If by "documented" you mean "baseless assertion", yes, you did document that.<quoted text>I just documented that the junk DNA paradigm is false,
Then explain how variability does not contradict "fixed".and you continue to cling to it. DNA is a fixed code in that it's nucleotide sequences produce a fixed precisely predictable end result. That is a biologic fact.
Your idiotic childish insults only reveal your deep insecurity.
Take your time.
Only if the DNA violated the branching pattern of nested hierarchies. For example if wings on butterflies had the precisely the same DNA configuration as wings on birds. Of course in reality the genomes of birds and butterflies are consistent with nested hierarchies, therefore are still in line with evolutionary predictions.<quoted text>
"Convergent evolution" is merely a label. You haven't explained anything. Evolution predicts a branching the pattern of speciation, as Polymath has insisted. Convergence contradicts that paradigm.
What does orthology mean, Hoots? Specifically in reference to ERV's.
Before I meet the Intelligent Designer would be nice.