What the 2012 election taught us

What the 2012 election taught us

There are 10313 comments on the The Washington Post story from Nov 6, 2012, titled What the 2012 election taught us. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

We've been scouring the data for clues as to what we should learn from what happened tonight as President Obama relatively easily claimed a second term.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Stoneman

Boise, ID

#7706 Feb 2, 2013
Al "Sex Poodle" Gore goes on Letterman, etc. to sell his worthless book. The fawning leftist show hosts delicately ask about how such a brilliant priest of the Global Warming Religion can justify such an apparent hypocrisy, selling his kooky Socialist/Democrat propaganda TV station to an oil-based country. How can he do this? Isn't oil (and rich, white, bald Conservative men) EVIL?

His answer: "I disagree with the assessment". End of discussion.

Oh. Okay. That should do it.

Explains how leftists can consider Princess Hillary to be a viable Secretary of State, responsible for defending the US in foriegn affairs, while remaining married to a man that humiliated her repeatedly by having his genitalia sucked and ejaculating in the face of a 20-year-old employee.

Leftists are clueless.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7708 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>I understand it very well, he violated
FIFTH AMENDMENT.

You understand nothing.

You have a rant and you aren't going to allow facts to stand in your way.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7709 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>why do you think packing the US Supreme Court is so necessary to the Right & the Left which was even needed for FDR because the SCOTUS kept ruling
... never interrupt a tea bagger on a rant...

Tell us about the black UN hellycopters, PA!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7710 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>all your trying to is justify the Failed SCOTUS liberal thinking that has failed US Society.
In Haynes v. U.S.(1968),
FIFTH AMENDMENT.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7711 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1968 ruled in Haynes v. United States that felons and others who are prohibited from possessing guns could not be forced to incriminate themselves through registration.
Fifth Amendment.

This did not give felons license to own guns.

You stupid dolt.

Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968 corrected the "loophole" in the Haynes case, and Title II was subsequently UPHELD by SCOTUS in the FREED case.

I've reminded you of this three times.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7712 Feb 2, 2013
Stoneman wrote:
Al "Sex Poodle" Gore goes on Letterman, etc. to sell his worthless book.
Gore will make more on his "worthless" book than you will make in your entire worthless life.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7713 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
FIFTH AMENDMENT.
You understand nothing.
You have a rant and you aren't going to allow facts to stand in your way.
facts stand it was about Gun Registration of the rights of a Convict vs law abiding citizen which is the moderen Liberals are the reason why today the convicts & the criminals are walking the street with guns especially in chicago and by the Liberals on the SCOTUS using 5th admendment was a copout since the Liberals as FDR call them were responsible for the National Firearms Act of 1934 and made more sense than the liberals on the SCOTUS in 1968 besides convicts & criminals cant be forced to register their assault weapons thanks to the liberals.

now New York State Ban on assault rifles and clips is in trouble because of the Liberals descision and language used in Haynes vs United States.

Lawsuit targets New York's post-Sandy Hook gun law

"A number of constitutional rights were just tossed aside here," Tresmond said on Wednesday.

Under the law, the failure to register a gun is a class E felony. The suit claims that the provision violates the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, because it could force a gun owner who registers late to effectively admit to committing a crime.

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1968 ruled in Haynes v. United States that felons and others who are prohibited from possessing guns could not be forced to incriminate themselves through registration.

Tresmond said the law also violates the Fifth Amendment's ban on the taking of private property by the government. The law requires people who own high-capacity magazines to either sell them or surrender them to the state.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/30/us-...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7714 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fifth Amendment.
This did not give felons license to own guns.
You stupid dolt.
Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968 corrected the "loophole" in the Haynes case, and Title II was subsequently UPHELD by SCOTUS in the FREED case.
I've reminded you of this three times.
yes it did stupid dolt read the case of Haynes vs United States and yes the loophole & the legal precedent established in Haynes vs United States still stands and is law of the land for whole US.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7715 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
... never interrupt a tea bagger on a rant...
Tell us about the black UN hellycopters, PA!
nope not a tea bagger on a rant, a registered Democrat.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7716 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
facts stand it was about Gun Registration of the rights
Fifth Amendment.

That is what the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES says.

PS: as I have pointed out to you five times: the "loophole" was fixed in the revision in 1968.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7717 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>yes it did stupid dolt read the case of Haynes vs United States and yes the loophole & the legal precedent established in Haynes vs United States still stands and is law of the land for whole US.
You stupid dolt:

Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968.

The whole of the US.

PS: Upheld, SCOTUS.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7718 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
nope not a tea bagger on a rant, a registered Democrat.
You can register anyway you like.

There is no test, tea bagger.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7719 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
the National Firearms Act of 1934 ...
Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7720 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
Lawsuit targets New York's post-Sandy Hook gun law
Anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason.

Do you think the speed limit violates your constitutional rights to drive at 150 MPH?

File a suit.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7721 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
The U.S. Supreme Court in 1968 ruled in Haynes v. United States that felons and others who are prohibited from possessing guns could not be forced to incriminate themselves through registration.
Felons are not forced to incriminate themselves anymore by registering.

Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968.

Even though you are a felon, honey, you can register your stolen hand gun.

Call me if you have any problems and I'll represent you for free...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7722 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
Tresmond said the law also violates the Fifth Amendment's ban on the taking of private property by the government. The law requires people who own high-capacity magazines to either sell them
Selling them would not be taking.

And it would not be unlawful if states made them illegal to possess... three steps away from a persons residence. Or to restrict the number of rounds in a magazine, e.g.: nine rounds, legal, ten rounds... felony.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7723 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
You can register anyway you like.
There is no test, tea bagger.
always been a Democrat not a Leninist that call themselves Democrats.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7724 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fifth Amendment.
That is what the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES says.
PS: as I have pointed out to you five times: the "loophole" was fixed in the revision in 1968.
Haynes Vs United States is legal Precendent set forth by the Liberal SCOTUS which Stands and still stands for the whole United States and is the legal precendent set in place that is challenging the New York State Ban and it just prove that these Modern Liberals(Leninist) will pass and sign a bill into law that goes against the US Constitution and New York State just proved it.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#7725 Feb 2, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
always been a Democrat
there is not a test to claim to be a political party member.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#7726 Feb 2, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Felons are not forced to incriminate themselves anymore by registering.
Title II of the Gun Control Act (GCA) of 1968.
Even though you are a felon, honey, you can register your stolen hand gun.
Call me if you have any problems and I'll represent you for free...
So what you are saying is that any law that makes an act illegal against law abiding citizens and all the laws that are currently on the books violates the Criminals 5th amendment rights because laws are designed to self incriminate Criminals since Crimianls Occupation requires them to break the law so under the modern Liberal thinking of 1968 any criminal is free to walk because they can claim that the laws have caused the criminals to self incriminate themselves because they have to break the law so becomes self incrimination since the Liberal SCOTUS was looking out the convicted felons & not the law abiding citizen.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min USAsince1680 1,548,821
News Trump's repeated claim that he won a 'landslide... (Nov '16) 23 min Trump forever 8,671
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 57 min IND 274,777
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr huntcoyotes 241,631
News Obama's secret struggle to punish Russia for Pu... 3 hr fingers mcgurke 68
News Report: Obama ordered cyber 'implants' for Russ... 5 hr RustyS 10
News Democrats hope to send Trump, Republicans a mes... 9 hr Denizen_Kate 156
More from around the web