The Inheritable Magical Molecule

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#21 May 11, 2014
Chimney1 wrote:
I have no idea what Shubee's number is, but I would make a blind wager that its impact on anything meaningful is a big fat zero.
Unquestionably, "Quantifying The Magic Of The Inheritable Magical Molecule" via estimating Shubert's number is an unwelcome debate. A good comparison would be the media refusing to encourage the investigation and debate of Vincent Bugliosi's book "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder."

An objective examination of http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy shows that I was banned for supplying a good defense, not for my inflammatory opening post.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#22 May 11, 2014
Just for the record, here's my proof that ZogHasFallen has been banned from the Hypography Science Forums: http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy/ban.PNG

Note that this screenshot shows that ZogHasFallen is logged in and that the screen contains a message that says "You are not allowed to visit this community."

That's obviously a just punishment for believing that there's something peculiar about magical inheritable DNA molecules.
TurkanaBoy

Since: May 14

the Earth Clod

#23 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> Liar.
I like your senseless answers.
Because all people here will read them.
Don't exhibit your attitudes so overtly. It is embarrassing.
TurkanaBoy

Since: May 14

the Earth Clod

#24 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
Just for the record, here's my proof that ZogHasFallen has been banned from the Hypography Science Forums: http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy/ban.PNG
Note that this screenshot shows that ZogHasFallen is logged in and that the screen contains a message that says "You are not allowed to visit this community."
That's obviously a just punishment for believing that there's something peculiar about magical inheritable DNA molecules.
After having read your crap and rubbish, so be it.
Someone has to end this shit if you are not willing it to do yourself.
TurkanaBoy

Since: May 14

the Earth Clod

#25 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> Unquestionably, "Quantifying The Magic Of The Inheritable Magical Molecule" via estimating Shubert's number is an unwelcome debate. A good comparison would be the media refusing to encourage the investigation and debate of Vincent Bugliosi's book "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZDt4782gpxMXX
An objective examination of http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy shows that I was banned for supplying a good defense, not for my inflammatory opening post.
Don't overestimate your own position.
Your rubbish has been addressed here, so don't complain like a little child a lack of interest by others. But like a little spoiled child you can't stand that the whole rubbish has been refuted and debunked by several people in a row. Don't mock, get over it.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#26 May 11, 2014
TurkanaBoy wrote:
I like your senseless answers.
Because all people here will read them.
Don't exhibit your attitudes so overtly. It is embarrassing.
It should be embarrassing to you. Here's my proof that you're a liar:
http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy
I quote: "Shubert's number is well-defined. I suppose that a biologist should know some reasonable estimates of the number for at least a few species."

Please note the contradiction. You wrote: "Shubee (ahum, "Zog") also hold that the Shubert's number has been dodged by biologists,"

Where did I ever say or imply that?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#27 May 11, 2014
TurkanaBoy wrote:
Your rubbish has been addressed here, so don't complain like a little child a lack of interest by others. But like a little spoiled child you can't stand that the whole rubbish has been refuted and debunked by several people in a row. Don't mock, get over it.
Asking for some reasonable estimates of a number that should be known by informed biologists for at least a few species isn't something that can be debunked or refuted.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#28 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> Asking for some reasonable estimates of a number that should be known by informed biologists for at least a few species isn't something that can be debunked or refuted.
I looked it up. Schubert's number doesn't exist. At least not under that name. From the evidence I would conclude that Schubert's number only exists in your mind.

By the way, it is lonely and scared all by itself in the cold and the dark.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#29 May 11, 2014
DanFromSmithville wrote:
I looked it up. Schubert's number doesn't exist. At least not under that name. From the evidence I would conclude that Schubert's number only exists in your mind.
I see that superficial minds are tuned to the same channel. Not surprisingly therefore, your ignorant comment has already been answered. See my answer here: http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#30 May 11, 2014
I was wrong, I did find a definition of Schubert's number. It is calculated by multiplying the number of his arrests (U) times the number of posts on Topix (S) raised to the power of the number of Schubert's pleas for attention on Topix (uC) minus K, Schuberts constant (the number of Schubert's papers that have been published = 0) over the annual world production in vertebetrate excrement (c) plus average global temperature (r) plus average annual rainfall (a) plus average atmospheric pressure (p).

(US^uC)-K/c+r+a+p

It is a number that much as Schubert serves no useful purpose.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#31 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> I see that superficial minds are tuned to the same channel. Not surprisingly therefore, your ignorant comment has already been answered. See my answer here: http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy
So as I stated, it isn't a real number outside of your mind. It must be terrible to belief deep down that you have failed while at the same time believing you are the greatest mind of your generation. I can see it eats at you constantly. You don't even see you are running in place.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#32 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
<quoted text> I see that superficial minds are tuned to the same channel. Not surprisingly therefore, your ignorant comment has already been answered. See my answer here: http://everythingimportant.org/Buffy
It is lonely and scared by itself in the dark emptiness.

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#33 May 11, 2014
I'm wondering if Chimney1 has the courage to admit that Shubert's number exists.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#34 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
I'm wondering if Chimney1 has the courage to admit that Shubert's number exists.
That sad little fabrication is crying and alone isn't it. You must miss Chimney when he is not posting to have forgotten that he has already made statements regarding your desperate pleas for attention, fame and adulation.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/evolution/T0K...

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#35 May 11, 2014
For Chimney1 to confess that he has no idea what Shubee's number is, doesn't speak to the number's probable existence or nonexistence. It's only Chimney1's confession of ignorance.

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#36 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
For Chimney1 to confess that he has no idea what Shubee's number is, doesn't speak to the number's probable existence or nonexistence. It's only Chimney1's confession of ignorance.
It's Shubee's number now, is it. Do you get fries with that?

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#37 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
For Chimney1 to confess that he has no idea what Shubee's number is, doesn't speak to the number's probable existence or nonexistence. It's only Chimney1's confession of ignorance.
If this number exists and has significance, why don't you spell it out for us. Or is this more of a "nothing in this hand, nothing in this hand, and nothing up here" sort of a thing?

You brought it up, but why won't you bring it out into the open? Afraid you baby will die under critical, logical examination?

Since: Feb 14

Location hidden

#38 May 11, 2014
Is there anyone on this forum smart enough (or dumb enough) to explain why Shubert's number doesn't exist?
Mugwump

Glasgow, UK

#39 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
Is there anyone on this forum smart enough (or dumb enough) to explain why Shubert's number doesn't exist?
From what I have read of your recent posts, it would seem that "Shubert's number" is a phrase you have used to define the average number of fertile births across all life forms.(Your definition).

The point is what is the relevance of this number , I.e., what advantage does it have to actually know this number ?

For instance do you know mugwump's number, I.e. The average number of left handed people watching Fox News at any one period of one hour ?

“Do not bend, fold, staple or”

Level 9

Since: Jan 11

mutilate. Point down range.

#40 May 11, 2014
Zog Has-fallen wrote:
Is there anyone on this forum smart enough (or dumb enough) to explain why Shubert's number doesn't exist?
Shubert's number doesn't exist because it is mechination of Shubert's mind designed solely to support Shubert's erroneous beliefs and give him a patina of intelligence because it's pseudo-technical connotations.

It is a desperate cry for attention and relevance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Evolution Debate Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 min Aura Mytha 79,847
News It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in e... (Mar '09) 42 min Genesis Enigma 163,732
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 2 hr Eagle 12 - 32,578
News Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 3 hr Dogen 222,736
Life started in Tennessee proof. Sep 15 Science4life 1
What's your religion? Sep 8 Ateesiks 1
Science News (Sep '13) Sep 8 Ricky F 4,001
More from around the web