What the 2012 election taught us

What the 2012 election taught us

There are 10323 comments on the The Washington Post story from Nov 6, 2012, titled What the 2012 election taught us. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

We've been scouring the data for clues as to what we should learn from what happened tonight as President Obama relatively easily claimed a second term.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

“Waytogo”

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#6834 Jan 20, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean Obama's choice, Ben Bernanke, is stealing from us at the Fed? Doesn't that make you think Obama is just another criminal thief?
In 2009, the United States of America has tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continu More..ed purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her recent trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
Using two front corporations, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the State-Owned Assets Supervision as well as the Administration Commission of the State Council, the Chinese Communists have entered into a $570 million deal that gives it a third interest in an oil and gas field in Colorado and Wyoming. What’s worse is that language in the agreement has given the Chinese government the right to a third of ANY NEW oil or gas discovered in areas encompassed by this energy site.
Aside from having their tentacles in Colorado and Wyoming, other states where China has a sizable presence are as follows:
Louisiana – a $2.5 billion deal for 1/3 of a 265,000 acre energy field. China did likewise in buying a one-third share of a Michigan energy field.
The Chinese Communists have acquired a one-third share in energy producing fields in Ohio – Utica Shale field.
Oklahoma has them as well. The Chi-Coms own 1/3 of a 215,000 acre field based on a deal with Devon Energy.
In Texas, China owns 1/3 of the 600,000 acre Eagle Ford Shale energy field, and they own a small piece of the energy producing sections of the Gulf of Mexico.
What’s happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obama’s loan shark. He can’t begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.
Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.
I know Texas has bad bad bad air qualitya nd that ground water is almost poison in some parts...BUT MAN YOU SHOULD NOT DRINK POISON STRAIGHT..

Your brain is fryed and the lies are so far off....WHEW...You need help...HEY IS THIS BUSHY BOY?????????? YOU ACT AS DUMB.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#6835 Jan 20, 2013
ToManyLaws wrote:
<quoted text>
I know Texas has bad bad bad air qualitya nd that ground water is almost poison in some parts...BUT MAN YOU SHOULD NOT DRINK POISON STRAIGHT..
Your brain is fryed and the lies are so far off....WHEW...You need help...HEY IS THIS BUSHY BOY?????????? YOU ACT AS DUMB.
You forgot to answer the post. I'll help you. Here's the post again:

Do you mean Obama's choice, Ben Bernanke, is stealing from us at the Fed? Doesn't that make you think Obama is just another criminal thief?
In 2009, the United States of America tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her 2009 trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
Using two front corporations, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the State-Owned Assets Supervision as well as the Administration Commission of the State Council, the Chinese Communists have entered into a $570 million deal that gives it a third interest in an oil and gas field in Colorado and Wyoming. What’s worse is that language in the agreement has given the Chinese government the right to a third of ANY NEW oil or gas discovered in areas encompassed by this energy site.
Aside from having their tentacles in Colorado and Wyoming, other states where China has a sizable presence are as follows:
Louisiana – a $2.5 billion deal for 1/3 of a 265,000 acre energy field. China did likewise in buying a one-third share of a Michigan energy field.
The Chinese Communists have acquired a one-third share in energy producing fields in Ohio – Utica Shale field.
Oklahoma has them as well. The Chi-Coms own 1/3 of a 215,000 acre field based on a deal with Devon Energy.
In Texas, China owns 1/3 of the 600,000 acre Eagle Ford Shale energy field, and they own a small piece of the energy producing sections of the Gulf of Mexico.
What’s happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obama’s loan shark. He can’t begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.

Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.

Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."

Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.

“Waytogo”

Since: Oct 09

Location hidden

#6836 Jan 20, 2013
I wont waste time with you Texas nut jobs......OH AND BEN BERNANKE WAS APPOINTED BY YOUR STATES MORON BUSHY BOY..

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6837 Jan 20, 2013
Stoneman wrote:
Benghazi is more than a couple of days old.
Maybe you can hold onto like the Obama birth certificate- another four years.

It will come in handy in the next election...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6838 Jan 20, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Funny how the gun gnutters only know half of an amendment that is scarcely two dozen words long.

No doubt why they have problems understanding what it means...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#6839 Jan 20, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.
Tell us about those black UN hellycopters, PA!!!!!
Imhotep

Davenport, FL

#6841 Jan 20, 2013
January 19, 2013
FOX NEWS TO SHUT DOWN FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MONDAY MORNING AT 11:30

NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—Fox News Channel announced today that it would shut down for what it called “routine maintenance” Monday morning at 11:30 E.T.

Fox News president Roger Ailes explained the timing of the shutdown, which will be the first in the history of the network:“We wanted to pick a time when we were positive nothing would be happening that our viewers would want to see.”

Mr. Ailes said that Fox had considered shutting down only once before, exactly four years earlier on January 20, 2009, and later regretted the decision to continue broadcasting that day:“It turned out that no Fox viewers wanted to watch TV that day. And I mean none.”

According to Mr. Ailes, for the twelve hours Fox News is off the air on Monday the network will broadcast a continuous photomontage of white people.

“Regular viewers of Fox probably won’t notice anything unusual,” he said.

After the routine maintenance is completed, Mr. Ailes said, Fox News will return to the air Tuesday morning with its regular broadcast schedule:“For Fox viewers, it will be like Monday never happened.”

“or Fox News”

Since: Jan 08

Vicksburg, MI

#6843 Jan 20, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
January 19, 2013
FOX NEWS TO SHUT DOWN FOR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE MONDAY MORNING AT 11:30
NEW YORK (The Borowitz Report)—Fox News Channel announced today that it would shut down for what it called “routine maintenance” Monday morning at 11:30 E.T.
Fox News president Roger Ailes explained the timing of the shutdown, which will be the first in the history of the network:“We wanted to pick a time when we were positive nothing would be happening that our viewers would want to see.”
Mr. Ailes said that Fox had considered shutting down only once before, exactly four years earlier on January 20, 2009, and later regretted the decision to continue broadcasting that day:“It turned out that no Fox viewers wanted to watch TV that day. And I mean none.”
According to Mr. Ailes, for the twelve hours Fox News is off the air on Monday the network will broadcast a continuous photomontage of white people.
“Regular viewers of Fox probably won’t notice anything unusual,” he said.
After the routine maintenance is completed, Mr. Ailes said, Fox News will return to the air Tuesday morning with its regular broadcast schedule:“For Fox viewers, it will be like Monday never happened.”
You are right when you state that "Regular viewers of Fox probably won't notice anything unusual." A bunch of static when Fox is on the air, a bunch of static should it be off the air...what's the difference.

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#6845 Jan 20, 2013
Jizzlam wrote:
we're going to impeach this obama azz-clown...he is the enemy within
No, that's just your case of heartburn brought on by sour grapes.
Billy Ringo

Rego Park, NY

#6846 Jan 20, 2013
Jizzlam wrote:
we're going to impeach this obama azz-clown...he is the enemy within
Here ya go, goober ...... impeach this ......

http://www.cnn.com/election/2012/results/main

“Moderately yours....”

Since: Aug 12

Buffalo, NY

#6847 Jan 20, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Obama plans to give parts of the United States to China in exchange for payment of the debt.
What in the Constitution gives the president the authority to give parts of the United States to any other country?
Anyone?
Financing US debt is hardly This Presidents invention ask any President named Bush.
Billy Ringo

Rego Park, NY

#6848 Jan 20, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Obama plans to give parts of the United States to China in exchange for payment of the debt.
What in the Constitution gives the president the authority to give parts of the United States to any other country?
Anyone?
He's gonna give them Texas.

Hope you like rice, goober.
impeach Congress

Morrow, GA

#6849 Jan 20, 2013
Ex-GOP Con wrote:
What the 2012 election taught us....
...that America IS the greatest nation in the world. Keep moving forward America!
I am glad to see that the greater majority of Americans are awakening. The rednecks will always be the last to come on board. They are a sad lot indeed.

http://youtu.be/0iFA7mMX0MY
Stoneman

Boise, ID

#6850 Jan 20, 2013
Hypnotic Phantom wrote:
<quoted text>
You look at numbers and you do math?...You mean like all those mathematical whizzes such as Dick Morris, Karl Rove, Charles Kraughthammer, ect on the GOP side that claimed Romney/Ryan would wipe the floor with President Obama?
How did that 'look at numbers and do math' work out for you?
I wonder is that the type of math you do to make yourself feel good?
I didn't predict Romney winning. I knew the balance of voters was tilting to the liberal parasites, with the Socialist/Democrats recruiting illegals, criminals and the stupid lady with the "Obamaphone" in Cleveland. All you dickweeds need is for the percentage of people TAKING from the gubbermint dole to exceed 50% and you have it made. You can elect anybody that promises you more free stuff, and you'll sit there fat, dumb and happy in your Laz-Z-Boy recliner collecting your checks.

Then the well runs dry when the last Evil Rich Person gets tired of being punished for not sharing your lack of work ethic and leaves the country or moves his money off-shore. I've already done it-- good luck trying to find my assets, a$$hole.

That's the problem for you parasites. When all hell breaks loose and the money dries up, we'll be just fine. We were smart enough to earn it in the first place, we are smart enough to keep idiots like you from taking it.

But for now, enjoy! Lord Obama is going to STICK TO THE EVIL RICH! And he'll give you more free stuff!

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#6851 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
When there are hundreds of thousands of voters where not a single voter, not one, pressed the wrong button by mistake, then nobody really believes the count. The places where programs were written to steal all the votes are child's play to identify. It is almost impossible to find the places where programs were written to steal one in three, or one in four votes.
Because it is an obvious fact votes were stolen, nobody believes the vote count presented. If the fact that nobody believes you has no impact upon you, then it is an unavoidable certainty you will start a civil war because you are not concerned about how the population feels, and it's obvious all you seek is power because you went to the trouble of rigging the vote to acquire that power.
Now, show us the text in the Constitution that gives the president the authority to issue any order/command/instruction/rest riction/etc. to any person or entity outside the Executive Branch of government.
Got a problem with that, don't you?
There is nothing in the Constitution that gives the president the authority to issue any instruction to anyone or anything outside the Executive Branch of government.
So, Obama's executive orders aren't worth the paper they're written on. According to the Constitution, the only orders or commands or restrictions or requirements any American citizen is obligated to obey comes to the population in the form of a law passed and enacted in accordance with what is written in the Constitution.
Obama is in direct violation of the Constitution.
I think Obama actually may not be aware of this because he's never even read the Constitution in his entire life.
But, ignorance is not a justifiable excuse. If Obama uses the office of president, ignorantly or not, to rebel against the government of the United States, then he is committing treason.
The Democrats cannot avoid this civil war they seek. They are too full of themselves and their ability to indoctrinate the population with lies to not do it, and they are too ignorant to avoid doing it.
When the smoke clears, the winners will most certainly hang the losers.
If, of course, you cannot produce proof, because all you have is sour grapes, the revolution can wait. The reality is the election was won fair and square, because one party was so stupid as to think they could write off 47% of the country. Apparently, no one told them an election is a popularity contest, plain and simple.

Keep whining, my friend.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#6853 Jan 21, 2013
Buffalo Bull wrote:
<quoted text>
Financing US debt is hardly This Presidents invention ask any President named Bush.
Financing the government is never any president's invention. If you read the Constitution, you will see it is necessarily the responsibility of Congress. Specifically, the House is responsible for generating all bills related to revenue, which includes borrowing.
If either you or Obama had ever read the Constitution at least once in your lives both of you would know that.

Since you mentioned it, please tell us what happened to the deficit and debt since the Demcorats took control of all the purse strings of government in January, 2007, when they were given a declining deficit of 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollars and a total debt of 8.5 trillion dollars (having increased from 5 trillion dollars in January, 2001).
What happened to that deficit since the Democrats took control of it?
What happened to that debt since the Democrats took control of it?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#6854 Jan 21, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how the gun gnutters only know half of an amendment that is scarcely two dozen words long.
No doubt why they have problems understanding what it means...
Perhaps you can disect this sentence and tell us what it means:

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

I think you should first know what the definition of "is" is. Anyone who can't even difine the word "is" cannot possibly have an understanding of the English language sufficient to understand what the Second Amendment means.

I am convinced there will come a day soon when we will have to educate you on that.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#6855 Jan 21, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
If, of course, you cannot produce proof, because all you have is sour grapes, the revolution can wait. The reality is the election was won fair and square, because one party was so stupid as to think they could write off 47% of the country. Apparently, no one told them an election is a popularity contest, plain and simple.
Keep whining, my friend.
Let's take a look at a quote from your bible:

"An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing...."

Because you have not even looked into the matter, and the facts contradict the party line mantra you've been indoctrinated with, you are referred to Saul Alinsky for your response.

The fact is in more than 60 precincts studied, not one person pressed the wrong button by mistake.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/11/12/od...

That is an impossibility.
Thus, the computer voting machines were programmed in those cases to steal all the votes. It is impossible to find the precincts that stole one in four, or one in five votes.
I can write a program that will steal votes like I desire then erase itself after the crime. Imagine what a real IT professional can do.

Obviously votes were stolen. It is child's play to find the places where the programmer was stupid enough to steal 100 percent of the votes. The only question is, what was the scale of voter theft.

It's obvious the numbers are not reflective of the actual vote.

It's also obvious the Democrats are attempting eliminate the constitutional government and institute a fascist dictatorship.

You are fooling yourself if you think this can be done without a civil war. When the smoke clears, the winners will most certainly hang the losers.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#6856 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe you should read the Constitution.

Lot's of confusion today. Here's a simple fact. The president does not have the authority to give any order to anyone or anything outside the Executive Branch of government, other that that specified authority to issue pardons. Period. End of statement. Anyone who ever has read the Constitution in their life would know this.
Obviously, Obama has never even read the Constitution. Please tell us why the University of Chicago thought it needed a person who never passed the bar, had never seen the inside of a court room as a lawyer, and had never even read the Constitution to teach Constitutional Law in their law school.
Inquiring minds want to know.

And, you still haven't answered these two simple questions:

Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security forces in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?

(examples of an answer: In the command center watching the video and issuing the appropriate orders; or, on the golf course like he was when he didn't have a clue the operation to kill bin Laden was even happening; etc., etc., etc. A location is required to answer the question.)

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

(examples of an answer: Money will start growing on trees; or, all people regardless of income will have to pay more taxes to pay for Obama's government; or, there just isn't enough money in earnings to be taxed to pay for Obama's government and it is certain that the government will collapse under Obama; etc., etc., etc. A source of many has to be identified to answer the question.)

Tomorrow there will be an outdoor comedy routine by Obama when he pledges to uphold and preserve the Constitution. That will make anyone laugh. It would be today, but much more important events were already scheduled to occur. Well, it being Monday, not a lot of people interested in seeing it will have to take the day off from work....
Other than being recognized as 3/5 a person in the constitution, I have no problems with it.

You really could have saved this long winded soapbox rant. I've heard it before. It's been addressed.

Watching Obama today, sport?

LOL!

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

#6857 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Obama plans to give parts of the United States to China in exchange for payment of the debt.

What in the Constitution gives the president the authority to give parts of the United States to any other country?

Anyone?
My God.

You're as looney as a toon...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

2012 Presidential Election Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Election 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 14 min IND 193,608
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min Dr Guru 196,960
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 46 min shinningelectr0n 1,275,358
News Carol Shea-Porter Files to Run Again in New Ham... Aug 26 zenduane 1
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) Aug 26 IB DaMann 34,463
News Ted Cruz: If the government shuts down over my ... Aug 26 By a vote 1
News Debbie Wasserman Schultz declares 'anchor babie... Aug 25 Andrew 29
More from around the web