Major Newspapers Refuse 'Controversial' Pro-Life Ad

Jul 9, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: WHP-AM Harrisburg

Several major U.S. newspapers reportedly refused to run a pro-life ad showing what a 20 to 24-week-old baby looks like in a woman's womb.

Comments
1 - 3 of 3 Comments Last updated Jul 25, 2013
Deborah

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Showing an accurate representation of a 20-week baby -- http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mli... -- was "too controversial"?

Only to "journalists" who are shills for the abortion industry.

Since: Jun 08

Atrisco Village

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jul 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Deborah wrote:
Showing an accurate representation of a 20-week baby -- http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mli... -- was "too controversial"?
Only to "journalists" who are shills for the abortion industry.
Journalists don't decide what advertising goes into a publication.
LineDazzle

Hawarden, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jul 25, 2013
 
I'm sure Pro Abortion Pro Murder Journalists are told what photos they are taking, so I'm sure they do their best to make it look like the babies are not real.

Elise in burque, I'm largelanguage btw, butch freak!

It's obvious you hate masculinity, freak of nature!
Most women are highly attracted to masculinity, or at least the amount of natural women there are now days that prefer masculine men.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••