Major Newspapers Refuse 'Controversial' Pro-Life Ad
Several major U.S. newspapers reportedly refused to run a pro-life ad showing what a 20 to 24-week-old baby looks like in a woman's womb.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at WHP-AM Harrisburg.
#1 Jul 11, 2013
Showing an accurate representation of a 20-week baby -- http://content.clearchannel.com/cc-common/mli... -- was "too controversial"?
Only to "journalists" who are shills for the abortion industry.
Since: Jun 08
#2 Jul 17, 2013
Journalists don't decide what advertising goes into a publication.
#3 Jul 25, 2013
I'm sure Pro Abortion Pro Murder Journalists are told what photos they are taking, so I'm sure they do their best to make it look like the babies are not real.
Elise in burque, I'm largelanguage btw, butch freak!
It's obvious you hate masculinity, freak of nature!
Most women are highly attracted to masculinity, or at least the amount of natural women there are now days that prefer masculine men.
Add your comments below
|Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision (Jan '08)||16 min||June VanDerMark||325,987|
|Planned Parenthood Sells Hormone Poisoning, Gen...||23 hr||cpeter1313||1|
|Casada applauds court decision to uphold Amendm...||Sun||Typical||19|
|Pro life for women||Jan 12||June VanDerMark||84|
|EMILY's List Endorses Minnesota's Tina Smith||Jan 4||He Named Me Black...||3|
|Iowa Planned Parenthood Clinic to Shut-Down fro...||Dec 29||C Kersey||1|
|Anti-vaxxers claim vaccines made from abortions||Dec 29||Aussie Aussie Aussie||2|
Find what you want!
Search Abortion Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC