So let's see what we can gather from your post:<quoted text>
actually there is no proof of evolution, no transitional fossils, carbon dating doesnt give accurate info..
how did any organism survive the developmental stages without dying off...if all the systems were in the process of developing, the organism couldnt function and live and pass on any information, so they wouldve died off. and how did women carry and feed babies while they were still not fully human?? fine if you dont want to be accountable to a higher being but the theory of evolution is just dumb with no proof...if u want to beleive u came from a rock...well thats up to u... but since when EVER does life come from non-life?? it goes against any scientific law
You deny evolution, and by extention all science. You don't understand said science. You mistakenly assume evolution to be equivalent to atheism. You claim the theory of evolution has "no proof", yet you yourself believe in some kind of "higher being" without a shred of proof either. You mistakenly assume evolution to be dependent on abiogenesis. You don't understand abio either. You claim that life from non-life goes against "scientific law", despite the fact that the idea of creation by a 'higher being'*specifically requires* it to create life from non-life. You complain about violating "scientific law" despite the fact that again your own alternative hypothesis also requires violating current known laws of science. And you're blissfully unaware of the extreme danger you pose to the lives of cute little kittens.
Did I miss anything?