Darwin's diabolical delusions

Darwin's diabolical delusions

There are 100 comments on the Global Politician story from Sep 30, 2011, titled Darwin's diabolical delusions. In it, Global Politician reports that:

Liberals defend the guilty and impugn the innocent not only because they side with barbarians, but because a fair and just system of law challenges their hegemony as judges of the universe.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Global Politician.

First Prev
of 5
Next Last
MIDutch

Waterford, MI

#1 Oct 1, 2011
"If evolution is so scientific, factual and beyond all rational argument, then why do the proponents of Darwinian evolution theory systematically lie about their findings, block and defame other scientists with contrarian ideas like Intelligent Design, creationism, natural law and in the name of “academic freedom” dominate the majority of the academic journals and university professorships with a Stalinist grip?" - Ellis Washington.

Wow. Just ... wow.

So many LIES in a single paragraph. And this is from someone who is supposedly a leading (legal) light in the ultra-conservative "fundamentalist christian" community.

I suppose that his opening quote by Anne Coulter should be a clue as to how delusional he is, but he obviously doesn't understand that LYING is a sin in his religion and is likely to get him sent to Hell.

“Turning coffee into theorems”

Since: Dec 06

Trapped inside a Klein Bottle

#2 Oct 1, 2011
MIDutch wrote:
"If evolution is so scientific, factual and beyond all rational argument, then why do the proponents of Darwinian evolution theory systematically lie about their findings, block and defame other scientists with contrarian ideas like Intelligent Design, creationism, natural law and in the name of “academic freedom” dominate the majority of the academic journals and university professorships with a Stalinist grip?" - Ellis Washington.
Wow. Just ... wow.
So many LIES in a single paragraph. And this is from someone who is supposedly a leading (legal) light in the ultra-conservative "fundamentalist christian" community.
I suppose that his opening quote by Anne Coulter should be a clue as to how delusional he is, but he obviously doesn't understand that LYING is a sin in his religion and is likely to get him sent to Hell.
Ellis Washington has always failed to impress me with his opinions on anything.

“Just the facts maam”

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Earth

#3 Oct 2, 2011
After reading the article, I must say that I couldn't find more bullshit if I moved to Texas. Quotes from the noted evolutionary biologists Ann Coulter and Dan Brown really didn't help.

“Just the facts maam”

Level 2

Since: Mar 09

Earth

#4 Oct 2, 2011
No offense to Dan Brown, I like his work, but I will add that including the another author of fiction does seem apt.
Chimney

UAE

#5 Oct 3, 2011
"Sewell did not present Intelligent Design arguments, but postulated that there are certain forms of complexity which most people agree will not happen under a natural, unguided environment. Therefore, the fact that a system is "open" does not generally follow that the odds of all events happening is sufficient to make such events possible."

Damn these evil Darwinists who refuse to accept "what most people would agree" is any kind of scientific argument!
EXPLORER

Charleston, WV

#6 Oct 3, 2011
Chimney wrote:
"Sewell did not present Intelligent Design arguments, but postulated that there are certain forms of complexity which most people agree will not happen under a natural, unguided environment. Therefore, the fact that a system is "open" does not generally follow that the odds of all events happening is sufficient to make such events possible."
Damn these evil Darwinists who refuse to accept "what most people would agree" is any kind of scientific argument!
Why do you think systems basically work the same universally? Could it be that Darwin had no idea what they were doing?
Chimney

UAE

#7 Oct 3, 2011
EXPLORER wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you think systems basically work the same universally? Could it be that Darwin had no idea what they were doing?
Sorry, I cannot make head or tail of your question.
Richard

Merrylands, Australia

#8 Oct 3, 2011
"That all matter and living things in the universe, including mankind came about 13.7 billion years ago from an explosion? I’m not a scientist, but I was taught in elementary school that explosions destroy things, not create them."

Where on earth do you guys find these f...wits.

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#9 Oct 3, 2011
Serious Curmudgeon has a good rebuttal of this blog:

"We were once again awakened by blaring sirens and lights flashing on the wall display of our Retard-o-tron™. The blinking letters on the wall said WorldNetDaily.

WorldNetDaily (WND) is the flamingly creationist, absolutely execrable, moronic, and incurably crazed journalistic organ that believes in and enthusiastically promotes every conspiracy theory that ever existed. WND was an early winner of the Curmudgeon’s Buffoon Award, thus that jolly logo displayed above this post.

We were directed to a rant by Ellis Washington — the leading intellectual at WND."

<<end cut/paste....more at>>

http://sensuouscurmudgeon.wordpress.com/2011/...
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#10 Oct 3, 2011
EXPLORER wrote:
<quoted text>Why do you think systems basically work the same universally? Could it be that Darwin had no idea what they were doing?
We still couldn't give a flying fig, mikey.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#11 Oct 3, 2011
Shavin Marvin wrote:
After reading the article, I must say that I couldn't find more bullshit if I moved to Texas. Quotes from the noted evolutionary biologists Ann Coulter and Dan Brown really didn't help.
Indeed, I haven't looked yet, but it sounds like another Klinghoffer piece.

Since: Dec 06

Urbana, Illinois

#12 Oct 3, 2011
Maybe it was intended as a humor article!:)
SpaceBlues

Tomball, TX

#13 Nov 7, 2011
If only cold fusion was possible...

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#14 Apr 7, 2012

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#15 Apr 8, 2012
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
http://www.icr.org
The "Institute for Creation Research" has no intention of doing any serious, HONEST science.

If ICR stated that the sky was blue, I'd be compelled to go outside to check for myself.
The Dude

Sunderland, UK

#16 Apr 8, 2012
Wrong linky:
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
http://www.icr.org
Right linky:

http://www.icr.org/tenets/

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#17 Apr 8, 2012
The Dude wrote:
Wrong linky:
<quoted text>
Right linky:
http://www.icr.org/tenets/
better linky:

http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_t...

“Nihil curo de ista tua stulta ”

Since: May 08

Orlando

#18 Apr 8, 2012
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
From the "tenants" section of ICR that The Dude referenced (above):

"The Bible, consisting of the thirty-nine canonical books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven canonical books of the New Testament, is the divinely-inspired revelation of the Creator to man. Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological."

<<end cut/paste>>

This paragraph illustrates precisely why the ICR is not afforded any respect whatsoever as it pertains to serious science.
The Dude

Sunderland, UK

#19 Apr 8, 2012
Rusty Tin Can wrote:
<quoted text>
better linky
Except for the lies Morris (non-scientist engineer liar for Jesus who thinks moon craters were caused in a battle between angels and Satan) presents. I presented the link to the only time they want to be honest.

So speaking of honesty, why are you pretending to make a scientific case against evolution when everyone knows that your alternative is magic?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#20 Apr 9, 2012
Kong_ wrote:
<quoted text>
From the "tenants" section of ICR that The Dude referenced (above):
"The Bible, consisting of the thirty-nine canonical books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven canonical books of the New Testament, is the divinely-inspired revelation of the Creator to man. Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological."
<<end cut/paste>>
This paragraph illustrates precisely why the ICR is not afforded any respect whatsoever as it pertains to serious science.
Faulty and circular logic, using your assumption to derive the conclusion.

Darwinian evolution is just the same: FAITH

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 5
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 21 min Eagle 12 - 78,712
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 2 hr ChromiuMan 163,037
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 4 hr Eagle 12 - 32,457
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 6 hr Eagle 12 - 1,411
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 10 hr Regolith Based Li... 222,225
Mathematicians PROVED evolution IMPOSSIBLE! Sat Science 814
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... (Jan '17) Aug 5 yehoshooah adam 4,381
More from around the web