Who still takes global warming seriou...

Who still takes global warming seriously?

There are 30923 comments on the Farmington Daily Times story from Jan 28, 2010, titled Who still takes global warming seriously?. In it, Farmington Daily Times reports that:

Despite the recent discovery of the e-mails that resulted in "Climate Gate" and the fact this has been one of the coldest and harshest winters in many years, Gov.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Farmington Daily Times.

gcaveman1

Glen Ellyn, IL

#30836 Dec 17, 2012
(crickets chirping)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#30837 Dec 17, 2012
gcaveman1 wrote:
(crickets chirping)
But as the climate warms, their chirping becomes lower in pitch....
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30838 Dec 17, 2012
And as the climate cools their chirping becomes slower.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#30839 Dec 20, 2012
PHD wrote:
And as the climate cools their chirping becomes slower.
PHD has been busy! ;<D

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30840 Dec 21, 2012
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
PHD has been busy! ;<D
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Yes it's very difficult to educate the likes of you.
litesong

Everett, WA

#30841 Dec 24, 2012
phdudd wrote:
Yes it's very difficult to educate the likes of you.
Specially when phdudd had difficulty educating himself with the few & unlikely classes he took.
munum

Masontown, PA

#30842 Dec 25, 2012
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30843 Dec 25, 2012
pinheadlitesout wrote:
<quoted text>
Specially when phdudd had difficulty educating himself with the few & unlikely classes he took.
And the only class you attended is the cut and paste useless babble covered with puppy poop class. And one questions that you could pass that class.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#30844 Dec 30, 2012
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>
PHD has been busy! ;<D
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Correction: B-U-S-I-E-R.

Check it out sometimes. ph'd would attack you again and again.

dirt and tina must miss ph'd.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30845 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Correction: B-U-S-I-E-R.
Check it out sometimes. ph'd would attack you again and again.
dirt and tina must miss ph'd.
So you can't explain.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#30846 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain.
Su, you made a big mistake.

Also, responder.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30847 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Su, you made a big mistake.
Also, responder.
So you can't explain.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#30848 Dec 30, 2012
PHD wrote:
<quoted text>So you can't explain.
LOL.

Troll. Ignored.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30849 Dec 30, 2012
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>LOL.
Troll. Ignored.
So you can't explain.

“CO2 is Gaseous Love”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#30851 Dec 30, 2012
litesong wrote:
We'll let 'brian_g stumble butt dumpster diver' live in the middle of the worst man-made environmental disasters ever created.
Did I miss your birthday?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30852 Jan 7, 2013
"pinheadlitesout" was hatched it dosen't have a birthday.
recycle

Albuquerque, NM

#30853 Jan 7, 2013
gcaveman1 wrote:
It’s pretty easy to show that global temperatures are rising, or that spring is arriving earlier than it once did, but since climate has changed plenty of times in the past, that alone doesn’t prove anything. Tying climate change to human greenhouse-gas emissions — an area known as detection and attribution, or fingerprinting — is a lot harder.
That’s what makes a new study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences so important. Using state-of-the-art climate models, Ben Santer of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and 21 colleagues have found what they call “some of the clearest evidence to date of a discernible influence on atmospheric temperature.”
<><><>< ><><><> <><><>< >
And on this thread, as the evidence become overwhelming and only the dumbest or most highly paid deniers dare to comment, we hear...
(crickets chirping)
And, as the world 'turns'...no matter what we in America do to 'save the planet' so to speak...all goes unheeded in the most populace countries...so, even if we recycle, cut smog, if and unless every other country on the planet does the same, our efforts are for naught. The planet spins, the pollution spins with it. Do what you can. Bottom line...guilt the American populace all you want, but if and until every country on this planet does the same, our efforts are for naught. And, as this planet has proven in the past, there will be 'highs and lows' in the climate. That, my friends you can't change. It's a given. So, do what you can to slow the inevitable, but, given the planet's history, there's not much you'll do to permanently change it. You can do what you can, but you'll never change the inevitable.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#30854 Jan 8, 2013
Until you change the money distribution everything will remain the same.
gcaveman1

Bay Springs, MS

#30855 Jan 8, 2013
recycle wrote:
<quoted text>
And, as the world 'turns'...no matter what we in America do to 'save the planet' so to speak...all goes unheeded in the most populace countries...so, even if we recycle, cut smog, if and unless every other country on the planet does the same, our efforts are for naught. The planet spins, the pollution spins with it. Do what you can. Bottom line...guilt the American populace all you want, but if and until every country on this planet does the same, our efforts are for naught. And, as this planet has proven in the past, there will be 'highs and lows' in the climate. That, my friends you can't change. It's a given. So, do what you can to slow the inevitable, but, given the planet's history, there's not much you'll do to permanently change it. You can do what you can, but you'll never change the inevitable.
You must be one of the dumbest because you surely don't make enough sense to be a highly paid denier.

You contradict your own advice by saying we should do what we can but it won't do any good. You imply that doing nothing is better than doing something.

Do your faucets have a variable flow? Did you ever notice that the tub fills up slower when the rate of flow is reduced? So it is with doing something about warming. Doing something will have an effect. If we reduced our pollution in the same amount that China increased theirs, then the level would stay the same, would it not? That's one way to stop increases.

You're also out of touch. Several heavily populated countries, like China, Germany, and Japan, are moving to solar and wind and that will make a difference. You need to update your prejudices.

Climate has changed before. That's an old stale argument, but the only reason that we know it's changed before is because the very same scientists who are warning us about AGW have been telling us so. So yoou believe them about past climate, but not about the present situation. You contradict yourself again.

You're a very confused little puppy.
Ninthman

“Obama Shames the USA”

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#30856 Jan 8, 2013
It's now called "Benghazi Warming"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Activism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News GOP members of Congress meet with protests at t... 7 hr CodeTalker 5
News Staten Islander: "I'm marching for unity, respe... 18 hr Kermit the Frog Q... 10
News Once again, the ACLU takes its place on the fro... Tue AISHA 9
News Pope Francis Mon USA-1 2
News Saturday protest at Vacaville Planned Parenthood Mon Maximus Vacavillius 4
News Is Russia Decriminalizing Domestic Violence? Feb 16 beatlesinafog 7
News A Hungarian village declared a wara on Muslim i... Feb 14 Kosovo is Serbia 1
More from around the web