Evolution is a Fact

May 21, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: News24

Teachers won't have any reason to underperform when they realise that government is taking them seriously, says Ace Moloi .

Comments
61 - 80 of 284 Comments Last updated Aug 13, 2013

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
May 23, 2013
 
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
I have tried very diligently to engage you in a scientific discussion. However, being the religious zealot that you are and being a complete stranger to the scientific method, you have no where to begin.
No, you haven't. You have made statements that show you have no idea what scientific evidence is. I have offered more than once to help you understand what is scientific evidence. You prefer to be ignorant.

Until you at the very least understand scientific evidence you cannot have a scientific discussion with anyone. And that is all your fault.

Religions has nothing to do with my beliefs. Though you are so dishonest as to not saying what your religious beliefs are shows that you are the only religious bigot here.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
May 23, 2013
 
HTS, if you want to carry on a scientific discussion then why are you so afraid to learn what scientific evidence is?

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
May 23, 2013
 
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to present a single coherent scientific argument to defend evolution. I realize what a tough assignment that is, given that there is nothing available.

Pardon me for seeing a major flaw in your reasoning.
Please explain what has driven the history of morphology in organisms on Earth since according to you it isn't evolution.
You will have to explain what it is, since you are in the know of whatever it is feel free to explain your theory or hypothesis so that the confusion of our science can be cleared up immediately,
and we will be enlightened by the knowledge of what is going on.

“Maccullochella macquariensis”

Since: May 08

Melbourne, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Storytelling is not science.
The evo-morons on this forum can't get that through their thick skulls.
You're right, story telling is not science. I guess that means you must be one of the evo-morons of which you speak, since you do nothing except tell (not very convincing) stories, with nary a shred of scientific evidence to back it up.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
May 24, 2013
 
I have corrected this post for you:

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T36...
HTS wrote:
I have tried very diligently to engage you in a scientific discussion. However, being the religious zealot that I am and a complete stranger to the scientific method, I have nowhere to begin.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
May 24, 2013
 
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
You have yet to present a single coherent scientific argument to defend evolution. I realize what a tough assignment that is, given that there is nothing available.
Sure there is. You dodged it every single time.

Seriously Harry, other than making yourself feel better by coming here and knowing that the existence of mean old people who have the nerve to disagree with you makes you righteous, you accomplish literally nothing. All your posts can be summed up as "I DISAGREE WITH YOU MEAN OLD ATHEISTS!"
HTS

Williston, ND

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Pardon me for seeing a major flaw in your reasoning.
Please explain what has driven the history of morphology in organisms on Earth since according to you it isn't evolution.
You will have to explain what it is, since you are in the know of whatever it is feel free to explain your theory or hypothesis so that the confusion of our science can be cleared up immediately,
and we will be enlightened by the knowledge of what is going on.
First, you need to separate yourself from the baseless evolutionary paradigm. No fossil on earth is millions of years old. You have no scientific evidence of such claims. You have nothing but wild assumptions.
HTS

Williston, ND

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure there is. You dodged it every single time.
Seriously Harry, other than making yourself feel better by coming here and knowing that the existence of mean old people who have the nerve to disagree with you makes you righteous, you accomplish literally nothing. All your posts can be summed up as "I DISAGREE WITH YOU MEAN OLD ATHEISTS!"
Your posts are nothing but the aimless spewing of hateful bigotry coupled with broad statements that all of nature is essentially explicable by the evo-fairy and pixie dust. I'm patiently waiting for some actual science, but you are so far removed from it you wouldn't recognize it if it fell in your lap.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
First, you need to separate yourself from the baseless evolutionary paradigm. No fossil on earth is millions of years old. You have no scientific evidence of such claims. You have nothing but wild assumptions.
Translation:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronom...
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Your posts are nothing but the aimless spewing of hateful bigotry coupled with broad statements that all of nature is essentially explicable by the evo-fairy and pixie dust. I'm patiently waiting for some actual science, but you are so far removed from it you wouldn't recognize it if it fell in your lap.
Another fine caricature from the fundie who doesn't know or care what science is. Feel free to try again Harry.

“ The Lord of delirious minds.”

Level 8

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
May 24, 2013
 
HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
First, you need to separate yourself from the baseless evolutionary paradigm. No fossil on earth is millions of years old. You have no scientific evidence of such claims. You have nothing but wild assumptions.
So the museums are full of what?

“I Am No One Else”

Level 7

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
May 24, 2013
 

Judged:

1

replaytime wrote:
You all live in your safe little world that you all think won't ever change.........
Um, it's the religious nuts like you that keep saying change is bad, we embrace change, we love it, you hate it, you fear it .... that's why you stick with that one religious text and never want to move ahead.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

HTS wrote:
<quoted text>
Your posts are nothing but the aimless spewing of hateful bigotry coupled with broad statements that all of nature is essentially explicable by the evo-fairy and pixie dust. I'm patiently waiting for some actual science, but you are so far removed from it you wouldn't recognize it if it fell in your lap.
You are wasting your time talking to that contradictory thinker, liar and fruit cake. All you have to do is pull out the contradictory card on the theory of evolution and it's over. State to him, since a great white and a human being is an incompatible biological reproductive species when it comes to successfully interbreeding and producing fertile male and female offspring, this concludes that they are opposite biological reproductive species. Watch how he answers this!

You see the theory of evolution is flawed severely when it uses descent with modification as the origin of biological reproductive species because by their model opposite/incompatible biological reproductive species are constantly being produced over millions and billions of years, and this is stating that nature contradict it’s self when they imply that the same biological reproductive species is “compatible” and over time they become “incompatible.” Hence, it’s like saying nature governs life and then saying nature does not govern life over millions and billions of years.

A biological reproductive species is either compatible or incompatible and you can’t choose both, if so this will violate the law of non-contradiction. The law of non-contradiction is a scientific method that I use to test the information proposed by scientist and researchers like the dude to test the soundness of the information they put out after interpreting and explaining how nature works. The law of non-contradiction states you can and cannot be at the same time and this is what the theory of evolution is doing. Just wanted to give you a tip and some ammo!
In explanation and source explaining what a biological reproductive species is.

“Biological / reproductive species Two organisms that are able to reproduce naturally to produce fertile offspring of both sexes. Organisms that can reproduce but almost always make infertile hybrids of at least one sex, such as a mule, hinny or F1 male cattalo are not considered to be the same species.”

>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Evolution is NOT A FACT! It's a flawed abstract concept/idea that contradicts the principles on how nature/reality works.

The information that scientist and researchers put out to support this flawed abstract concept/idea is in violation of the law of non-contradiction thus concluding that the theory of evolution is a flawed/illogical abstract concept and idea and it has no place in science!

The scientific method testing physical evidence and interpreting the data is only one piece of the puzzle, because you got to go through another scientific method called the law of non-contradiction applied to the information that scientist and researchers propose.

Human interpretation and distribution of information after their interpretation of how nature works must also be tested with a flawless scientific method called the law of non-contradiction.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Infinite Force wrote:
Evolution is NOT A FACT! It's a flawed abstract concept/idea that contradicts the principles on how nature/reality works.
The information that scientist and researchers put out to support this flawed abstract concept/idea is in violation of the law of non-contradiction thus concluding that the theory of evolution is a flawed/illogical abstract concept and idea and it has no place in science!
The scientific method testing physical evidence and interpreting the data is only one piece of the puzzle, because you got to go through another scientific method called the law of non-contradiction applied to the information that scientist and researchers propose.
Human interpretation and distribution of information after their interpretation of how nature works must also be tested with a flawless scientific method called the law of non-contradiction.
You are off of your meds again. You have yet to show there is any so called "law of non-contradiction" much less how it applies to evolution.

We have seen you rant and rave about this for months, yet you can never produce anything that shows it is a real concept anywhere but in your fever stricken mind.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
You are off of your meds again. You have yet to show there is any so called "law of non-contradiction" much less how it applies to evolution.
We have seen you rant and rave about this for months, yet you can never produce anything that shows it is a real concept anywhere but in your fever stricken mind.
Second, you telling me that nature contradict its self? This is where the law of non-contradiction and nature fuses as one!

Hence, the law of non-contradiction states that nature does not contradict itself and so must not the information a scientist or researcher use to describe nature!

Hence again, since nature does not contradict its self the information must not either and this is where the law of non-contradiction can be used as a scientific method for information. This is too simple not to understand!

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

CORRECTION

You telling me you don't know what a contradictory statement is?! This is what the law of non-contradiction refutes.

Second, you telling me that nature contradict its self? This is where the law of non-contradiction and nature fuses as one!

Hence, the law of non-contradiction states that nature does not contradict itself and so must not the information a scientist or researcher use to describe nature!

Hence again, since nature does not contradict its self the information must not either and this is where the law of non-contradiction can be used as a scientific method for information. This is too simple not to understand!

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
Second, you telling me that nature contradict its self? This is where the law of non-contradiction and nature fuses as one!
Hence, the law of non-contradiction states that nature does not contradict itself and so must not the information a scientist or researcher use to describe nature!
Hence again, since nature does not contradict its self the information must not either and this is where the law of non-contradiction can be used as a scientific method for information. This is too simple not to understand!
I never claimed that nature contradicts itself. And you have yet to give any evidence for your "law of non-contradiction". I assure you that even if you can properly define this law that the theory of evolution does not break that law.

Come on simpleton, if your claim is valid you can find a link for it. You are too stupid to explain it on your own.

“Universal Conscious Conscience”

Level 3

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I never claimed that nature contradicts itself. And you have yet to give any evidence for your "law of non-contradiction".
Do I really need to?! It self-explanatory on what contradictory information is when used to explain something in nature.
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
I assure you that even if you can properly define this law that the theory of evolution does not break that law.
Here is a simple explanation on what a contradictory statement is...

"Claiming that something (is and is not) on the same addressed issue or at the same time is a contradictory statement and this violates the law of non-contradiction."

Second, you are wrong the theory of evolution violates the law of non-contradiction with the biological reproductive species term it uses to explain the origin of species through descent with modification over billions of years.
Subduction Zone wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on simpleton, if your claim is valid you can find a link for it. You are too stupid to explain it on your own.
You done already lost this battle because the theory of evolution is a contradictory concept/idea so this makes you a contradictory thinking and supporting religious zealot.

I am not stupid, a matter of fact I would be careful dishing out that term towards a person like me because I can easily demonstrate that you truly are the stupid one here.

Level 9

Since: Sep 08

Everett, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
May 25, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Infinite Force wrote:
<quoted text>
Do I really need to?! It self-explanatory on what contradictory information is when used to explain something in nature.
<quoted text>[QUOTE]

Yes, you do. You seem to be misusing a simple law of logic. You have to show how the theory of evolution breaks this law. I can assure you that it does not.

[QUOTE]
Here is a simple explanation on what a contradictory statement is...
"Claiming that something (is and is not) on the same addressed issue or at the same time is a contradictory statement and this violates the law of non-contradiction."
Yes, that is the logical law, now how does it apply to evolution?
Second, you are wrong the theory of evolution violates the law of non-contradiction with the biological reproductive species term it uses to explain the origin of species through descent with modification over billions of years.
How? Be specific.
<quoted text>
You done already lost this battle because the theory of evolution is a contradictory concept/idea so this makes you a contradictory thinking and supporting religious zealot.
Once again, show how it is contradictory. An idiot claiming that the theory of evolution is contradictory is not evidence.
I am not stupid, a matter of fact I would be careful dishing out that term towards a person like me because I can easily demonstrate that you truly are the stupid one here.
So far you have shown yourself to be a total fool. I have given you a chance to redeem yourself. And I have heard that threat from other idiots too. So here is your big chance. Show HOW the theory of evolution violates the law of non-contradiction. I am willing to bet that you either misunderstand evolution, you are misapplying the law, or both.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

8 Users are viewing the Evolution Debate Forum right now

Search the Evolution Debate Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
The Universe is fine-tuned for life 51 min polymath257 496
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 2 hr DanFromSmithville 134,680
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 2 hr DanFromSmithville 113,284
Should evolution be taught in high school? (Feb '08) 4 hr MikeF 171,611
Why do half of Britons not believe in evolution? 5 hr Dogen 91
art & intelligence (Mar '11) Thu THE LONE WORKER 68
Evolution debate vote (Mar '09) Thu THE LONE WORKER 3,391
•••
•••