The one who makes the claim holds the burden of proof.I see your forum still has no evidence that meets the standards they hood others accountable to.
You can't prove a negative.
I am not making a claim, I am rejecting your claim due to lack of evidence.
Rejecting a claim is not making a claim..... We WOULD probably reject your evidence since it is probably the same fallacious points we've heard a thousand times... By you haven't presented any since I've come to this forum (only been on this one a few weeks so i apologize if i have missed any comments you've posted in the past i am not aware of)You claim there is no evidence if a prime mover so prove it.
You continuously ignore my response to your bigotry claims. You are grouping atheists to insult them all. That is bigotry. If i insult you personally, that is not bigotry. It's isn't nice... But not bigotry. I can even insult Christianity and religion entirely and not be a bigot. Insulting an idea is not bigotry. If i acted like you and said Christians are all gullible and stupid, THAT would make me a bigot.You see folks NOTHING is evidence in this arena to these loons they are simply bigots with an axe to grind. Their sole intent is singular and specific. Marginalize the God they don't believe in.
Some of the smartest people I know are Christians. Christianity is harmful and I have no respect for it with a few exceptions. Community is helpful and being alone is no fun.
Great. What are those reasons?Now my claim and challenge is there are more reasons and evidences for a prime mover than any other accountable position of belief.
It is not a battle of claims. It is about defending your own claim. Like a judge. The verdict isn't guilty or innocent... It is guilty or not guilty. Think about it.I don't debate nothin and only the most gullible fall for your irrationalities. You got something or not. Heck, you can't even make something up.
Different atheists may have different answers here.... But atheism itself is simply rejecting the prime mover. If you want to battle over one of those other options you need to go debate a scientist.Evidence is just a word to you loons. I've already exposed you so just make a case or do you feel the urge to incessantly repeat your noncase. It's utterly laughable you have nothing since 2009.
How does an antitheist decide which is the most or least likely of the following: always was, prime mover, something from nothing. Show your work please :)
Antitheists don't do questions or evidence.
Let me try to explain (I know you will hate my choice of metaphor but please understand that I am trying to put you in our shoes so yes it will sound ridiculous)
If there is a closed door and someone says " is there something behind this door? Is there nothing behind this door? Or is there an Invisible Pink Unicorn behind this door?"
The atheist answer would be... " I don't know, but its not the invisible unicorn"