Yeah but you are kind of missing the point.<quoted text>
WOW you are a real God hater. How did you come up with Goddidit with magic from talking about the definition of kind?
Again the question was;
How would science fill in the blank in this sentence?
Largemouth bass, smallmouth bass, rock bass, stripe bass are all different species but all are __________
1. kinds of Bass.
2. types of Bass.
3. fill in your own.
Now it was answered with members of the family Centrarchidae.
The next question was;
Now how would the other 99% of the English language speaking people finish that same sentence?
And you give dumb it down and Goddidit with magic for an answer. LOL.
Point being all are not scientists and do not speak in scientific terms and you feel that is reason to ridicule the way they word something? It is petty and stupid. Like you think you could hang with scientists, do their work and talk their lingo. They would leave you behind eating dirt.
Superficially, the word "kinds" seems to cover it and the bible story makes sense. But when we look more closely at how life is arranged and at evolutionary relations even including those creationists cannot deny and call 'micro', the whole idea of kinds dissolves into nonsense. When you look into their attemots at kind based classification they end up in al sorts of unresolvable problems. I have seen creatonists trying ti determine the magic line sparating human and ape and they cannot do it.
The primary problem for them is convergence, predicted by evolution and observed repeatedly, where clearly different kinds today are found to converge to a common point. Ape hominid, cat dog, dino bird, even amphibian fish.
Kinds as a concept does not even begin to manage these observations, but evolition both predicted and explains them