The religion of Darwin who was an apo...
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
DarwinPaul

Houston, TX

#41 Dec 26, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you have yet to come up with a single "atheist lie" to back your claims.
On the other hand, your own posts on topix already show that you are an unrepentant liar.
Typical atheist, accuse a lie often enough and it becomes fact. Thanks Goebbels.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#42 Dec 26, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you have yet to come up with a single "atheist lie" to back your claims.
On the other hand, your own posts on topix already show that you are an unrepentant liar.
I was going to reply to Darwin's last post (above), but you're post here is much more eloquent.

Kudos.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#44 Dec 28, 2013
DarwinPaul wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical atheist, accuse a lie often enough and it becomes fact. Thanks Goebbels.
No. Facts are things that are out there and verifiable, such as your claims about what Einstein said, that you cannot back up, compared to my claims about what Einstein said, which were Einstein quotations and flatly contradicted your claims.

In other words, its not me behaving like Goebbels here, its YOU.

You think if you keep up your insane ranting, it will somehow pass for truth, whereas the facts of this case show you are lying. No matter how many times you pretend otherwise.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#45 Dec 28, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Facts are things that are out there and verifiable, such as your claims about what Einstein said, that you cannot back up, compared to my claims about what Einstein said, which were Einstein quotations and flatly contradicted your claims.
In other words, its not me behaving like Goebbels here, its YOU.
You think if you keep up your insane ranting, it will somehow pass for truth, whereas the facts of this case show you are lying. No matter how many times you pretend otherwise.
Everyone who is seriously interested in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe – a spirit vastly superior to man, and one in the face of which our modest powers must seem humble.-Albert Einstein.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#46 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone who is seriously interested in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe – a spirit vastly superior to man, and one in the face of which our modest powers must seem humble.-Albert Einstein.
Einstein:

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own—a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."

"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."

He was an agnostic and the concept of God for him was merely the order manifest in the universe, not a personal Deity. Nothing in Einstein's beliefs was incompatible with the ToE, or the BBT, or the existence of his version of God, which is nothing like the garbage idiots like DarwinPaul want to foist on us.

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#47 Dec 28, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Einstein:
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own—a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."
He was an agnostic and the concept of God for him was merely the order manifest in the universe, not a personal Deity. Nothing in Einstein's beliefs was incompatible with the ToE, or the BBT, or the existence of his version of God, which is nothing like the garbage idiots like DarwinPaul want to foist on us.
Einstein said a lot. That we both can agree on.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#48 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone who is seriously interested in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe – a spirit vastly superior to man, and one in the face of which our modest powers must seem humble.-Albert Einstein.
Here is the more ORIGINAL translation of this quote:

"On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind, which differs essentially from the religiosity of more naive people."

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/12/16/spiri...

Somewhat different from the quote you supplied, no?

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#49 Dec 28, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is the more ORIGINAL translation of this quote:
"On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind, which differs essentially from the religiosity of more naive people."
http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/12/16/spiri...
Somewhat different from the quote you supplied, no?
From your same source, which is where I got my quote as well. You can see there are many versions of it depending upon which book it came from.

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/12/16/spiri...

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#50 Dec 28, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>From your same source, which is where I got my quote as well. You can see there are many versions of it depending upon which book it came from.

http://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/12/16/spiri...
Upon re-reading the entire link, I found this:

The full quote is as follows:

“Scientific research is based on the assumption that all events, including the actions of mankind, are determined by the laws of nature. Therefore, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, that is, by a wish addressed to a supernatural Being. However, we have to admit that our actual knowledge of these laws is only an incomplete piece of work (unvollkommenes Stückwerk), so that ultimately the belief in the existence of fundamental all-embracing laws also rests on a sort of faith.

All the same, this faith has been largely justified by the success of science. On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind, which differs essentially from the religiosity of more naive people.

With friendly greetings, your Albert Einstein.”

“It is what it is”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

Location hidden

#51 Dec 28, 2013
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
Upon re-reading the entire link, I found this:
The full quote is as follows:
“Scientific research is based on the assumption that all events, including the actions of mankind, are determined by the laws of nature. Therefore, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, that is, by a wish addressed to a supernatural Being. However, we have to admit that our actual knowledge of these laws is only an incomplete piece of work (unvollkommenes Stückwerk), so that ultimately the belief in the existence of fundamental all-embracing laws also rests on a sort of faith.
All the same, this faith has been largely justified by the success of science. On the other hand, however, every one who is seriously engaged in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that the laws of nature manifest the existence of a spirit vastly superior to that of men, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. The pursuit of science leads therefore to a religious feeling of a special kind, which differs essentially from the religiosity of more naive people.
With friendly greetings, your Albert Einstein.”
Yes there are several versions of quotes on that page. The bad thing is we will never know what his true quotes are for each site seems to have a little different version than the other sites. Most blame it on poor translations.
DarwinPaul

Matawan, NJ

#52 Dec 28, 2013
Chimney1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Einstein:
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own—a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."
"The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish."
He was an agnostic and the concept of God for him was merely the order manifest in the universe, not a personal Deity. Nothing in Einstein's beliefs was incompatible with the ToE, or the BBT, or the existence of his version of God, which is nothing like the garbage idiots like DarwinPaul want to foist on us.
Thanks for quoting wikipedia LOL

One thing is certain, Einstein was not an immature, easily fooled, unworthy of pride, mentally challenged, brainwashed atheist.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#53 Dec 29, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
Einstein said a lot. That we both can agree on.
And everything he said was compatible with evolution but not with belief in a Biblical notion of God, a book which he claimed was primitive and childish.

Level 6

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#54 Dec 29, 2013
DarwinPaul wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for quoting wikipedia LOL
One thing is certain, Einstein was not an immature, easily fooled, unworthy of pride, mentally challenged, brainwashed atheist.
Wikipedia is merely a compilation from the original sources, referenced at the bottom of the page.

Are you another brainwashed git who automatically believes that if it comes from Wiki its part of the conspiracy? Why of course you are. Rhetorical question.

Point to note: what he actually said still makes a mockery and a lie of your claims. Can't you be man enough for once to admit it?
DarwinPaul

Houston, TX

#55 Dec 30, 2013
suncore wrote:
The religion of Darwin who was an apostate preacher teaching his evolution relighion.
Stephen J. Gould of Harvard admitted, "The fossil record with its abrupt transitions offers no support for gradual change." I assume that all college professors know that Darwin admitted the same fact.(I also assume they know that Darwin was not trained as a scientist but for the ministry, so evolutionists are worshipping at the feet of an apostate preacher!) Charles Robert Darwin studied ministry at Cambridge.
David Pilbeam, a Harvard University paleoanthropologist, says:
"If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and showed him the meagre evidence we've got he'd surely say, "forget it; there isn't enough to go on."
World famous scientist, G. G. Simpson stated, "It is inherent in any definition of science that statements that cannot be checked by observation are not about anything...or at the very best, they are not science."
Evolution is about as scientific as a voodoo rooster plucking ceremony in Haiti. Almost.
Dr. David Kitts, professor of geology at the University of Oklahoma said, "Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them...."
Swiss scientist Dr. A. E. Wilder-Smith (who recently died), with three earned doctorates in science and considered to be an expert by the United Nations, confessed after seeing the fossilized dinosaur tracks and men prints within inches of each other at Glen Rose, Texas, "...all this makes evolution impossible."
Not even considering that a more rational explanation exists than that of the inbred Charles and his fellow Darwin-Wedgewood inbreeds is shall we say...unscientific?

<chortle chortle smirk smirk>
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#56 Dec 31, 2013
DP, do you even know or care what science is? Nope.

So you got caught lying again.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 16 min Dogen 1,418
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 25 min u196533dm 32,462
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 5 hr Genesis Enigma 163,074
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 5 hr Aura Mytha 222,270
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) Mon Dogen 78,757
Mathematicians PROVED evolution IMPOSSIBLE! Aug 19 Science 814
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... (Jan '17) Aug 5 yehoshooah adam 4,381
More from around the web