continuing on evolution (from the "Ex...

continuing on evolution (from the "Existential Series"

Posted in the Evolution Debate Forum

Level 2

Since: Feb 13

Leominster, MA

#1 May 29, 2013
Already sent Parts I, II, and III, begging with "A brilliance hurtled" ...concluding with "the mind of man and my condemnation of both Creationist and Darwinist narrow-,mindedness.

Now to continue, I'll further scramble the tolerance of some readers with my "un-answer" of the proverbial question.


1. Anything before the first chicken was not yet a chicken.
It was a pre-chicken.

2. Any “chickenish” modification of the prechicken would be
an “acquired characteristic” and thus not inheritable.

3. Any inheritable modification of the prechicken would not
modify the prechicken itself into a chicken because genetics
don’t program proteomics in reverse ... or in more laymanic
terms, what is is not what it becomes until it does.

4. Therefore, there is no occurrence of chicken until an egg
containing the DNA configuration which thence determines
what develops within and then hatches as uniquely variant
from prechicken state.

5. It may seem obvious at this point that egg had to have come
first. But we must understand a breadth of the term which
encompasses “ovum”-- and even that the fertilizing sperm
cell could be the conveyance of the necessary nuanced genetic
material for the variance from prechicken to chicken to occur.

6. The degree of gene-induced modification (here and in other
cases of variation) may be of such infinitessimal subtlety in
state of the individual and the unit-time perspective ...that one
must consider the progresswion of prechicken to chicken as an
equation of sequential-molecular systematology, not some
sudden specie-state innovation. Our focus on “species” may be
but stop-motion observations primarily differentiating life into
“forms” based on our observation of “states” of forms’ formations.
But then again, there may be sudden “saltations”(macro-mutations) which
result in significant genetic change in very short time-frames.)

It should be considered that even though the egg is the first ting to contain the genetic nuance which is necessary for the chicken to be born variant from the prechicken in the ongoing “existential flow” of life-forms ... until the contents of the egg hatch, it’s still an egg. therefore, even though the prechicken is not a chicken and thus the chicken vould not have come first, the chicken does have to come first in that its predecessor-form is but a variant egg,.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) 6 min dollarsbill 4,964
What's your religion? 9 min Subduction Zone 94
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 16 min ChristineM 165,434
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr Dogen 85,619
Humans evolved from Canadians 13 hr Mystic science 1
Evolution of the Tennessean species 13 hr Mystic science 1
Experiment In Evolution, Genetic Algorithms and... 15 hr was auch immer 10
More from around the web