Looking forward to "pear review". Hope you don't fly your "plane wrong".<quoted text>
Belief is a good starting place for science (i.e. observations hypothesis, experiment, theory, test/pear review, refine, theory). You see even when you get to the end it is still only a theory. Always subject to change based upon new information. This is what is wrong with the "decided science" crowd. Much of their proof has holes or is just plane wrong and they are not willing to accept any criticism. Everyone who disagrees with them is the pawn of big business etc...
AGW is not a science it is politics and a rather totalitarian brand of politics.
Most of all, I'm gratified to know that politics plays no part whatsoever in your denial of the agreement between all major national scientific academies and 98% of publishing climatologists that we are responsible for cooking the climate.