 min marksman11 154,697
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 4 hr karl44 23,504
Richard Dawkins tells the truth 13 hr Timmee 9
Science News (Sep '13) 19 hr _Susan_ 3,985
Might life have spontaneously have started mill... Sun The Northener 642
News Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) Dec 3 Aura Mytha 179,707
More from around the web