Activist: "Abortion Threatens Black A...

Activist: "Abortion Threatens Black America's Future"

There are 6011 comments on the Booker Rising story from Sep 24, 2012, titled Activist: "Abortion Threatens Black America's Future". In it, Booker Rising reports that:

The From Catholic Online : "Adding to the argument that abortion threatens one sector of American society over others, Catherine Davis, president of The Restoration Project, pointed out to the great racial disparity of women currently getting abortions." The article continues: "Davis said that according to the Centers for Disease Control, ... (more)

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Booker Rising.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1383 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
R v W made it clear that the states could determine that issue and they are getting more and more conservative.
Wrong. Your ignorance is showing again. RvW determined that the states could set Some limits after the first trimester, but that even then they cannot make it entirely illegal.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#1384 Mar 29, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Your ignorance is showing again. RvW determined that the states could set Some limits after the first trimester, but that even then they cannot make it entirely illegal.
What do you think "that issue" meant? Why don't you go back and read a couple of posts before you comment so that your respomse looks more intelligent?

The states do determine time restrictions if any.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1386 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you think "that issue" meant? Why don't you go back and read a couple of posts before you comment so that your respomse looks more intelligent?
The states do determine time restrictions if any.
I know what the conversation is about, Witless. You're still wrong. They can only decide time restrictions under certain circumstances.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#1387 Mar 29, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
I know what the conversation is about, Witless. You're still wrong. They can only decide time restrictions under certain circumstances.
I'm glad you think it is a done deal and changes are not comming.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5750058...

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1388 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you think it is a done deal and changes are not comming.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5750058...
The giddy excitement you experience in restricting abortion while disregarding all concern for the woman/girl hopefully lands on your doorstep and not those of us who actually care for the lives and health of women/girls. Poetic justice.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#1389 Mar 29, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
The giddy excitement you experience in restricting abortion while disregarding all concern for the woman/girl hopefully lands on your doorstep and not those of us who actually care for the lives and health of women/girls. Poetic justice.
My best to you too.
Do you think there aren't any babies in my family?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#1390 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm glad you think it is a done deal and changes are not comming.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-5750058...
It's not my fault you fail to understand how these things work.

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1391 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
My best to you too.
Do you think there aren't any babies in my family?
I meant what I said. I hope what you wish for lands on your doorstep and not on mine. I actually love my daughter and do not consider her a sacrificial womb to the male fetus god.
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#1392 Mar 29, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
I meant what I said. I hope what you wish for lands on your doorstep and not on mine. I actually love my daughter and do not consider her a sacrificial womb to the male fetus god.
What are you so angry about?

Abortion is legal so that can't be your problem.
Truthism

United States

#1393 Mar 29, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well of course you are against abortion in every case as you consider woman/girls subhuman holding them hostage to their own bodies and medical conditions without a choice. PERFECT!
You are pro forced gestation considering rape, thank you for admitting. Limits to a woman/girls freedom including medical decisions is the way of misogyny. Just as long as nothing tampers with your ass you are fine RIGHT pal??? Keep a close eye on on the "femanazi's" Rush Limpballs. We are not going away and joyfully will beat you bloody in the court system. We know and understand freedom and how you wish to limit it regarding women/girls.
YOU have been played as a pawn more than likely by phallic worshipping religions in your limited understanding of freedom and liberty. Religion along with its books places women in second class citizenry and confines them to brood mare. Now take that you chauvinist pig and prepare to be stomped on in the courts. If the courts decide to roll with the chauvinist pigs then prepare to romance your right hand as your only alternative for a sex partner excluding your already engaged favorite barn animal.
I'm all about individual freedom, whether male or female - even to the point of my wanting all drugs legalized for personal use - prostitution legalized; gambling legalized; among other such things the individual chooses to do, as long as they do not force it on anyone else against their will...

... but the line is drawn when that "freedom" starts infringing upon another individuals life and freedom as well: the baby in the females' womb.

Too bad your IQ must be so low, you didn't even comprehend that, feminazi, pro-murder of innocent babies.

I wonder, if some person came up and punched you in the stomach as your baby was in your womb, and intentionally sought to and did kill your baby in your womb... would you seek murder charges brought against them? Or merely "destruction of personal property and assault and battery" charges?

We all know the REAL answer to this and it proves my point, hands down.

Especially BEFORE you were brainwashed by the murderous criminal elites' definition of "fetus" supposedly not being "human" yet...

If all clueless pro-baby-murderers were in the womb and, imagining they had the ability to understand the female wanting to murder ("abort") them, what would they think/say then?

Would you respect that female then?

What an abomination.

Pro-lifers need to get up and protest this disgusting act, en masse! All across the country!

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1394 Mar 29, 2013
Truthism wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm all about individual freedom, whether male or female - even to the point of my wanting all drugs legalized for personal use - prostitution legalized; gambling legalized; among other such things the individual chooses to do, as long as they do not force it on anyone else against their will...
... but the line is drawn when that "freedom" starts infringing upon another individuals life and freedom as well: the baby in the females' womb.
Too bad your IQ must be so low, you didn't even comprehend that, feminazi, pro-murder of innocent babies.
I wonder, if some person came up and punched you in the stomach as your baby was in your womb, and intentionally sought to and did kill your baby in your womb... would you seek murder charges brought against them? Or merely "destruction of personal property and assault and battery" charges?
We all know the REAL answer to this and it proves my point, hands down.
Especially BEFORE you were brainwashed by the murderous criminal elites' definition of "fetus" supposedly not being "human" yet...
If all clueless pro-baby-murderers were in the womb and, imagining they had the ability to understand the female wanting to murder ("abort") them, what would they think/say then?
Would you respect that female then?
What an abomination.
Pro-lifers need to get up and protest this disgusting act, en masse! All across the country!
You dare to speak of IQ ya fcking idiot?

The person injured in the above scenario would be the woman/girl, the assault was committed on her and HER decision to carry a pregnancy. AND then you write this being the LOW IQ person that you are:

""... but the line is drawn when that "freedom" starts infringing upon another individuals life and freedom as well: the baby in the females' womb.""

FEMALES WOMB...GOT THAT YA FREAK????? FEMALES WOMB....repeat 100 fcking times and maybe it will sink in...SHE OWNS HER WOMB and YOU and YOUR ILK of religious fcking morons wish to infringe on HER INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to HER BODY AND WELL BEING!!!!!!!!!!

You are a knuckle dragging embarrassment of a man. Quite comfortable not having to deal with an unwanted pregnancy but feel entitled to tell those who actually can get pregnant what they should be doing. You can take your personal comfort idea of freedom and shove it straight up your enormous azz. Femanazi is RIGHT when it comes to lowlife misogynistic freaks like you.....bring it on dickwit!!!!!!!!!!
Ink

Philadelphia, PA

#1395 Mar 29, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
You dare to speak of IQ ya fcking idiot?
The person injured in the above scenario would be the woman/girl, the assault was committed on her and HER decision to carry a pregnancy. AND then you write this being the LOW IQ person that you are:
""... but the line is drawn when that "freedom" starts infringing upon another individuals life and freedom as well: the baby in the females' womb.""
FEMALES WOMB...GOT THAT YA FREAK????? FEMALES WOMB....repeat 100 fcking times and maybe it will sink in...SHE OWNS HER WOMB and YOU and YOUR ILK of religious fcking morons wish to infringe on HER INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to HER BODY AND WELL BEING!!!!!!!!!!
You are a knuckle dragging embarrassment of a man. Quite comfortable not having to deal with an unwanted pregnancy but feel entitled to tell those who actually can get pregnant what they should be doing. You can take your personal comfort idea of freedom and shove it straight up your enormous azz. Femanazi is RIGHT when it comes to lowlife misogynistic freaks like you.....bring it on dickwit!!!!!!!!!!
Anger issues.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#1396 Mar 29, 2013
This has nothing to do with your precious bodily fluids, whacko.

That womb belongs to the woman, not you. You have no say in her decisions, and she loses no rights just because her medical state changes.
Truthism wrote:
I've seen the criminals in the government and so-called "medical" industry get away with allowing corporations to put chemicals in and on our foods, drinks, among many other things. They legalize these poisons! I've seen the pharmaceutical industry legalize all of these synthetic poisonous abominations left and right and sell them for big bucks on a daily basis, even though they're riskier to your body than marijuana will every be in a billion lifetimes, yet the criminal elite make marijuana illegal in most States...
... yet we're supposed to TRUST these disgusting, criminal pieces of trash when they claim that baby forming in a mothers womb is "not human" until a "certain stage" which they (proven criminal trash) can only let us know?
Get the ____ out of here.
I don't trust them and never will.
"Abortion" (baby murder) should be ILLEGAL across the board, no matter what. Don't want it? Give it up for adoption and then you still must financially provide for it if no one else will take the baby in the meantime.
I swear, you clueless people will back these criminals if they ever legalize MURDER of humans already born.
There must be logical limits to things like this and the criminal elite have sneaked their way in like sly little foxes, brainwashed the simpleton feminazis among us, making them think this is your "right" and anyone who speaks out against it is a "religious misogynist."
You've been played like a pawn, just like the minorities who think all Republicans are racist, simply because Democrats say so and brainwash you to believe this in every way.

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1397 Mar 29, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Anger issues.
That is exactly what NonTruthism has.

Guess you religious anti choice anti woman zealots expect us "femanazis" to sit back and act like the docile dolts you hang with? Guess again.
Truthism

United States

#1398 Mar 29, 2013
Morgana 9 wrote:
<quoted text>
You dare to speak of IQ ya fcking idiot?
The person injured in the above scenario would be the woman/girl, the assault was committed on her and HER decision to carry a pregnancy. AND then you write this being the LOW IQ person that you are:
""... but the line is drawn when that "freedom" starts infringing upon another individuals life and freedom as well: the baby in the females' womb.""
FEMALES WOMB...GOT THAT YA FREAK????? FEMALES WOMB....repeat 100 fcking times and maybe it will sink in...SHE OWNS HER WOMB and YOU and YOUR ILK of religious fcking morons wish to infringe on HER INDIVIDUAL RIGHT to HER BODY AND WELL BEING!!!!!!!!!!
You are a knuckle dragging embarrassment of a man. Quite comfortable not having to deal with an unwanted pregnancy but feel entitled to tell those who actually can get pregnant what they should be doing. You can take your personal comfort idea of freedom and shove it straight up your enormous azz. Femanazi is RIGHT when it comes to lowlife misogynistic freaks like you.....bring it on dickwit!!!!!!!!!!
I own my house, but it still doesn't give me a 'right' to murder anyone within that house at will.

My children are made of the genes from my wife and I, yet I still shouldn't say "Ah, that means this child is our property, so we have a right to DESTROY this property whenever we want!"

There must be a limit drawn and your mindset only sets up the limit to draw ever closer to the justification of cold blooded murder of people outside of the womb one day, maybe not today, but one day... maybe in 500 years, but one day...

I don't like letting these criminals even an inch inside the door because they've proven to use and abuse that inch, eventually to gain a mile and then it's all over with. Sadly, you cannot see that far in your mind.
Truthism

United States

#1399 Mar 29, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
This has nothing to do with your precious bodily fluids, whacko.
That womb belongs to the woman, not you. You have no say in her decisions, and she loses no rights just because her medical state changes.
<quoted text>
I see.

So if you're in my house, I can just bind you up and make you my slave then, if I so chose to do so?

NOT! Didn't think so.

There are logical limits to freedoms and rights. The limit is drawn around the equal rights [to life] of others, including BABIES IN THE WOMB!

Ironic how your kind say I'm being selfish and not thinking of the rights of women, yet you're the ones being selfish and not thinking of the rights of that innocent baby in the womb!

Projection 101.
Truthism

United States

#1400 Mar 29, 2013
By the way, I know many females who are staunchly pro-life as I am. What've you got to say to them, concerning your little put-downs about the male anatomy, as if I only speak against abortion since I'm male?

How silly. Tell that to the millions of pro-life females out there, silly girl. What are they? Once-males who got sex changes? Ha!:-)

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#1401 Mar 29, 2013
Truthism wrote:
<quoted text>
I own my house, but it still doesn't give me a 'right' to murder anyone within that house at will.
My children are made of the genes from my wife and I, yet I still shouldn't say "Ah, that means this child is our property, so we have a right to DESTROY this property whenever we want!"
There must be a limit drawn and your mindset only sets up the limit to draw ever closer to the justification of cold blooded murder of people outside of the womb one day, maybe not today, but one day... maybe in 500 years, but one day...
I don't like letting these criminals even an inch inside the door because they've proven to use and abuse that inch, eventually to gain a mile and then it's all over with. Sadly, you cannot see that far in your mind.
YOU might own a house, YOU DO NOT OWN another PERSON, and OBVIOUSLY you are incapable of drawing a line between PROPERTY and a woman/girl and HER BODY YA FCKING MORON.

Your paranoia does not impress ME, you can cry fowl all you like in defense of your control issues.

YOUR children are the result of a WILLING FEMALE, other than that you have NOTHING unless you can handle the load all yourself. You are incapable and that is what drives you INSANE!! You all it ALL to a woman and YOU cannot admit it!! Tell your male phallic worshiping how bad you fell about that fact.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#1402 Mar 29, 2013
No, because I'n a BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN and thus have constitutional rights. Furthermore, you can evict me at any time--just like a woman can evict a fetus. I can't force you to support me without your consent--just like woman doesn't have to gestate against her will.

Fetuses HAVE no rights.
Truthism wrote:
<quoted text>
I see.
So if you're in my house, I can just bind you up and make you my slave then, if I so chose to do so?
NOT! Didn't think so.
There are logical limits to freedoms and rights. The limit is drawn around the equal rights [to life] of others, including BABIES IN THE WOMB!
Ironic how your kind say I'm being selfish and not thinking of the rights of women, yet you're the ones being selfish and not thinking of the rights of that innocent baby in the womb!
Projection 101.

“Headline already in use”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#1403 Mar 30, 2013
Abortion takes ALL rights from its innocent unborn victims.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Abortion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 7 hr Blue November 311,629
News Democrats seek repeal of ban on federal funding... Sun cpeter1313 138
News I stand outside abortion clinics, but I'm no pr... Sun cpeter1313 19
News Anti-abortion group sues city, wants to move be... Aug 27 Susanm 4
News Planned Parenthood Trying to Rebrand Itself As ... Aug 27 cpeter1313 1
News Planned Parenthood joins $500k effort to help C... Aug 27 Susanm 1
Miss Jenny Abortion Procedure (Apr '14) Aug 26 Kira 67
More from around the web