continuing on evolution (from the "Existential Series"
Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum
Since: Feb 13
#1 May 29, 2013
Already sent Parts I, II, and III, begging with "A brilliance hurtled" ...concluding with "the mind of man and my condemnation of both Creationist and Darwinist narrow-,mindedness.
Now to continue, I'll further scramble the tolerance of some readers with my "un-answer" of the proverbial question.
CONCERNING WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR EGG
1. Anything before the first chicken was not yet a chicken.
It was a pre-chicken.
2. Any “chickenish” modification of the prechicken would be
an “acquired characteristic” and thus not inheritable.
3. Any inheritable modification of the prechicken would not
modify the prechicken itself into a chicken because genetics
don’t program proteomics in reverse ... or in more laymanic
terms, what is is not what it becomes until it does.
4. Therefore, there is no occurrence of chicken until an egg
containing the DNA configuration which thence determines
what develops within and then hatches as uniquely variant
from prechicken state.
5. It may seem obvious at this point that egg had to have come
first. But we must understand a breadth of the term which
encompasses “ovum”-- and even that the fertilizing sperm
cell could be the conveyance of the necessary nuanced genetic
material for the variance from prechicken to chicken to occur.
6. The degree of gene-induced modification (here and in other
cases of variation) may be of such infinitessimal subtlety in
state of the individual and the unit-time perspective ...that one
must consider the progresswion of prechicken to chicken as an
equation of sequential-molecular systematology, not some
sudden specie-state innovation. Our focus on “species” may be
but stop-motion observations primarily differentiating life into
“forms” based on our observation of “states” of forms’ formations.
But then again, there may be sudden “saltations”(macro-mutations) which
result in significant genetic change in very short time-frames.)
It should be considered that even though the egg is the first ting to contain the genetic nuance which is necessary for the chicken to be born variant from the prechicken in the ongoing “existential flow” of life-forms ... until the contents of the egg hatch, it’s still an egg. therefore, even though the prechicken is not a chicken and thus the chicken vould not have come first, the chicken does have to come first in that its predecessor-form is but a variant egg,.
Add your comments below
|Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17)||6 min||dollarsbill||4,964|
|What's your religion?||9 min||Subduction Zone||94|
|It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09)||16 min||ChristineM||165,434|
|"Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12)||1 hr||Dogen||85,619|
|Humans evolved from Canadians||13 hr||Mystic science||1|
|Evolution of the Tennessean species||13 hr||Mystic science||1|
|Experiment In Evolution, Genetic Algorithms and...||15 hr||was auch immer||10|
Find what you want!
Search Evolution Debate Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC