Evolution is a Fact

Evolution is a Fact

There are 284 comments on the News24 story from May 21, 2013, titled Evolution is a Fact. In it, News24 reports that:

Teachers won't have any reason to underperform when they realise that government is taking them seriously, says Ace Moloi .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#101 May 26, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
The moon does not have the correct environment for life to appear.
For life as we know it to exist liquid water is a must. If you understood just the least little bit about science you would understand why liquid water is impossible on the Moon.
That's my point. Why is Earth the only planet blessed with the things needed for life? After all what made up Earth in the big bang theory was just chunks of floating space material. So again why is Earth the only one that can support life? Just luck?

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#102 May 26, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Yes, Infinite Farce, you are a fool. You are trying to place absolutes on systems where there is no reason to put absolutes. And of course most important, you are trying to use bad logic to argue against proper logic and science. First off whenever you are discussing a scientific concept or theory the first thing you have to use is the scientific method.
I don't know what you believe, but we have massive evidence that supports the theory of evolution. What do you believe and why?
You are a willingly ignorant fool and this is the worse fool type you can have because it's your type that label sound thinkers like myself as fools ::nodding head::, I don’t know if I want to continue this argument with you, because I like to argue with honest people who are seeking to learn and make progress and this will never happen arguing with a willingly ignorant fool like yourself.

You understand what an opposite term is and to label that term one way and then turn around and label that term as an opposite meaning is a contradictory statement and yet you still hurl insults at me (which you are free to do) and still want to be willingly ignorant and not admit what I am saying is correct. This is why you can’t trust human interpretations on nature alone and this is why I use the law of non-contradiction to be the final judge of all information projected by scientist and researchers because sad to say, some have the same mentality as you do!

Its people with your way of thinking that stop progress in science.
To answer your last question, I am not religious I am a universal conscience individual who only understands, accepts and knows universal concepts and ideas that does not violate the law of non-contradiction found in nature. I am also an independent scientific researcher in environmental science and Extra Terrestrial technology. The reason why I am this is because I see myself as a care taker on a universal scale because my way of thinking is on the universal scale and this is my purpose in life because I love doing it!

GOD and/or Extra Terrestrial(s) as being the originator of life and bio-diversity is an issue I am still probing and it’s not a subject I can argue with you about because you reject nature/reality as being an absolute and it takes the accepting and knowing of absolute only to get up to the understanding about Extra Terrestrials and/or GOD, because their system is on a universal scale when they deal with issues like the creation of life and/or problems within civilizations etc..

Anyways, the biological sciences when it comes to the scientific method and the theory of evolution is flawed and have to be re-written when it comes to biological diversity as not being fixed. Likewise, the scientific method philosophical view when it comes to logic must be adapted to Aristotle the law of non-contradiction because to say all evidence must be falsifiable to be accepted in science is flawed, because all empirical evidence in nature is an absolute and cannot be falsified as non-existence. I end my scientific statements hear with you! GOOD DAY!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#103 May 26, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
That's my point. Why is Earth the only planet blessed with the things needed for life? After all what made up Earth in the big bang theory was just chunks of floating space material. So again why is Earth the only one that can support life? Just luck?
It is the only planet in our solar system that is "blessed" in this way. Again, basic science will tell you that only one planet will form in the "Goldilocks Zone". There are countless other planets in just our galaxy. Some of those are in the correct zone for life to evolve in. When you add all of the planets in all of the galaxies there are probably trillions of planets with life on them.

Right now there is no way to tell if there is life on other planets. The odds say, yes.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#104 May 26, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a willingly ignorant fool and this is the worse fool type you can have because it's your type that label sound thinkers like myself as fools ::nodding head::, I don’t know if I want to continue this argument with you, because I like to argue with honest people who are seeking to learn and make progress and this will never happen arguing with a willingly ignorant fool like yourself.
You understand what an opposite term is and to label that term one way and then turn around and label that term as an opposite meaning is a contradictory statement and yet you still hurl insults at me (which you are free to do) and still want to be willingly ignorant and not admit what I am saying is correct. This is why you can’t trust human interpretations on nature alone and this is why I use the law of non-contradiction to be the final judge of all information projected by scientist and researchers because sad to say, some have the same mentality as you do!
Its people with your way of thinking that stop progress in science.
To answer your last question, I am not religious I am a universal conscience individual who only understands, accepts and knows universal concepts and ideas that does not violate the law of non-contradiction found in nature. I am also an independent scientific researcher in environmental science and Extra Terrestrial technology. The reason why I am this is because I see myself as a care taker on a universal scale because my way of thinking is on the universal scale and this is my purpose in life because I love doing it!
GOD and/or Extra Terrestrial(s) as being the originator of life and bio-diversity is an issue I am still probing and it’s not a subject I can argue with you about because you reject nature/reality as being an absolute and it takes the accepting and knowing of absolute only to get up to the understanding about Extra Terrestrials and/or GOD, because their system is on a universal scale when they deal with issues like the creation of life and/or problems within civilizations etc..
Anyways, the biological sciences when it comes to the scientific method and the theory of evolution is flawed and have to be re-written when it comes to biological diversity as not being fixed. Likewise, the scientific method philosophical view when it comes to logic must be adapted to Aristotle the law of non-contradiction because to say all evidence must be falsifiable to be accepted in science is flawed, because all empirical evidence in nature is an absolute and cannot be falsified as non-existence. I end my scientific statements hear with you! GOOD DAY!
You could not find a more honest person to debate with than me.
Here are some of your flaws. You think that species are absolute and unchanging. Yes, a population will have not enough differences so that all members can breed with each other. Even then there can be troubles. How many couples have gone to fertility clinics when they can't have children? Now granted, most of the time it is because of a flaw in one or the other. Sometimes that is not the case.
Sadly you are clearly a deluded fool with delusions of adequacy.
Try to answer with a wall of nonsense that everyone will ignore.
What do you believe and why?
Clearly I believe the theory of evolution because of the mountains of scientific evidence that supports it. I am not afraid to say what I believe in. Why are you?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#105 May 26, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
The theory of evolution is nothing but a flawed abstract concept/idea that constantly contradicts its self and you are too gullible to see that! You have the blind leading the blind in here.
Before you start grabbing empirical evidence and trying to explain how it works there is a thing called speaking in contradictory terms and this is detected by the law of non-contradiction.
Let's spell this out again: You are a nut job.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#106 May 26, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
That's my point. Why is Earth the only planet blessed with the things needed for life? After all what made up Earth in the big bang theory was just chunks of floating space material. So again why is Earth the only one that can support life? Just luck?
http://www.slashgear.com/saturns-moon-titan-r...
www.npr.org/2012/08/05/158170844/life-on-mars...
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1112815793...

Don't you even consider googling something before making a fool of yourself? That's just one planet in the solar system, we have seen several in neighboring solar systems. Sheesh, it's like you don't even know what the internet is.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#107 May 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.slashgear.com/saturns-moon-titan-r...
www.npr.org/2012/08/05/158170844/life-on-mars...
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1112815793...
Don't you even consider googling something before making a fool of yourself? That's just one planet in the solar system, we have seen several in neighboring solar systems. Sheesh, it's like you don't even know what the internet is.
A fool of myself?? LOL. What you posted, links and all are just guesses and speculations unless you are one of those people that believe "if it is on the internet it must be true" One thing you have prove is that you believe things with out prove as long as someone says it is true or could be. LMAO

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#108 May 26, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's spell this out again: You are a nut job.
Since a nut job is someone who rejects the use of contradictory terms to explain the same phenomenon in nature like the theory of evolution does when it comes to a biological reproductive species, then I guess a non nut job like you accept contradictory terms to explain the same phenomena in nature when it comes to a biological reproductive species.

You are no different than the Christians and other religious people you argue with that up-hold contradictory information you hypocrite.

Hence, a biological reproductive species is either;

A. Compatible when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female off spring.

B. Incompatible when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female offspring.

The law of non-contradiction states you can’t choose both for your answer! But yet the theory of evolution interchanges A and B over eight million times with descent and modification and you call this a fact in the theory of evolution?!

Once again, the biological reproductive species term is used in contradictory over eight millions times and you accept this junk information! I beg the differ on whose the nut job on this one when it comes to accepting the use of a contradictory term over eight millions times!

CONCLUSION: EVOLUTION IS NOT A FACT!

“Wrath”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Is revenant

#109 May 26, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
Since a nut job is someone who rejects the use of contradictory terms to explain the same phenomenon in nature like the theory of evolution does when it comes to a biological reproductive species, then I guess a non nut job like you accept contradictory terms to explain the same phenomena in nature when it comes to a biological reproductive species.
You are no different than the Christians and other religious people you argue with that up-hold contradictory information you hypocrite.
Hence, a biological reproductive species is either;
A. Compatible when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female off spring.
B. Incompatible when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female offspring.
The law of non-contradiction states you can’t choose both for your answer! But yet the theory of evolution interchanges A and B over eight million times with descent and modification and you call this a fact in the theory of evolution?!
Once again, the biological reproductive species term is used in contradictory over eight millions times and you accept this junk information! I beg the differ on whose the nut job on this one when it comes to accepting the use of a contradictory term over eight millions times!
CONCLUSION: EVOLUTION IS NOT A FACT!
The fact still remains, that you are nut job.
The definitions of species stand , species branch and sub species are still somewhat reproductively viable. Different species are not reproductively viable, but freaks of nature do occur.
In contradiction , as I said the mystery of biology is as freakish as the mystery of life itself. There are no biological rules that cannot be bent.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#110 May 26, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact still remains, that you are nut job.
The definitions of species stand , species branch and sub species are still somewhat reproductively viable. Different species are not reproductively viable, but freaks of nature do occur.
In contradiction , as I said the mystery of biology is as freakish as the mystery of life itself. There are no biological rules that cannot be bent.
NATURE DOES NOT CONTRADICT IT'S SELF YOU WILLINGLY IGNORANT SELFISH FOOLS!

The empirical evidence you use is voided in support of this foolish abstract concept/idea called the theory of evolution.

“Contradictory premises”

“An argument (generally considered a logical fallacy) that draws a conclusion from inconsistent or incompatible premises.
Essentially, a proposition is contradictory when it asserts and denies the same thing.”

>>>> http://grammar.about.com/od/c/g/Contradictory...

A biological reproductive species is either/or;

A. COMPATIBLE when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female off spring.

B. INCOMPATIBLE when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female offspring because of descent with modification over billions of years.

The law of non-contradiction states you can’t choose both for your answer! But yet the theory of evolution interchanges A and B over eight million times with descent and modification and this proves that this abstract concept/idea is a logical fallacy when it comes to arguing for the theory of evolution.

Scientist and Researchers assert that a biological reproductive species is compatible when interbreeding and producing fertile offspring of both male and female. On the contrary, scientist and researcher assert that a biological reproductive species is incompatible when interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female with descent and modification over billions of years.

The theory of evolution is asserting and denying the same thing when it comes to a biological reproductive species and this violates the law of non-contradiction because you have a contradictory premises and it’s un-deniable! All of your empirical evidence and facts that you have to support the theory of evolution becomes IRRELEVANT because nature does not contradict itself!

THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES MUST BE RE-WRITTEN WHEN IT COME THE ORIGIN OF BIO-DIVERSITY AS NOT BEING FIXED!

IN ADDITION, THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS NOT SCIENCE BECAUSE THE ABSTRACT CONCEPT/IDEA IS A LOGICAL FALLACY AND SHOULD NOT EVEN MADE IT TO THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#111 May 26, 2013
Of course nature does not contradict itself. Your interpretation of evolution is wrong Infinite Force.

Evolution is observed in almost every aspect of biology. That means your interpretation of so your favorite law is wrong.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Planet Earth

#112 May 26, 2013
Subduction Zone wrote:
Of course nature does not contradict itself. Your interpretation of evolution is wrong Infinite Force.
Evolution is observed in almost every aspect of biology. That means your interpretation of so your favorite law is wrong.
You and kittenkodder is not that stupid/foolish, it’s you guys self-centered ego that’s blocking you from accepting what I am saying is valid! You know what a contradictory statement is and it's demonstrated and simplified for you to understand that you cannot use compatible and incompatible to explain the same thing and this is what the theory of evolution is doing. You and kittenkodder are not people of integrity when it comes being corrected and this is self-evident!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#113 May 26, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
You and kittenkodder is not that stupid/foolish, it’s you guys self-centered ego that’s blocking you from accepting what I am saying is valid! You know what a contradictory statement is and it's demonstrated and simplified for you to understand that you cannot use compatible and incompatible to explain the same thing and this is what the theory of evolution is doing. You and kittenkodder are not people of integrity when it comes being corrected and this is self-evident!
If it is self evident then you should be able to give a clear cut concise explanation here. So far I have seen you make sweeping claims but you back it up with nothing.

How does evolution violate the law of noncontradiction? Be clear, be precise.

Seriously, at the very least you misunderstand the theory.

Remember that we have observed evolution countless times in countless ways. If something is observed and it goes against a theory then the theory is wrong.

“Wrath”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Is revenant

#114 May 26, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
NATURE DOES NOT CONTRADICT IT'S SELF YOU WILLINGLY IGNORANT SELFISH FOOLS!
The empirical evidence you use is voided in support of this foolish abstract concept/idea called the theory of evolution.
“Contradictory premises”
“An argument (generally considered a logical fallacy) that draws a conclusion from inconsistent or incompatible premises.
Essentially, a proposition is contradictory when it asserts and denies the same thing.”
>>>> http://grammar.about.com/od/c/g/Contradictory...
A biological reproductive species is either/or;
A. COMPATIBLE when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female off spring.
B. INCOMPATIBLE when it comes to interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female offspring because of descent with modification over billions of years.
The law of non-contradiction states you can’t choose both for your answer! But yet the theory of evolution interchanges A and B over eight million times with descent and modification and this proves that this abstract concept/idea is a logical fallacy when it comes to arguing for the theory of evolution.
Scientist and Researchers assert that a biological reproductive species is compatible when interbreeding and producing fertile offspring of both male and female. On the contrary, scientist and researcher assert that a biological reproductive species is incompatible when interbreeding and producing fertile off-spring of both male and female with descent and modification over billions of years.
The theory of evolution is asserting and denying the same thing when it comes to a biological reproductive species and this violates the law of non-contradiction because you have a contradictory premises and it’s un-deniable! All of your empirical evidence and facts that you have to support the theory of evolution becomes IRRELEVANT because nature does not contradict itself!
THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES MUST BE RE-WRITTEN WHEN IT COME THE ORIGIN OF BIO-DIVERSITY AS NOT BEING FIXED!
IN ADDITION, THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS NOT SCIENCE BECAUSE THE ABSTRACT CONCEPT/IDEA IS A LOGICAL FALLACY AND SHOULD NOT EVEN MADE IT TO THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD!
You and a sack of rocks.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

#115 May 26, 2013
I think that I know Infinite Force's error. I am trying to see if I can get him to state his position more clearly.

Of course he is only another religious zealot who thinks he understands science. Sadly for him he is very very wrong.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#116 May 27, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
A fool of myself?? LOL. What you posted, links and all are just guesses and speculations unless you are one of those people that believe "if it is on the internet it must be true" One thing you have prove is that you believe things with out prove as long as someone says it is true or could be. LMAO
In other words, you did not read the articles and verify their sources. Do you even know what planet the articles are talking about? It would be funny if you think they're talking about Mars.

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#117 May 27, 2013
Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
You and kittenkodder is not that stupid/foolish, it’s you guys self-centered ego that’s blocking you from accepting what I am saying is valid! You know what a contradictory statement is and it's demonstrated and simplified for you to understand that you cannot use compatible and incompatible to explain the same thing and this is what the theory of evolution is doing. You and kittenkodder are not people of integrity when it comes being corrected and this is self-evident!
Incorrect, it is our education and study that allows us to see how stupid and insane you are. You are here for no other reason than to denounce something you know less about than a junior high school student.

“Ask Randy From Ballwin”

Level 5

Since: Mar 13

He Is A Sock Know It All

#118 May 27, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
In other words, you did not read the articles and verify their sources. Do you even know what planet the articles are talking about? It would be funny if you think they're talking about Mars.
I read them. They are talking about Saturn’s moon Titan. Hmmm lets see, Have we ever been there?--NO! Do we have anything from there?--NO! Do we plan on being there soon?--NO! So just on those few little questions it is all based on "speculation" and "guess" and "we thinks". But hey give them credit, the more they "speculate", "guess" and "we think" that keeps their free money flowing and keeps them in a job what is what it is all about.

“So it's not you, It's them?”

Level 9

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#119 May 27, 2013
Educationally-challenged, Flat-Earth, intellectually incurious, totally intolerant folks often earnestly say here that they "don't believe in anything they haven't seen with their own eyes.” Yet they believe in an angry, avenging, meddlesome, mythological, often cruel and uncaring supreme being. This while they so desperately believe in and regurgitate every word in the so-called "Good Book." They’re so entertaining, yet sad. How funny and ironic is it that they refuse to see their own hypocrisy?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#120 May 27, 2013
replaytime wrote:
<quoted text>
I read them. They are talking about Saturn’s moon Titan. Hmmm lets see, Have we ever been there?--NO! Do we have anything from there?--NO! Do we plan on being there soon?--NO! So just on those few little questions it is all based on "speculation" and "guess" and "we thinks". But hey give them credit, the more they "speculate", "guess" and "we think" that keeps their free money flowing and keeps them in a job what is what it is all about.
Yes, we have been there, our machines passed by it a couple of times. Nothing is 100% certainty, there's even a chance this is all part of the matrix and we're just in a computer simulator, does that alter what knowledge benefits us? Nope. What goes up out still comes back ... unless you eject it at escape velocity.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 22 min DanFromSmithville 40,333
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 55 min Reason Personified 15,818
can anyone explain to me why humans are the onl... (Mar '08) 1 hr Bob of Quantum-Faith 88
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr Aura Mytha 201,124
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 8 hr Dogen 151,416
Scientists create vast 3-D map of universe, val... Sat One way or another 6
The conscious God or the inanimate nature Sat Fear-God 8
More from around the web