Senapathy's idea of the Independent Birth of Organisms
Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum
Haywards Heath, UK
#1 Aug 23, 2012
I have subscribed to Darwinism until I came across the ideas of Senapathy. I wondered then and now whether if Darwin was a prisoner of the thinking of his days, as we all are, of a single Deity or God.
However, If Senapathy is a atheist and molecular biologist and is not a creationist as is said by some of his critics, then why a single primordial pond? I am not an evolutionary biologist and so cannot argue with facts, but I am well versed with the concept of a scientific paradigm. I do not oppose Senapathys ideas as I would consider myself an evolutionary skeptic. Another problem idea I have are the echoes of Eugenics with the concept of Natural Selection and how it had the support of luminaries such as Fisher, and Churchill. I also know that to change a current paradigm requires very strong ideas, and evidence. I am not certain that Senapathy has supplied both. It also contrasts with the way The Origin of Species sold out and went into reprint so quickly. Was there a hunger for new ideas in those days? Can more knowledgeable people please enlighten me?
#2 Aug 23, 2012
No problem, Shadow. You're both still cranks.
Add your comments below
|can anyone explain to me why humans are the onl... (Mar '08)||3 min||Reno Hoock||180|
|Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11)||4 min||Tinka||201,418|
|Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09)||8 min||It aint necessari...||16,139|
|"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12)||10 min||_Susan_||40,669|
|The conscious God or the inanimate nature||1 hr||THE LONE WORKER||34|
|Scientists create vast 3-D map of universe, val...||3 hr||Chazofsaints||15|
|Book aims to prove existence of God (Nov '09)||3 hr||ChristineM||96|
Find what you want!
Search Evolution Debate Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC