That's because you ignored inconvenient posts.Evos have had nothing to say at all about junk dna.
Chicken-teeth. They aren't normally expressed in chickens because the DNA is non-coding.Creationists can actually make predictions around non coding dna and vestigial organs. There will be none if mankind was created rahter than evolved.
I can:Evolutionists cannot not make a prediction around dna. It is that simple. Refute that with evidence and more than your humble and uneducated opinion. They can't.
Except you've never once been able to support Goddidit with magic. If you can then tell us how that passes the scientific method.Do we now why you can't? Because creos can support their view and evos are left walking up the garden path of evasion along with all their evolutionary cohorts here.
Already pointed out function is not the problem here. The DNA inheritance pattern is. Only evolution explains it.80% of the genome is now known to be functional and is validating creationist predictions.
Since they do not support your conclusions you are quotemining.Here is the published and peer reviewed research.
Already explained. They are comparing larger datasets of DNA groups, hence the different measurement method. A VERY simple pure base-by-base comparison shows humans and chimps are closest match. Even other creationists don't dispute this, but instead appealing to "common design", which is really taking the predictions made by evolution after the fact.Here is a paper written by evolutionists including one from the Max Plank Institute in Germany. This paper speaks to the myth of 1%. This paper supports my view that indeed evolutionists have no credible method of dna comparison. Evo results are fictiously biased. Rather evolutionary researchers ignore all differences then zero in on some tiny bit of sequence and start applying their preconcieved assumptions and algorithmic magic.So evos suggest man is closely related to a chimp because they are 1% similar or 80% different. Make up your mind.
Your baseless opinions are irrelevant. Your absurd claims are constantly rebutted which in turn are subsequently not addressed. And you always avoid the hypocrisy of your own alternative which guarantees you cannot ever win any debate, as your alternative is non-falsifiable and internally contradictory.Hence TOE is not a science it is a philosophy trying to be a science and failing miserably it seems. Evos just refuse to see it. Its a matter of unfounded pride. Others here believe in some form of dribble yet will ridicule others.
The majority of you evos be you theist or atheist are as closed minded as any religious bigot has a right to be.
Now I guarantee you that you will come back with a woffly reply or none at all, as opposed to a view I provide backed by research data given a creationist interpretation.
Alternatively you are welcome to call the evolutionary researchers quoted above idiots if you like. We may have some point of agreeance on that.