Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#182 Jan 9, 2014
Dogen wrote:
You have any SCIENTIFIC reference?
Yes. Why haven't you noticed? I'll tell you why.you haven't noticed. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." —Albert Einstein.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#183 Jan 9, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Yes. Why haven't you noticed? I'll tell you why.you haven't noticed. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." —Albert Einstein.
Except it was investigated and your apologetics was found to be anti-reality creationist bullshit. However you suffer from a severe form of Black Knight syndrome.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#184 Jan 9, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Yes. Why haven't you noticed? I'll tell you why.you haven't noticed. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." —Albert Einstein.

And condemnation with investigation is the height of intelligence.

Makes you the ignorant one. knowwhatimean?

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#185 Jan 9, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Yes. Why haven't you noticed? I'll tell you why.you haven't noticed. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." —Albert Einstein.
There you go quoting famous people that actually did something so you can feel like you rank.

Einstein never visited your NothingImportantHere.com .

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#186 Jan 9, 2014
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Except it was investigated and your apologetics was found to be anti-reality creationist bullshit. However you suffer from a severe form of Black Knight syndrome.

BKS. Really bad. No cure.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#187 Jan 10, 2014
3. The DNA copying process is imperfect; there are random, frequently occurring single-character misspellings, deletions, insertions, duplications, translocations and inversions.5

Given that natural selection has the tendency to overproduce diverse offspring change is bound to happen.(as Darwin allready posed)

To really curtail this process we need design as in IVF with extreme selection.

in nature you would have to lok long and wide to not find this.

Sanford we know of the prison experiment, but i fear this is the bloke shooting at plants again.
Slash and burn.

See nothing grows anymore!

I'm still mystified about shubee not getting it.

Puts me in mind of Darwin being a child of his victorian eara.
Producing lots of kids that had not all the same chances of surviving.
But after finding out about sexual evolution (prancing around with a big tail does not enhance natural evolution) and the male of the species being 15% bigger as a result of females selecting.
He deduced that the female brain also had to be smaller and that it had no use to let women study.
Since some of his male kids were retarded the man missed an opportunity as wel as his daughters.
Fact is that women have a better developed neural network.
And given that we need schooling for about twenty years to just live successfully in a modern western society we have pushed towards selection by having fewer kids that can however have the best life possible.

Well anyway the male of the species will go extinct.
So 5 million years from now i'll bet some chappies like shubee and dark blue will state that a designer made it so.
Even further down the line:Losing the moon and our place in the galaxy will make people even unaware of the galaxy.
I can't even fanthom what ideas people will have but it must be close to those dark ages of inventing gods again and a geo centric view.

““You must not lose faith ”

Level 5

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#188 Jan 10, 2014
What Stanford left out purposefully is the infinite variety natural selection produced when left to it's own devices.

Only in extreme cases as in eating all elephant eggs or natural catastrophes or too small a population so negative traits develop; so curbing nature we will see what Sanford describes.

So his thesis is disingenious.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#189 Jan 11, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> How careless of me. I should have cited the support: everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf
Sorry bub but referencing your own cite does not help you. Bring your evidence here if you have any.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#190 Jan 11, 2014
MAAT wrote:
3. The DNA copying process is imperfect; there are random, frequently occurring single-character misspellings, deletions, insertions, duplications, translocations and inversions.5
Given that natural selection has the tendency to overproduce diverse offspring change is bound to happen.(as Darwin allready posed)
To really curtail this process we need design as in IVF with extreme selection.
in nature you would have to lok long and wide to not find this.
Sanford we know of the prison experiment, but i fear this is the bloke shooting at plants again.
Slash and burn.
See nothing grows anymore!
I'm still mystified about shubee not getting it.
Puts me in mind of Darwin being a child of his victorian eara.
Producing lots of kids that had not all the same chances of surviving.
But after finding out about sexual evolution (prancing around with a big tail does not enhance natural evolution) and the male of the species being 15% bigger as a result of females selecting.
He deduced that the female brain also had to be smaller and that it had no use to let women study.
Since some of his male kids were retarded the man missed an opportunity as wel as his daughters.
Fact is that women have a better developed neural network.
And given that we need schooling for about twenty years to just live successfully in a modern western society we have pushed towards selection by having fewer kids that can however have the best life possible.
Well anyway the male of the species will go extinct.
So 5 million years from now i'll bet some chappies like shubee and dark blue will state that a designer made it so.
Even further down the line:Losing the moon and our place in the galaxy will make people even unaware of the galaxy.
I can't even fanthom what ideas people will have but it must be close to those dark ages of inventing gods again and a geo centric view.
Sanford must be right if the deleterious mutation rate is high enough to counter natural selection and the positive effects of mutations.

So, for example, spraying a population with massive radiation levels could result in his feared outcome.

The question is whether mutations in natural situations with natural selection operating are too high for natural selection to work and the answer, empirically, is no.

Evolution works.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#191 Jan 11, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry bub but referencing your own cite does not help you. Bring your evidence here if you have any.
As far as I know, everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf is the only mathematized version of Sanford’s postulates. My advice is that you wait for others to write on this topic. Until then, please explain why you and Zombie Zionists don’t recognize the government’s hostility to a scientific investigation of 9/11 and why government puppets contradict the reliable eyewitness testimonies of firemen and first-responders that were actually present at ground-zero on 9/11.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#192 Jan 11, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> As far as I know, everythingimportant.org/genome.pdf is the only mathematized version of Sanford’s postulates. My advice is that you wait for others to write on this topic. Until then, please explain why you and Zombie Zionists don’t recognize the government’s hostility to a scientific investigation of 9/11 and why government puppets contradict the reliable eyewitness testimonies of firemen and first-responders that were actually present at ground-zero on 9/11.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lESol88wOi0XX

Okay, a conspiracy nut as well as a pseudoscience and religious nut.

SDAs think your nuts. That is just, WOW.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#193 Jan 11, 2014
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, a conspiracy nut as well as a pseudoscience and religious nut.
SDAs think your nuts. That is just, WOW.
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Flattery is praise and praise is worship. I advise that you stop worshiping the pope, who very happily accommodates great evil and adapts to it with incredible cowardice and hypocrisy just to further his own shameless, self-serving purposes.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#194 Jan 11, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Flattery is praise and praise is worship. I advise that you stop worshiping the pope, who very happily accommodates great evil and adapts to it with incredible cowardice and hypocrisy just to further his own shameless, self-serving purposes.

You are having a psychotic break. Get back on your meds.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#195 Jan 11, 2014
Dogen wrote:
You are having a psychotic break. Get back on your meds.
I also strongly advise you to not mock the third angel's message, since the penalty for that is eternal death in a lake of fire. http://everythingimportant.org

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#196 Jan 12, 2014
Shubee wrote:
<quoted text> I also strongly advise you to not mock the third angel's message, since the penalty for that is eternal death in a lake of fire. http://everythingimportant.org

I mock mentally ill people. Not angels.
Level 6

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#197 Jan 12, 2014
Depraved ignoramuses aren’t expected to comprehend everythingimportant.org but that bold synopsis of courageous real-world truths is the most definitive exposition of the three angels’ messages available.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#198 Jan 12, 2014
Shubee wrote:
Depraved ignoramuses aren’t expected to comprehend everythingimportant.org but that bold synopsis of courageous real-world truths is the most definitive exposition of the three angels’ messages available.
You my friend are a comedic genius.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#199 Jan 12, 2014
Shubee wrote:
Depraved ignoramuses aren’t expected to comprehend everythingimportant.org but that bold synopsis of courageous real-world truths is the most definitive exposition of the three angels’ messages available.

If you don't understand it then how can you comment on it.

“I am Sisyphus”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#200 Jan 12, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
<quoted text>You my friend are a comedic genius.

You can't write comedy this good.

“Don't be mad at me.”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

I'm just a little bunny.

#201 Jan 12, 2014
Dogen wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't write comedy this good.
I know. He just keeps the laughter flowing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 26 min messianic114 163,817
News Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) 1 hr UncommonSense2015 178,616
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 2 hr dirtclod 141,337
has science finally debunked the 'god' myth? 11 hr UncommonSense2015 10
News Darwin on the rocks (Sep '14) Sun Chimney1 1,871
How can we prove God exists, or does not? Sat Kong_ 80
News British Ban Teaching Creationism As Science, Sh... (Jul '14) Sat Swedenforever 159
More from around the web