Taft opposes high-speed rail despite distance to proposed tracks
Taft has added its name to the list of local governments against California High-Speed Rail plans -- but unlike many of the rest, it's not because construction would disrupt local churches, businesses or, for that matter, oil fields.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Bakersfield.com.
#1 Apr 25, 2012
Perhaps Taft should rename itself as "Daft".
Add your comments below
|Ontario's high-speed rail plan not so far-fetch...||Jun '17||big promise problems||1|
|Letter writers angry about Brown's approach to ...||May '17||Solarman||4|
|Bullet train: Merced included in proposed Silic... (Apr '16)||May '17||a-citizen||2|
|Trump's infrastructure plan may hit roadblock: ...||Mar '17||Texxy the Indepen...||1|
|California high-speed rail ready to lay some track||Mar '17||Texxy the Indepen...||4|
|Texas high-speed rail plan suffers eminent doma... (Dec '16)||Dec '16||Cindy Bloom||1|
|High-speed rail route to L.A. coming in to view (Oct '16)||Oct '16||Cindy Bloom||1|
Find what you want!
Search California High-Speed Rail Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC