Who still takes global warming seriou...

Who still takes global warming seriously?

There are 30922 comments on the Farmington Daily Times story from Jan 28, 2010, titled Who still takes global warming seriously?. In it, Farmington Daily Times reports that:

Despite the recent discovery of the e-mails that resulted in "Climate Gate" and the fact this has been one of the coldest and harshest winters in many years, Gov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Farmington Daily Times.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#30858 Jan 10, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be one of the dumbest because you surely don't make enough sense to be a highly paid denier.
You contradict your own advice by saying we should do what we can but it won't do any good. You imply that doing nothing is better than doing something.
Do your faucets have a variable flow? Did you ever notice that the tub fills up slower when the rate of flow is reduced? So it is with doing something about warming. Doing something will have an effect. If we reduced our pollution in the same amount that China increased theirs, then the level would stay the same, would it not? That's one way to stop increases.
You're also out of touch. Several heavily populated countries, like China, Germany, and Japan, are moving to solar and wind and that will make a difference. You need to update your prejudices.
Climate has changed before. That's an old stale argument, but the only reason that we know it's changed before is because the very same scientists who are warning us about AGW have been telling us so. So yoou believe them about past climate, but not about the present situation. You contradict yourself again.
You're a very confused little puppy.
Problem with your rant is that China isn't the only one in that area of the world that is doing it. You think North Korea is going to jump on the reduce CO2 bandwagon. India is another example. Plus, lets not forget all those third world nations who need the energy and cannot afford to invest in solar and wind because they can not produce a reliable steady supply of power.

As for which scientist have acknowledged that climate change has happened before only did so when presented with such evidence. When that evidence was used by people like me to discredit those claims of AGW. AGW itself was debunked and is no longer considered a posibile theory for climate change. In other words it fell flat and many of those "scientist" who once backed it have now admitted that it is not a possible explaination for climate change. Yet five years later you are still clinging to it when all the scientist have dropped it in the trash.

You talk about the dumbest yet and yet you still cling to something that has been proven to be junk. You talk about four or five countries out of a couple hundred that are taking action and ignore the fact for every one that has stopped several more are producing more than ever. Or to use your bath tub example, even if you shut to faucet all the way off you still have people dumping five gallon buckets into the tub.
2 manygoats

Albuquerque, NM

#30859 Jan 10, 2013
Brian_G wrote:
The media, all liberal institutes and crony capitalists believe in man made catastrophic global warming; I don't.
Only the bravest among us can admit the depths of our ignorance. You my friend, are one courageous soul.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30860 Jan 10, 2013
Not so much a brave soul when responding to "pinheadlitesout" and spacedoutblues there easy pasture respondents.
litesong

Everett, WA

#30861 Jan 10, 2013
2 manygoats wrote:
Only the bravest among us can admit the depths of our ignorance. You my friend, are one courageous soul.
My wife says, you can never have too many goats. She loves them, has raised them, & currently, as an excellent artist, is going through her 'goat artist's period'.

By the way. Did you know that 'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has a poorly earned hi skule deegreee with no upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc. He has no further science or mathematics courses, but has errors of 73 million TIMES, 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, & 3000 TIMES. He also is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30862 Jan 10, 2013
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
My wife says, you can never have too many goats. She loves them, has raised them, & currently, as an excellent artist, is going through her 'goat artist's period'.
By the way. Did you know that 'steenking piddling diddling middling mudling mudslinger brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' has a poorly earned hi skule deegreee with no upper class science, chemistry, astronomy, physics, algebra or pre-calc. He has no further science or mathematics courses, but has errors of 73 million TIMES, 1 million TIMES, 1000 TIMES, & 3000 TIMES. He also is a slimy steenking filthy vile reprobate rooting(& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AND alleged & proud threatener.
You are a low life bringing your wife into all that hate you spread daily. I bet your wife has a better relationship with her goats than you could conger up. That woman must be a Saint to deal with your mental deficiency.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#30863 Jan 10, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
Problem with your rant is that China isn't the only one in that area of the world that is doing it. You think North Korea is going to jump on the reduce CO2 bandwagon. India is another example. Plus, lets not forget all those third world nations who need the energy and cannot afford to invest in solar and wind because they can not produce a reliable steady supply of power.
As for which scientist have acknowledged that climate change has happened before only did so when presented with such evidence. When that evidence was used by people like me to discredit those claims of AGW. AGW itself was debunked and is no longer considered a posibile theory for climate change. In other words it fell flat and many of those "scientist" who once backed it have now admitted that it is not a possible explaination for climate change. Yet five years later you are still clinging to it when all the scientist have dropped it in the trash.
You talk about the dumbest yet and yet you still cling to something that has been proven to be junk. You talk about four or five countries out of a couple hundred that are taking action and ignore the fact for every one that has stopped several more are producing more than ever. Or to use your bath tub example, even if you shut to faucet all the way off you still have people dumping five gallon buckets into the tub.
You are in competition only with yourself for stupidest posts on this thread.

Are you sure you're a granma? Because you write and reason like a 10-year-old girl.

Why don't you name these "many" scientists who have abandoned AGW theory? Tell us how and when it was debunked.

And please don't come back with that bullshit "look it up yourself" like you always do. If you're so sure of yourself and if your argument is so firm and strong, then you ought to be able to present evidence of such overwhelming weight that will make all AGW acceptors on this thread stfu and never visit here again.

Do you have something you want to show us besides your usual bullshit?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30864 Jan 10, 2013
All have abandoned AGW theory the use the term in my opinion.

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#30865 Jan 11, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You are in competition only with yourself for stupidest posts on this thread.
Are you sure you're a granma? Because you write and reason like a 10-year-old girl.
Why don't you name these "many" scientists who have abandoned AGW theory? Tell us how and when it was debunked.
And please don't come back with that bullshit "look it up yourself" like you always do. If you're so sure of yourself and if your argument is so firm and strong, then you ought to be able to present evidence of such overwhelming weight that will make all AGW acceptors on this thread stfu and never visit here again.
Do you have something you want to show us besides your usual bullshit?
Like I have said before, all you seem to have left is personal attacks. That and and what you tend to term "bullshit". Notice I actually presented proof, something which you have shown a distict lack of. I also notice that your posts are becoming more childish by the day. Some have fallen to the point where a ten year old girl would find them quite babylike.

And I also see my telling you to do your own research is annoying you. It seems telling you to do your own work and find out the facts for yourself is offensive and even a tad frightening to you. Of course if you were to do your own research you just might discover that your faith is wrong. Discover that there are now thousands of peer reviewed published works in journals that declare AGW false.

The fact that you cling to AGW dispite the fact that it is rare to find a scientist that will even admit believing in it is amazing. I have heard of people who will go down with a sinking ship but you are the first who will claim it is not even as the water laps around your chin.

http://www.petitionproject.org/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nasa...

“Denying those who deny nature”

Since: Jun 07

Norfolk va

#30866 Jan 11, 2013
PHD wrote:
All have abandoned AGW theory the use the term in my opinion.
There are a few hiding at the back of a cave or under a rock like Gcaveman. Crackpots always tend to believe what they believe even in the face of evidence.

Funny thing is they use to talk about the consensus and how the majority believed.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30867 Jan 11, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
There are a few hiding at the back of a cave or under a rock like Gcaveman. Crackpots always tend to believe what they believe even in the face of evidence.
Funny thing is they use to talk about the consensus and how the majority believed.
And now its an opinion or forecast or prediction. They really really don't know.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#30868 Jan 11, 2013
tina anne wrote:
<quoted text>
... Crackpots always tend to believe what they believe even in the face of evidence.
Honey, you said a mouth full there. Sorry you don't understand the evidence.
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#30870 Jan 12, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You must be one of the dumbest because you surely don't make enough sense to be a highly paid denier.
You contradict your own advice by saying we should do what we can but it won't do any good. You imply that doing nothing is better than doing something.
Do your faucets have a variable flow? Did you ever notice that the tub fills up slower when the rate of flow is reduced? So it is with doing something about warming. Doing something will have an effect. If we reduced our pollution in the same amount that China increased theirs, then the level would stay the same, would it not? That's one way to stop increases.
You're also out of touch. Several heavily populated countries, like China, Germany, and Japan, are moving to solar and wind and that will make a difference. You need to update your prejudices.
Climate has changed before. That's an old stale argument, but the only reason that we know it's changed before is because the very same scientists who are warning us about AGW have been telling us so. So yoou believe them about past climate, but not about the present situation. You contradict yourself again.
You're a very confused little puppy.
HAHAHA...HAHAHA...What a HOOT!

There is no "faucet" that allows water to flow UP from the "tub" against the pressure from the source, IDIOT.

Ever notice that HEAT ONLY FLOWS FROM WARM TO COLD, you AGW IDIOT ?

Here is the BASIC Law of Science that covers heat flow between bodies:

“Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is NOT POSSIBLE for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/th...

Hell, any 4 year old CHILD knows that COLD OBJECTS DO NOT HEAT UP WARMER OBJECTS.

In case you AGW CULT IDIOTS don't know what your CRAP AGW "scientists" say about how CO2 in a COLD ATMOSHERE (-20 deg C) can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH SURFACE (+15 deg C), here are the FACTS DIRECTLY QUOTED FROM THE IPCC AR4 REPORT:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

If you AGW IDIOTS think that the COLD ATMOSHERE can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH then WHY DON'T YOU POST:

- Even ONE Law of Science that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect ?
- Even ONE Measurement, EVER DONE, that shows that a Colder Atmosphere can HEAT UP a Warmer Earth ?

YOU CAN'T.....BUT, WHY NOT?

ANS: In fact, every Measurement, EVER DONE, PROVES that Colder Atmosphere CANNOT HEAT UP a Warmer Earth.

Isn't that RIGHT and the TRUTH, you AGW A-HOLE?

COME ON, ADMIT IT!
----------
That's some QUACK AGW "science" you worship in your CULT.

What a HOOT!

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#30871 Jan 12, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHA...HAHAHA...What a HOOT!
There is no "faucet" that allows water to flow UP from the "tub" against the pressure from the source, IDIOT.
Ever notice that HEAT ONLY FLOWS FROM WARM TO COLD, you AGW IDIOT ?
Here is the BASIC Law of Science that covers heat flow between bodies:
“Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is NOT POSSIBLE for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/th...
Hell, any 4 year old CHILD knows that COLD OBJECTS DO NOT HEAT UP WARMER OBJECTS.
In case you AGW CULT IDIOTS don't know what your CRAP AGW "scientists" say about how CO2 in a COLD ATMOSHERE (-20 deg C) can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH SURFACE (+15 deg C), here are the FACTS DIRECTLY QUOTED FROM THE IPCC AR4 REPORT:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
If you AGW IDIOTS think that the COLD ATMOSHERE can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH then WHY DON'T YOU POST:
- Even ONE Law of Science that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect ?
- Even ONE Measurement, EVER DONE, that shows that a Colder Atmosphere can HEAT UP a Warmer Earth ?
YOU CAN'T.....BUT, WHY NOT?
ANS: In fact, every Measurement, EVER DONE, PROVES that Colder Atmosphere CANNOT HEAT UP a Warmer Earth.
Isn't that RIGHT and the TRUTH, you AGW A-HOLE?
COME ON, ADMIT IT!
----------
That's some QUACK AGW "science" you worship in your CULT.
What a HOOT!
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#30872 Jan 12, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
As I predicted and PROVED TRUE here:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...

"ALL of the AGW CULT are the same.

Like all the AGW CULT that post on Topix, FairGame-ody has these traits:

1. A room temperature IQ
2. Has a "Green Brain"....a symptom of a severe infection.
3. Always loses battles of wits because they are unarmed.
4. What they lack in intelligence, they more than make up for in stupidity.
5. Have nothing to say, but delight in saying it.
6. Have a speech impediment ... their foot.
7. Would still be a virgin except for what nature did to their mind.
8. They are not complete idiots -- some parts are missing.
9. When confronted with the Truth they use their only skill....LYING.
10. When they are confronted with their Lying...they will continue to LIE

FairGame-ody reached step #10 years ago and is stuck there FOREVER.
----------
That's all there is to the AGW'ers.

Just a bunch of wacko CULT TRASH that ALWAYS RUN FOR THE HILLS whenever I challenge them with the TRUTH.

The AGW CULT responses should be shown on Network TV so the Public LEARNS and UNDERSTANDS that these AGWers are nothing but HUMAN GARBAGE.

How PATHETIC can these IDIOTS get?"
----------
Thanks for verifying my PREDICTIONS....AGAIN!

HAHAHAHA.....What a HOOT you AGW CULTISTS ARE!

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#30873 Jan 12, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
As I predicted and PROVED TRUE here:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
"ALL of the AGW CULT are the same.
Like all the AGW CULT that post on Topix, FairGame-ody has these traits:
1. A room temperature IQ
2. Has a "Green Brain"....a symptom of a severe infection.
3. Always loses battles of wits because they are unarmed.
4. What they lack in intelligence, they more than make up for in stupidity.
5. Have nothing to say, but delight in saying it.
6. Have a speech impediment ... their foot.
7. Would still be a virgin except for what nature did to their mind.
8. They are not complete idiots -- some parts are missing.
9. When confronted with the Truth they use their only skill....LYING.
10. When they are confronted with their Lying...they will continue to LIE
FairGame-ody reached step #10 years ago and is stuck there FOREVER.
----------
That's all there is to the AGW'ers.
Just a bunch of wacko CULT TRASH that ALWAYS RUN FOR THE HILLS whenever I challenge them with the TRUTH.
The AGW CULT responses should be shown on Network TV so the Public LEARNS and UNDERSTANDS that these AGWers are nothing but HUMAN GARBAGE.
How PATHETIC can these IDIOTS get?"
----------
Thanks for verifying my PREDICTIONS....AGAIN!
HAHAHAHA.....What a HOOT you AGW CULTISTS ARE!
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
ObamaSUX

Calgary, Canada

#30874 Jan 12, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Cuckoo! Cuckoo!
You just verified your AGW CULT MEMBERSHIP AGAIN.

Keep up the RUNNING FOR THE HILLS for everybody to witness.

Thanks for your help!!
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30875 Jan 12, 2013
So nobody really really knows.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#30876 Jan 12, 2013
PHD wrote:
So nobody really really knows.
Whack a mole! Whack a mole! Whack, whack whack. Darned rascal keeps dodging,.....
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30877 Jan 12, 2013
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
I Whack my mole! Whack my mole! Whack, whack whack. Darned rascal keeps dodging,.....
Well put a harness on it. Hay you can get "pinheadlitesout, spacedoutblues and that chrome thing to hold it for you. Again too much info about what your issue is.
factologist

Huntsville, AL

#30878 Jan 12, 2013
ObamaSUX wrote:
<quoted text>
HAHAHA...HAHAHA...What a HOOT!
There is no "faucet" that allows water to flow UP from the "tub" against the pressure from the source, IDIOT.
Ever notice that HEAT ONLY FLOWS FROM WARM TO COLD, you AGW IDIOT ?
Here is the BASIC Law of Science that covers heat flow between bodies:
“Second Law of Thermodynamics: It is NOT POSSIBLE for heat to flow from a colder body to a warmer body without any work having been done to accomplish this flow. Energy will not flow spontaneously from a low temperature object to a higher temperature object.”
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/th...
Hell, any 4 year old CHILD knows that COLD OBJECTS DO NOT HEAT UP WARMER OBJECTS.
In case you AGW CULT IDIOTS don't know what your CRAP AGW "scientists" say about how CO2 in a COLD ATMOSHERE (-20 deg C) can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH SURFACE (+15 deg C), here are the FACTS DIRECTLY QUOTED FROM THE IPCC AR4 REPORT:
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
If you AGW IDIOTS think that the COLD ATMOSHERE can HEAT-UP a WARMER EARTH then WHY DON'T YOU POST:
- Even ONE Law of Science that supports the Fantasy "Greenhouse Effect ?
- Even ONE Measurement, EVER DONE, that shows that a Colder Atmosphere can HEAT UP a Warmer Earth ?
YOU CAN'T.....BUT, WHY NOT?
ANS: In fact, every Measurement, EVER DONE, PROVES that Colder Atmosphere CANNOT HEAT UP a Warmer Earth.
Isn't that RIGHT and the TRUTH, you AGW A-HOLE?
COME ON, ADMIT IT!
----------
That's some QUACK AGW "science" you worship in your CULT.
What a HOOT!
One thing you have proven for sure is that an idiot by any other name is still an idiot.

By the way, idiot,We all know the Earth is heated by the Sun and to a small extent, it's warm interior. No AGW scientist I am aware of has said or even implied the Earth is heated by the atmosphere. They all know, as do most of the rest of us, that the Earth's atmosphere acts as a blanket and helps to keep the Earth from loosing heat to space. If you know of any "AGW scientist that believes otherwise, share their name with the rest of us.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Activism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News We won't make laws to promote gay rights - Speaker 15 hr Ex Senator Santpo... 4
News Same-sex Winnipeg couple won't quit fight to ha... Feb 18 Gay davey 4
News Records: Washington officials gave activist's i... Feb 17 Genese 1
News Records: Washington officials gave activist's i... Feb 17 spytheweb 2
News Records: Washington officials gave activist's i... Feb 17 tomin cali 1
News A well-deserved victory Feb 17 Green Party better 1
News Money is the driving force (Sep '10) Feb 14 Follow The Money 11
More from around the web