Oh but it can, based on intent....Man, you are really f(_)cked up..no one is 'demanding a heterosexual couple bear children'...I certainly don't want YOU to have ANY! If anything you're the one harping that reproduction be a requirement for marriage, which is totally discriminatory and asinine.
An analogy cannot have an attitude. You clearly do.
You are the one that brought up that expectation of a demand for children if they are to be a factor in marriage. I used a simple analogy to show the stupidity of that expectation.
Apparently the SCOTUS is discriminatory and asinine in your view too, they consider marriage a critical relationship of society exactly because of children.