Anti-Abortion Bill Wants to Warn Women About Non-Existent Cancer Risk. Why Stop There?
The bill is likely designed to be unconstitutional under current law because it imposes an undue burden on women who seek abortions.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Plunderbund.
#1 Jun 15, 2013
Add your comments below
|US court rules Arkansas can block Planned Paren...||25 min||WelbyMD||7|
|Ousted chief justice makes runoff in Alabama Se...||35 min||anonymous||3|
|Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08)||2 hr||Junket||316,288|
|My girlfriend wants an abortion And I dont (Apr '11)||11 hr||cpeter1313||60|
|Texas set to restrict insurance coverage for ab...||Aug 14||waco1909||10|
|Pro life for women||Aug 13||Estelle||64|
|Democrats differ: Should party back anti-aborti...||Aug 6||the X files||2|
Find what you want!
Search Abortion Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC