Federal Judge Delays North Dakota Abo...

Federal Judge Delays North Dakota Abortion Law

There are 6 comments on the KSTP story from Jul 22, 2013, titled Federal Judge Delays North Dakota Abortion Law. In it, KSTP reports that:

A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a new North Dakota law that bans abortion when a fatal heartbeat is detected - as early as six weeks into pregnancy, calling the law "clearly invalid and unconstitutional."

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KSTP.

Lance Winslow

San Jose, CA

#1 Jul 22, 2013
Wisconsin, Kansas, New Mexico, Arizona, North Dakota...Texas. Durn that pesky Constitution gettin' in the way of their agendas!
Sheik Yerbouti

Doylestown, PA

#2 Jul 22, 2013
Just another case of fundietards and vatican cult members trying to force their medieval beliefs on normal educated people! Too bad the Constitutions says otherwise losers!
chisholm

Columbus, OH

#4 Jul 23, 2013
Maddow had a wonderful segment on last night where she went down the list of states where right wingers had imposed unConstitutional anti-choice laws and where judges subsequently struck them down.

It's part of the Republican strategy of governance these days not just to do nothing...that would be too easy...but to actually WASTE huge amounts of time and money in trying to do things they know can't be done, like overturning Roe v. Wade or Obamacare.

The party of no...no brains, that is.
chisholm

Columbus, OH

#5 Jul 23, 2013
Eighthman wrote:
It should read a FETAL heartbeat. Not Fatal.
Who's the democrat morons that TRIES to write this propaganda????
Are they hired out of India or What?
Or are they still in the 5th grade?
Hilarious...you probably don't see why though, do you?:)
Ravianna

Lincoln City, OR

#6 Jul 23, 2013
I've never understood how something that isn't in the Constitution and something that the people who wrote the Constitution would be against could be unconstitutional.
chisholm

Columbus, OH

#7 Jul 23, 2013
Ravianna wrote:
I've never understood how something that isn't in the Constitution and something that the people who wrote the Constitution would be against could be unconstitutional.
You've never understood how somehting that isn't in the Constitution could be unConstitutional? Seriously? Do you think that every single act of human beings, or every possible event or action is covered by that document?

The Roe v. Wade decision was based on a right of privacy that I'm sure the founders would've understood perfectly.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Abortion Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08) 9 min Prune 345,740
My girlfriend wants an abortion And I dont (Apr '11) 13 hr K lynn 69
News Will abortion become illegal in the United States? Sun puppy power 1 7
News Texas abortion clinics sue to undo laws dating ... Jun 16 Choicerocks 2
News How One New York Group is Defending Abortion Ri... Jun 16 Margaret Sanger 1
News Americans' Support For Abortion Rights Wanes As... Jun 13 puppy power 1 1
Abortion: Divine punishment Jun 12 Uncle Sam 5