Evolution vs. Creation

[The Dude]

Knightmare wrote:

Basically if you say evolution is true, vampires, werewolves and zombies MUST exist.
If you can prove evolution, then there should be proof of vampires, werewolves and zombies.
Or you can try proving the existence of vampires, werewolves and zombies and by proxy prove evolution.
Either/or is fine by me.

You are a nightmare.

To KITTENS.

[Kong_]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
Vampires, werewolves and zombies are just the beginning.
What about aliens that abduct people and experiment and probe them? If evolution were true we could find real evidence of alien evolution in certain human DNA that have been altered by these abductions but so far nothing. So once again evolution is an epic fail.
{By the way...thank you...I am honored. Nice to be noted for something worthy.}

The adjective "epic" is warranted....but for the above post.
Now we not only have vampires and werewolves, but we also have zombies and butt-probing aliens to blame Evolution on?!!??

Really?

Where do you get your information from, Skippy?

[Knightkore]

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
The adjective "epic" is warranted....but for the above post.
Now we not only have vampires and werewolves, but we also have zombies and butt-probing aliens to blame Evolution on?!!??
Really?
Where do you get your information from, Skippy?

So you can't answer a logical, scientific problem with evolution?

[MikeF]

Knightmare wrote:

Basically if you say evolution is true, vampires, werewolves and zombies MUST exist.
If you can prove evolution, then there should be proof of vampires, werewolves and zombies.
Or you can try proving the existence of vampires, werewolves and zombies and by proxy prove evolution.
Either/or is fine by me.

You really have no freaking idea at all of what you're talking about, do you? If your intention was to come across as a complete goofball, congratulations. You've exceeded your wildest dreams.

[Knightkore]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
You are a nightmare.
To KITTENS.

Kittens I love...vampire bat crossed with kittens even better. Oh...another thing evolution has failed to produce. So another proof against evolution.

[Kong_]

Knightmare wrote:

Basically if you say evolution is true, vampires, werewolves and zombies MUST exist.
If you can prove evolution, then there should be proof of vampires, werewolves and zombies.
Or you can try proving the existence of vampires, werewolves and zombies and by proxy prove evolution.
Either/or is fine by me.

Gotta be a Poe.

C'mon, fess up.

NOBODY could be this stupid and be able to type.

[Knightkore]

MikeF wrote:

<quoted text>
You really have no freaking idea at all of what you're talking about, do you? If your intention was to come across as a complete goofball, congratulations. You've exceeded your wildest dreams.

Actually, I am very serious..."undeadly" serious as it were.

Why can't you answer the obvious hole found with the proof of evolution?

[Knightkore]

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
Gotta be a Poe.
C'mon, fess up.
NOBODY could be this stupid and be able to type.

I am not the one unable to scientifically answer this very obvious problem with evolution.

So my conclusion then is evolution has to be as fake as vampires, werewolves, zombies and probing aliens.

[15th Dalai Lama]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
Kittens I love...vampire bat crossed with kittens even better. Oh...another thing evolution has failed to produce. So another proof against evolution.

You are not suited for fundamentalism. You should switch to macramé or tropical fish before it's too late.

[MikeF]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I am very serious..."undeadly" serious as it were.
Why can't you answer the obvious hole found with the proof of evolution?

What obvious hole? All you've presented is gibberish.

[Knightkore]

MikeF wrote:

<quoted text>
What obvious hole? All you've presented is gibberish.

I have been presented reasons why evolution cannot possibly be true and you and others have yet to give me any scientific reason why my conclusions are wrong.

[Knightkore]

15th Dalai Lama wrote:

<quoted text>
You are not suited for fundamentalism. You should switch to macramé or tropical fish before it's too late.

How do you mean? I am not a fundamentalist. I am just your normal average Templar Knight putting forth theories that people that are I assume smarter than me are not able to answer.

[MikeF]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been presented reasons why evolution cannot possibly be true and you and others have yet to give me any scientific reason why my conclusions are wrong.

You've presented nonsense and are apparently incapable of realizing it.

[Kong_]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
How do you mean? I am not a fundamentalist. I am just your normal average Templar Knight putting forth theories that people that are I assume smarter than me are not able to answer.

No, what your doing is analogous to running around in a school classroom with your soiled underwear on your head and yelling at the top of your voice "I'm a smelly fish! I'm a smelly fish!".

Your thoughts(?) about vampires, werewolves, zombies and such are a clear indication that you have no damn idea what you're talking about as it pertains to the ACTUAL Theory of Evolution.

[TedHOhio]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been presented reasons why evolution cannot possibly be true and you and others have yet to give me any scientific reason why my conclusions are wrong.

No you have not presented anything suggesting evolution is wrong. You have made a fairly significant error in logic. A negative, such as a lack of vampires, cannot be used to support a positive statement, such as - therefore evolution is not true.

If you seriously wish to attempt this discussion then you have to offer evidnece as to why vampires should exist if evolution were to be true. Only when you have supported your first contention can you possible claim that the lack of vampires is evidence that evolution is not true.

Your argument has been called a strawman. I also suggest in additioin to researching your current subject, you look up what a strawman argument is -- and you might see why your argument fails to hold any water -- holy or otherwise. Care to give it a go?

[Kong_]

edit..."you're"

[Knightkore]

MikeF wrote:

<quoted text>
You've presented nonsense and are apparently incapable of realizing it.

Actually I have presented logical scientific ideas and you are incapable of answering them.

Now come on...vampires, werewolves and zombies. If evolution were true then obviously and logically these three would HAVE TO exist.

[Knightkore]

TedHOhio wrote:

<quoted text>
No you have not presented anything suggesting evolution is wrong. You have made a fairly significant error in logic. A negative, such as a lack of vampires, cannot be used to support a positive statement, such as - therefore evolution is not true.
If you seriously wish to attempt this discussion then you have to offer evidnece as to why vampires should exist if evolution were to be true. Only when you have supported your first contention can you possible claim that the lack of vampires is evidence that evolution is not true.
Your argument has been called a strawman. I also suggest in additioin to researching your current subject, you look up what a strawman argument is -- and you might see why your argument fails to hold any water -- holy or otherwise. Care to give it a go?

Two things: I will present evidence why vampires, werewolves and zombies HAVE TO exist in order for evolution to be real.

And you use the same logic by arguing a negative concerning creation. By saying there is a lack of whatever you say there is a lack of concerning creation.

[Knightkore]

Kong_ wrote:

<quoted text>
No, what your doing is analogous to running around in a school classroom with your soiled underwear on your head and yelling at the top of your voice "I'm a smelly fish! I'm a smelly fish!".
Your thoughts(?) about vampires, werewolves, zombies and such are a clear indication that you have no damn idea what you're talking about as it pertains to the ACTUAL Theory of Evolution.

Evolution is the basis of how some scientists assume that the world around us and even how the universe became the way it is. A theory of origins. Whether the universe or human origins etc.

And going with that theory evolution is said to have developed by random chance by keeping what works and dealing with problems over millions of years.

Now, wouldn't you think that evolution would have evolved something that would solve the problems of death?

I put forth that after millions of years if evolution has not randomly found a way to evolve any of us into vampires, werewolves and zombies to counteract death then evolution is just as much fictional as these creatures.

[T Leary]

Knightmare wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually I have presented logical scientific ideas and you are incapable of answering them.
Now come on...vampires, werewolves and zombies. If evolution were true then obviously and logically these three would HAVE TO exist.

By this "logic" and I use that word loosley. We should also have a Santa Clause, elves, lepracans, faries, 3 eyed toads, birds that eat dirt... make up anything.

Since you seem to know so much about evolution please expain to us why or why not does ERV's in DNA prove or disprove evolution.

BTW: Your post are among the most ignorant I have ever seen on the internet. You are either a POE or have absolutly NO idea what evoloution is. For you sake I hope you are a POE, otherwise you need to seek professional help.