Anti-Abortion Bill Wants to Warn Women About Non-Existent Cancer Risk. Why Stop There?
The bill is likely designed to be unconstitutional under current law because it imposes an undue burden on women who seek abortions.Full Story
#1 Jun 15, 2013
Add your comments below
|Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08)||10 hr||STO||305,851|
|Jessa Duggar Compares Abortion to the Holocaust...||15 hr||Mychihuahuawillbite||4|
|I tried to protect my grandchildren from the vi...||Tue||godless by choice||1|
|Planned Parenthood blasts Ernst in new ad||Tue||liberals are heros||14|
|Priest Speaks Up For Planned Parenthood: 'Peopl...||Tue||cancer suxs||4|
|Decode pro-abortion talking points: Choicespeak...||Sep 29||Deborah||1|
|Activist: "Abortion Threatens Black America's F... (Sep '12)||Sep 27||cpeter1313||5,367|
Find what you want!
Search Abortion Forum Now